RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Sprinklers limit Sheldon damage



A Rutland City firefighter removes burned bedding from the Sheldon Towers fire. Below, Rutland City Fire Chief Robert Schlachter lets residents back into the Sheldon Towers after the fire on Saturday night.

VYTO STARINSKAS / RUTLAND HERALD

Toolbox

By Josh O'Gorman Herald Staff - Published: November 24, 2008

A woman escaped serious injury in a fire at Sheldon Towers in Rutland that started when a cigarette she was smoking in bed came in contact with an oxygen tube she uses to breathe, according to fire officials.

Rutland Fire Department responded Saturday night to a bedroom fire at Sheldon Towers. Firefighters received the call at 9:39 p.m. and within two minutes responded to the 10-story tower, said Chief Robert Schlachter.

When firefighters arrived, they could see smoke pouring out of a seventh-story window, and because the elevators were not functioning, firefighters climbed the stairs to apartment 708, the source of the smoke.

Schlachter said firefighters forced the door open and found that while the room was filled with smoke, the building's sprinkler system had extinguished most of the fire. Schlachter said because the fire was mostly extinguished, he did not issue a mutual aid call to departments from other towns.

Schlachter said the tenant from 708 was not in the apartment when firefighters arrived, but they later located her in the hallway. Schlachter said she had suffered light burns and some singed hair, but she declined medical treatment Saturday night and again declined treatment Sunday.

Schlachter said the victim uses oxygen to breathe, and while lying in bed she removed her oxygen tube and left it resting on her chest because she wanted to smoke a cigarette. Schlachter said the lit cigarette came in contact with the oxygen tube, igniting it, the woman's dress and her bed.

The woman was able to remove her burning dress without inhaling the flames and exited the apartment, Schlachter said.

Firefighters threw the woman's bedding, including her mattress and box spring, out the seventh-story window as they extinguished the remaining blaze, then performed a room-by-room search of the building looking for anyone suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning, Schlachter said.

While firefighters searched the apartments, a few of the tenants watched from outside while others waited in the ground-floor lobby. By 1 a.m., with the fire extinguished and everyone accounted for, the tenants were allowed to return to their apartments.

"She's the luckiest person around," Schlachter said of the victim. While it is unlikely the oxygen tank itself would explode — oxygen itself is not combustible, but does enhance combustion — the injuries and the damage to the building could have been much worse, he said. "Oxygen and smoking are not good things to have happening at the same time."

The fire has rendered two of the apartments temporarily uninhabitable, said George Sykes, emergency services director for the Central Vermont/New Hampshire Valley Chapter of the American Red Cross.

Sykes said Red Cross caseworkers have found temporary shelter for two individuals from two different apartments. Sykes said it was his understanding that thanks to the building's sprinkler system, the damage was minimal and the tenants would be able to return to their apartments soon.

Schlachter agreed that the sprinkler system definitely minimized what could have been a far more dangerous and damaging event.

"This is a success story for the sprinkler system, the alarm system and the design of the building," he said. "This could have been much worse."

Contact Josh O'Gorman at josh.ogorman@rutlandherald.com.









READER COMMENTS


I too have been in this place, my aunt lived there, and not one single person commented on the fact that the ELEVATORS WERE NOT WORKING
THE FIREMEN HAD TO CLIMB 7 FLIGHTS OF STAIRS, DRAGGING THE EQUIPMENT?? Thank God for diligent firefighters, my maiden name is Carole Minard, and I can't believe the towers were let to run down, what will we do with the seniors next, put them in Storage Lockers. GOD BLESS SENIORS
-- Posted by MO on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, 5:57 pm EST

report this comment



Once again I find people commenting on things without being well and completely informed. Of course if the RUTLAND HERALD would do it's job properly and do the work neccesary to get the story right then we could know how to respond.
I just happen to live at Sheldon Towers and have been a tenant there for more than ten years.
Now to the facts-----There were many more than two people displaced by that fire. In fact seventeen apartments were affected, the elevators were flooded and put out of commission and I would quess that the damages in total will exceed 100,000 dollars. It WAS caused by a person that was smoking in bed while connected to liquid oxygen. It is possible that her smoking is the reason she is on oxygen. Her lit cigarette came in contact with the oxygen line, thus the fire. The fire was hot enough to set off two sprinklers and with at least a twenty gallon per minute flow rate a certain amount of flooding is bound to occur. Is we all know, water has a tendancy to flow downhill and with hundreds of gallons of water flowing throughout the 7th floor, those apartments adjacent were also flooded and the ones below were also.
And, just so you will know, the person that caused the fire has already been evicted. This was the second time they had caused a fire due to smoking. After the first time they were warned that if it happened again they would be evicted and they signed an aggrement not to smoke inside their apartment again and acknowledging that to do so would lead to immediate eviction. The management of the Rutland Housing Authority did the best that could be expected under such trying circumstances.
-- Posted by Malcolm Jensen on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, 9:06 am EST

report this comment



What did people do 30 years ago? When everyone smoked did the hospital burn down then, no they just paid more for Ins... No I don't smoke
-- Posted by joy joy on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, 4:28 am EST

report this comment



1. In Bed
2. Smoking
3. With oxygen on

Here's Your Sign
-- Posted by Concerned FireFighter on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, 8:29 pm EST

report this comment



The woman has not right tp smoke a cigarette or any other obect in the in prese nce of flammable gases. Her irresponsible action had adverse affects on two other tenants.

The offender should be removed from the pemises folliwng a due process investigaton. If I wew he insurer for the building or family memnbers of other folks residing there, I woul be demanding action that will prevent a recurrence. Indeed, dies the insurer accrue any fidciucary responsilbity fo a will ful and possible illegal act that results in destruction of property.

WE have not right to pursue dangerous acticvity in our harms when risk to other resdients and neighbors might ensue

Imagine this scenario at erupting at RRMC or local long ternm care facilities.!!!
-- Posted by Concerned About Rutland on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, 8:23 pm EST

report this comment



This lady pays rent so she has a right to smoke in her home if she wants to I don't know what the management can do. They installed sprinklers and fire alarms. Things like this happen. kids playing with matches or a tipped over candle. It isn't as if she did this on purpose because she was mad and wanted revenge. Taking their RIGHT to smoke away isn't going to solve the matter if that is what you are hinting at. We live in America and have a right to do things in our home.
I am glad that no one got seriously injured. No I am not a smoker either.
-- Posted by Michelle Burnett on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, 6:52 pm EST

report this comment



Geez Michael, if this is an example of "survival of the fittest" the outlook is bleak. YIKES.
-- Posted by Jody Frederick on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, 12:37 pm EST

report this comment



Grab your dictionary and look up "social Darwinism."
-- Posted by Michael in Vermont on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, 11:49 am EST

report this comment



YOU MIGHT BE A REDNECK IF......
-- Posted by Funny Man on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, 10:12 am EST

report this comment



It will be interesting to follow what steps the management of Sheldon Towers will take--or not-- to prevent a recurrence of this sort of event.
-- Posted by Concerned About Rutland on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, 9:21 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout