RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

On Main Street



Toolbox

Published: September 20, 2008

Main Street and Wall Street were the two places everyone was talking about this week. The question was whether the implosion on Wall Street would draw in Main Street with the gravitational force of its collapse.

We are Main Street — the car loans we take out, the meals we put on our credit cards, the houses we buy or don't buy, the gasoline we pump into our cars. If suddenly, our credit limits have been shrunk or car loans are no longer affordable, or we can't afford to take a Sunday drive, then two things have happened. Our economic power and the options we enjoy in our lives have been limited, and all those merchants and dealerships and banks who would have sold us goods and services are losing sales. This is how recessions happen.

The pace of events when history is actually happening can be astonishing. During the past week we have witnessed the collapse of major financial institutions and comparisons to the banking collapse that led to the Great Depression. In response the federal government has committed itself to hundreds of billions of dollars of loans and other forms of what are called bailouts.

To put it another way, a select few government officials are committing Main Street — you and me — to the solvency of Wall Street. The assumption is that we are all in this together and that the public interest in this crisis requires public investment in private companies. As a result, the federal government now owns an 80 percent share of AIG, the world's biggest insurance company. Some critics have called it socialism. That might be so, if the takeover of AIG were inspired by ideology and were part of a plan. But the takeover is really an effort to save capitalism from itself, as Franklin Roosevelt sought to do during the Great Depression.

The two officials who have been at the helm during these momentous events have been Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. Brief appearances by President Bush have served mainly to underscore his irrelevance. Bernanke and Paulson are taking the crisis seriously, and members of Congress appear ready to follow their lead in the effort to create an institution that will take on the bad debt that now threatens the world's financial system.

Barack Obama has exercised restraint in his comments on what should be done, urging greater regulation of the financial markets in the future but leaving it to the policymakers in power now to make the decisions that have to be made in these perilous days.

John McCain has lashed out at greed on Wall Street and issued a call for Bush to fire Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. At the time Cox was formulating a plan to forbid short selling on Wall Street in order to stabilize the stock market. McCain's call for his firing was an example of the kind of rash, politically motivated action that is not needed in this crisis.

Main Street watches with wariness. Vermonters are busy stockpiling firewood for the winter. Wall Street is a long ways away, but it never felt as close as it has in the past few days.








READER COMMENTS


Whoo is Randull Smathers ?
-- Posted by Christian Essene on Mon, Sep 22, 2008, 5:43 pm EST

report this comment



And what proof does Just Your Average Citizen offer that substantiates his/her claim that the editorial in question was written by R. Smathers? Is it not within the realm of possibility, that the piece was written by another member of the Rutland Herald's editorial board.

Rants lose credibility when some of the assumptions upon which they are based are incorrect.
-- Posted by Wurdy Smithy on Mon, Sep 22, 2008, 2:46 pm EST

report this comment



I am not a socialist by the way.
I'm a highly nuanced small c capitalist, with the emphasis on HIGHly.
-- Posted by Just Your Average Citizen on Mon, Sep 22, 2008, 11:44 am EST

report this comment



Who is this Tiberius Gracchus you speak of ? Sounds like a patriot to me.
-- Posted by Just Your Average Citizen on Mon, Sep 22, 2008, 11:42 am EST

report this comment



Looks like Tiberius Gracchus changed his name to "Just Your Average Citizen", why the change in name? Did the Rutland Herald ban your last account? Keep up the good rant and raving!
-- Posted by (Anonymous) on Mon, Sep 22, 2008, 7:42 am EST

