RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Leahy: President censored warming research



Toolbox

By Kevin O'Connor Staff Writer - Published: October 29, 2006

BURLINGTON — U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., joined the world's leading researcher on global warming Saturday to charge that the Bush administration's use of censorship to foil terrorism is hurting the fight against climate change and other environmental threats.

"If you have information that points out a problem, the only way you're going to make a correction is if you find out about it," Leahy said. "I have never seen an administration, either Republican or Democratic, as secretive as this one. It has become absolutely farcical, except that the country has been damaged by it."

Leahy, speaking in Burlington, punctuated his point by sitting beside top NASA climate scientist James Hansen, who alleged in January that the government was trying to stop him from speaking out after he called for prompt reductions in pollution emissions linked to global warming.

"There's a huge gap between what is understood by scientists and what is known by the public and policymakers," Hansen said Saturday. "I think people are unaware how close we are to the tipping point. That's not speculation. The science is clear."

Leahy and Hansen made their comments at the Society of Environmental Journalists international conference at the Sheraton Burlington Hotel, which drew 800 participants from around the world. Hansen is known as the man who testified before Congress in 1988 about a strong "cause and effect relationship" between temperature and pollution emissions into the atmosphere, sparking the first news reports about global warming.

After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Bush administration ordered federal agencies to stop releasing sensitive information. That clampdown has extended beyond national security to such scientific agencies as the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA. Journalists writing about fish migration, for example, often can't obtain basic information about bridges and dams because the data is stamped classified.

The government is censoring its research findings on global warming for a different reason, Hansen said.

"There's simply not agreement in this administration that we should do the things that need to get done. Because this has policy implications and they don't like them, they prefer we don't talk about it."

Hansen isn't the only federal employee complaining of a clampdown. Earlier Saturday, Rick Piltz told conference-goers that he resigned his senior position in the U.S. Climate Change Science Program last year after an administration official cut portions of his global warming reports before publication.

"They have never given any reason why they have suppressed the report, they just suppressed it," said Piltz, now director of the national watchdog group Climate Science Watch. "The net effect has been to misrepresent the information about climate change and therefore undermine national preparedness."

Piltz commended Hansen for speaking out publicly.

"Not all scientists have the cachet to be able to do that," he said.

Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he is working to strengthen the country's Freedom of Information Act, but is facing resistance from Republican majorities in both houses of Congress.

"The secrecy is hurting everybody — it makes the days of Watergate look like child's play," Leahy said. "But it is possible that, if there really is a tsunami about 10 days from now in the congressional races, it will change."

Leahy and Hansen prefaced their remarks by saying government secrecy isn't new.

"I've had problems with prior administrations," Hansen said. "But there's apparently a feeling (the Bush administration) has the right to influence what gets out to the public rather than let it be based on scientific results."

The Society of Environmental Journalists conference, being held for the first time in Vermont, has included such speakers as Middlebury College scholar Bill McKibben, whose 1989 book "The End of Nature" was the first to explain global warming to a general audience, and New Yorker staff writer Elizabeth Kolbert, author of the latest book on the topic, "Field Notes from a Catastrophe: A Frontline Report on Climate Change."

Participants also heard from Ben Cohen, co-founder of Ben & Jerry's ice cream, and previewed an environmentally themed work in progress by John O'Brien, the Tunbridge filmmaker behind "Man with a Plan."

Contact Kevin O'Connor at kevin.oconnor@rutlandherald.com.





PQ: "There's a huge gap between what is understood by scientists and what is known by the public and policymakers," Hansen said Saturday. "I think people are unaware how close we are to the tipping point. That's not speculation. The science is clear."








READER COMMENTS


This is the most important issue facing the human race at this time. Do you ever wonder why more Americans don't take it seriously? If you check up, you will find that ExxonMobil has spent over 100 million dollars funding groups and web sites denying global warming and paying a handful of 'scientists' to be skeptical so as to create an impression with the American public that there is no scientific consensus on the subject. As James Hansen remarked in your article: "The science is clear". There is a worldwide scientific consensus that global warming due to mankind's carbon emissions is a reality and that we are tragically close to a 'tipping point' where the warming we've created will trigger other events that will further increase the rate of warming and the whole process will then be out of our control no matter what we do. We will then be faced with runaway climate change that will transform this planet into something that we will not even recognize, almost certainly resulting in the death of most of the human race. Those who have tried to cover up the evidence regarding global warming are guilty of crimes against humanity worse than anything the Nazis ever did. They are selling out our descendants for the sake of their silly short term profits.
-- Posted by Malcolm Emunson on Sun, Oct 29, 2006, 8:06 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout