• Bush to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq
    By TERENCE HUNT The Associated Press | January 11,2007
    • Email Article
    •  Print Article
    WASHINGTON — President Bush on Wednesday acknowledged for the first time he erred by failing to order a military buildup in Iraq last year and said he was increasing U.S. troops by 21,500 to quell the country's near-anarchy.

    "Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me," Bush said.

    The military increase puts Bush on a collision course with the new Democratic Congress and pushes the American presence in Iraq toward its highest level. It also runs counter to widespread anti-war passions among Americans and the advice of some top generals.

    In a prime-time address to the nation, Bush pushed back against the Democrats' calls to end the unpopular war. He said that "to step back now would force a collapse of the Iraqi government, tear that country apart and result in mass killings on an unimaginable scale."

    "If we increase our support at this crucial moment and help the Iraqis break the current cycle of violence, we can hasten the day our troops begin coming home," he said.

    In addition to extra U.S. forces, the plan envisions Iraq committing 10,000 to 12,000 more troops to secure Baghdad's neighborhoods.

    Even before Bush's address, the new Democratic leaders of Congress renewed their opposition to a buildup.

    "This is the third time we are going down this path. Two times this has not worked," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said after meeting with the president. "Why are they doing this now? That question remains."

    Sen. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., said, "I agree with President Bush that we need a new strategy in Iraq but, in my view, that strategy must involve fewer American troops in the region, not more. Our soldiers and their families should not continue to pay the price for the president's failed policies. Our troops should come home as soon as possible and it is time for Congress to use its constitutional and budgetary authority to make that happen. While we should continue to financially support the Iraqi government and their military, we simply cannot allow President Bush to make a bad situation even worse by sending more American soldiers into the quagmire of Iraq."

    Senate and House Democrats are arranging votes urging the president not to send more troops. While lacking the force of law, the measures would compel Republicans to go on record as either bucking the president or supporting an escalation.

    Usually loath to admit error, Bush said it also was a mistake to have allowed American forces to be restricted by the Iraqi government, which tried to prevent U.S. military operations against fighters controlled by the radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, a powerful political ally of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

    The president said al-Maliki had assured him that "political or sectarian interference will not be tolerated."

    After nearly four years of bloody combat, the speech was perhaps Bush's last credible chance to try to present a winning strategy in Iraq and persuade Americans to change their minds about the unpopular war, which has cost the lives of more than 3,000 members of the U.S. military as well as more than $400 billion.

    Bush's approach amounts to a huge gamble on al-Maliki's willingness — and ability — to deliver on promises he has consistently failed to keep: to disband Shiite militias, pursue national reconciliation and make good on commitments for Iraqi forces to handle security operations in Baghdad.

    "Our past efforts to secure Baghdad failed for two principal reasons: There were not enough Iraqi and American troops to secure neighborhoods that had been cleared of terrorists and insurgents," the president said. "And there were too many restrictions on the troops we did have."

    He said American commanders have reviewed the Iraqi plan "to ensure that it addressed these mistakes."

    Bush said that under his plan, U.S. forces will work alongside Iraqi units and be embedded in their formations.

    Responding to concerns from U.S. commanders, Bush said American troops will have a clearly defined mission to help Iraqis clear and secure neighborhoods, assist in the protection of the local population and "to help ensure that the Iraqi forces left behind are capable of providing the security that Baghdad needs."

    While Bush is putting the onus on the Iraqis to meet their responsibilities and commit more troops, he did not threaten specific consequences if they do not. Iraq has missed previous self-imposed timetables for taking over security responsibilities.

    Bush, however, cited the government's latest optimistic estimate.

    "To establish its authority, the Iraqi government plans to take responsibility for security in all of Iraq's provinces by November," the president said.

    Resisting calls for troop reductions, Bush said that "failure in Iraq would be a disaster for the United States. A democratic Iraq will not be perfect. But it will be a country that fights terrorists instead of harboring them."

    But Bush warned that the strategy would, in a short term he did not define, bring more violence rather than less.

    "Even if our new strategy works exactly as planned, deadly acts of violence will continue, and we must expect more Iraqi and American casualties," he said. "The question is whether our new strategy will bring us closer to success. I believe that it will."

    Bush's warning was echoed by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a leading proponent of a troop increase.

    "Is it going to be a strain on the military? Absolutely. Casualties are going to go up," the senator said.

    Bush said he considered calls from Democrats and some Republicans to pull back American forces. He concluded it would rip Iraq apart.

    "Such a scenario would result in our troops being forced to stay even longer and confront an enemy that is even more lethal," the president said. "If we increase our support at this crucial moment and help the Iraqis break the current cycle of violence, we can hasten the day our troops begin coming home."

    Still, Bush said that "America's commitment is not open-ended. If the Iraqi government does not follow through on its promises, it will lose the support of the American people and it will lose the support of the Iraqi people. Now is the time to at."
    • Email Article
    •  Print Article
    MORE IN News
    Narration and audio production by RH Alcott Full Story
    ADNews: US Army denies DAPL permit
    A Swiss law firm claims Vermonters for a Clean Environment violated the rights of the owners of... Full Story
    A Swiss law firm claims Vermonters for a Clean Environment violated the rights of the owners of... Full Story
    More Articles