report this comment



Jenny P, You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Socialism is NOT totalitarianism. If it is, you need to tell the Swedes and the Norweigans and The Danish, albeit there governments are less socialistic than they were say, umm 30-35 years ago. Better tell The Canadians too, because on the political compass, even their most conservative elected officials are socialistic. The Harper Government is the most conservative government in the history of modern day Canada, but they are slightly to the LEFT of US liberals by any standard of comparison. Martin Luther King was heavily influenced by SOCIALISTS in The Civil Rights Movement and was planning to hold a Poor People's March on Washington D.C. when gunned down. And while he did condemn Totalitarian Communism, he had no problem whatsoever with "Third Way" Socialism.
IT was his critique of American style corporate capitalism that ultimately cost him his life in fact. After 1966, when he started to speak out most stridently against US quasi-imperialism in Southeast Asia, is when the mainstream press turned against him in fact, on marching orders from J. Edgar Hoover in all probability. Also, England ? I think you mean The United Kingdom, and sharia law does NOT hold sway in the UK for the general populace, nor will it ever be the law of the land there. The phenomenon of sharia law being an influence in the UK is no more or no less powerful than rabbinical courts in some areas of NYC, something I am sure you no nothing about. And yet, do I hear you calling for the dismantling of rabbinical courts in NYC or in the UK for that matter ??? And I never mentioned Senator Obama. You did. By your logic, Martin Luther King would not be supporting Senator Obama's Presidential bid. I beg to differ. So do his surviving children, who are of course, all Obama supporters, just as he would be if he were still among the living. And I, unlike you, did not vote for Bill Clinton twice. I did not even vote for him once. And anyone who employs, "noose" imagery in such a conversation, is obviously a Rush Limbaugh dittohead. The fact that you can't distinguish between Communism, Socialism, Capitalism, and Fascism says it all. Perhaps you should alert your local Green Peace Chapter and let them know that there are folks in Iceland being "brutalized" by their Socialist Government. Of course, an island like Iceland would be communally oriented regardless of the ideological label. Or take for instance Ireland.
Of course their has always been a Socialist tendency in response to conditions,
but the Socialist Party of Ireland has never had much power itself. Both major Irish parties though, do of course have what any political scientist would deem, socialist planks in their platforms. The most popular President that the USA has ever had, if we are to consider his 4 landslide victories as evidence, would be Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Was he surrounded by a cult of personality like a fascist leader ? That's a subject for debate. No more or less so than Ronald Reagan or the current bozo in chief. Did he experiment with ideas you would consider Socialist ? Ever heard of SOCIAL Security ? He also had a great influence on LBJ. Ever heard of The Great SOCIETY ??? Other examples are too numerous to list with regard to The New Deal and similar Democratic Party Platforms which followed. So you are a life long Democrat eh ? I really doubt it.
You have too many right wing talking points to fool anybody. I will give you credit for Mussolini being a Socialist of sorts before assuming power in Italy. So was his father. They were Socialist Republicans. (Italy as a nation was a fairly recent entity if you recall.) So were many in Italy. World War I changed that. Mussolini emerged from World War I with a vision at odds with the populist socialism he had previously embraced. He even wrote words to that effect.
Socialism does NOT invest all the power in the hands of one man. Fascism does, or sometimes invests it in the hands of a few like-minded tyrants. And whereas I apparently, because of your historical ignorance, "made you laugh" after you read my previous comments, I will make you THINK because of my undeniable scholarship. There is nothing funny about this subject. You are a very confused person Jenny P. I could lecture more about this subject, or we could examine every "Socialist movement" in history, but it's really not worth my time. If you were just a tad brighter, it might be, but you're not. Now it is your turn to justify every vote you ever cast for a Democrat. From the sounds of it, you have cast votes for Democrats that I have never heard of. Fill me in. That way I can point to their records and extract their socialistic beliefs for you and make you look like a bigger moron than I already have. Sounds like you are a disgruntled Hillary Clinton supporter to me. (If I am wrong, show me how and tell us WHO you did support in the primaries then, because apparently, your desire to punish The Dems is something new for you.) But back to Hillary Clinton. Following her dalliance with suburban Rebublican support of Barry Goldwater in her youth,
she was heavily influenced by a few Socialist thinkers. Do I need to list them for you ? She wrote her Senior dissertation/thesis about one in fact. Of course, when you are carrying as much water in the bucket for right-wingers as you are so obviously doing, picking up a book and reading about such topics, is probably too much of a burden for your arms. Any other questions or should I continue deconstructing your ideological quintessence for you dearie ? Any opinion on the recent fascistic moves by Paulson, Bush, & Co. honey ? Or are you too blind to have seen it ? Cast your vote for McCain this fall Jenny. It does not matter in Vermont. Obama's victory is a foregone conclusion in Vermont. I'm not voting for Senator Obama. I'm voting for Cynthia McKinney of The Green Party.
Why ? I prefer her brand of Socialism to Senator Obama's brand of Socialism or Senator McCain's brand of psuedo-patriotic Corporatism aka Fascism. Again, any other questions ??? I hate to sound like an elitist, but next time, challenge someone who is on an intellectual level commensurate with your own Jenny. Choose your battles more wisely or you will lose them every single time, just like you lost this one. Better to sound like an elitist than an idiot I suppose.
-- Posted by Just Your Average Citizen on Mon, Sep 22, 2008, 12:45 am EST

report this comment



"Just Your Average Citizen", sorry, but I had to laugh.. while the far right is fascistic, the originators of fascism, were the far left. Mussolini was a socialist, so your claim that you'd embrace socialism shows exactly where you stand. There is no difference between Northern and Southern European socialism, anyone who is paying attention to what is happening in Europe now, is well aware that it's become fascistic. The elites there are steamrolling over their people's voting rights, in England they've imposed sharia law, and one of their leaders is now saying that it's the duty of all citizens who become debilatated to accept euthanasia.

Socialism has failed utterly, all it's claims. It's a brutal, totalitarian system that is tantamount to slavery. Dr. Martin Luther King said as much, "without the right to self determiation, a man is a slave. He spoke out against communism and socialism after studying both political dogmas.

As to Obama, he is in the pocket of Wall Street, it's the reason this liberal democrat is NOT voting for him. His cohorts, Rep. Rahm Emmanuel is demanding that we push through expansion of NAFTA, Rep. Zoe Lofgren wants to push through 550,000 more visas for foreign workers to displace more American citizens in the workforce. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Sen Harry Reid, Obama, Kerry, and the rest are demanding that we allow the UN to impose a tax on us to bleed more money out of our country to send to Africa, Latin America and Asia. I would prefer to punish the democratic party, for betraying their base, the working poor and middle classes.

Bush is a terrible president, I never voted for him, but he couldn't have gotten away with half of what he has, if not for Bill Clinton laying the groundwork for him.

Anyone who votes for Obama is putting a noose around their neck and placing their children and grandchildren on the slave auction block, he is not an ethical candidate, he wants to sell us all out to those who line his pockets.
-- Posted by Jenny P on Sun, Sep 21, 2008, 4:44 pm EST

report this comment



Colin Bridge,

I never mentioned Hitler or The Republican Party.
I was thinking more along the lines of Buzz Windrip. Hey Colin, at one time, I worked in an office one floor below Hank Paulson's office in Manhattan.
Ya know, when he was at Goldman Sachs. You have heard of Goldman Sachs, right ? He was the CEO there. Ah c'mon, you know Goldman Sachs, right Colin ??? Goldman Sachs would be the corporation that was not allowed to fail, even though just a few weeks ago, Paulson said, "No more bailouts". Ain't it a koinkydink that all of Goldman's rivals were allowed to fail, except for Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs will get bailed out, as will Morgan Stanley. What a koinkydink !!!
Geez, I wonder what Paulson's stock portfolio looks like. Think Paulson has any Goldman Sachs stock ??? Well regardless, his old buddies made out like criminals. Hey, that's it !!! THEY ARE CRIMINALS !!! You aren't able to recognize a fascist Colin because you ARE A FASCIST Colin. Do you think Hitler invented fascism ? You are a buffoon.
-- Posted by Just Your Average Citizen on Sun, Sep 21, 2008, 11:17 am EST

report this comment



........."Brief appearances by President Bush have served mainly to underscore his irrelevance"

"Barack Obama has exercised restraint in his comments on what should be done, urging greater regulation of the financial markets in the future but leaving it to the policymakers in power now to make the decisions that have to be made in these perilous days."

.......Huh!!! Bush leaves it to the experts and is seen, by you, as irrelevent where as Obama leaves it to the experts and is seen, by you, as exercising restraint. Almost like "The View" with Bah Bah Wah Wah. And Just Your Average Citizen(i am the wizard of oz) takes your head off with his insane rantings about republicans being the new hitler.
Colin Bridge
-- Posted by Colin Bridge on Sun, Sep 21, 2008, 11:08 am EST

report this comment



Bush said that he wanted to prevent this from spreading from Wall Street to Main Street. Who does he think he's kidding? With an energy crisis, educational problems, rising unemployment, 20 million illegal aliens, substantial increases in H-1B visas, and illegal wars on our hands, does he think that we don't already know that special interest manipulation of the government has already put these things through our front doors?

There is no way to make this a good thing, but there is a way to make it a little less bad. http://ewebsmith.com/bus/taxpayers.html
-- Posted by Web Smith on Sat, Sep 20, 2008, 5:06 pm EST

report this comment



In 1933, at the start of FDR's first 100 days, he declared "a bank holiday"
in order to reorganize the nation's financial system.
In 2008, as we near the end of Dubyadipsydumbdumb's 2nd term, will he, under the pretense of some economic crisis or "terrorist threat" declare an "election holiday" and attempt to prolong the length of his rule or that of his Party ? If he does, who will stop him and "them" ? You ? Me ? Your friends? Or will they tremble in fear instead ? Are you willing to defend The Constitution ?
What do you do when THE ENEMY is waving YOUR FLAG ???
-- Posted by Just Your Average Citizen on Sat, Sep 20, 2008, 1:43 pm EST

report this comment



stopping short selling will NOT stabilize the market...it is an essential tool of the market-making process.
-- Posted by Yalie on Sat, Sep 20, 2008, 9:24 am EST

report this comment



Mr. Smathers is so historically uninformed that he does not recognize fascism when it is staring him right in the face. You say the government will own 80 % of AIG (it's actually 79.9 % that they will own because if they owned 80% their liability would be different. If you did your homework you would know that.) BUT, it's BIG BUSINESS which now owns 100 % of GOVERNMENT fool !!! Thats called Corporatism. That's called Fascism. Paulson, Bush, and Co. are not saving Capitalism from itself you FOOL !!! They are saving FASCISM for the FASCISTS !!!
Socialism ? That would be most welcome, and not the socialism for the wealthy variety, but rather the Northern European model please and thank you. Comparing Bush and Co. to FDR and his New Deal efforts is LAUGHABLE !!!
The DESCENDENTS of the same Fascists who tried to remove FDR from office with The Business Plot in 1933-1934 and who successfully removed JFK from office 1963 are NOW IN CHARGE !!! Do your homework Mr. Smathers !!! Do a little homework about The Bush Family and THEN TRY TO PROVE ME WRONG !!!
Your editorials are GARBAGE and so is your mind !!! And pssst, John McCain if he were President, would have been Constitutionally BARRED from firing the SEC chairman Chris Cox. Why didn't you mention that in your editorial ? That is what made John McCain look like such a fool. Maybe a fool like you is unable to recognize a fool like John McCain. DO YOUR HOMEWORK BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR NEXT EDITORIAL OR LET SOMEBODY WHO IS FAR MORE CAPABLE WRITE THEM !!! The Republic teeters on the brink of a REVOLUTION in the streets while YOU compose odes to Hank Paulson. Pull your head out of your woodpile.
Has the political center moved so far to THE RIGHT since Ronald Reagan
that The Editor of The Rutland Herald can't distinguish between a Fascist and a Communist ? The fictional Doremus Jessup is turning over in his fictional grave.
It Can't Happen Here ? Ummm, it's happening here. Open your eyes fool !!!
-- Posted by Just Your Average Citizen on Sat, Sep 20, 2008, 4:45 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout