RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Vermont Yankee's vulnerabilities



Toolbox

Published: January 6, 2009

To address a recent letter's comments on the history of Vermont Yankee, the reactor was shut down a total of 19 times in the first 17 months of operation. That is not an auspicious beginning.

As to the comments on ability to evacuate after problems, how dangerous is spent nuclear fuel?

Recently, the NRC recommended reactors use military protection in case of attack.

Furthermore, reseachers at Sandia National Laboratory concluded, after crashing airplane wings, a potentially destructive fuel-air deflagration could also occur in spaces below some (spent nuclear fuel) pools. Many pools do not have containment protection like reactors. (Vermont Yankee's spent fuel pool is five stories above the reactor.)

The Swiss Nuclear Regulatory Authority has also stated: "From the construction engineering aspect ... one cannot rule out the possibility that fuel elements in the fuel pool or the cooling system would be damaged and this would result in a release of radioactive substances."

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff have stated it is prudent to assume that a turbine shaft of a large aircraft engine could penetrate and drain a spent-fuel-storage-pool.

ROBERT LINCOLN

Rutland








READER COMMENTS


In 1972 the 513 megawatt Vt. Yankee reactor began generating power. It promptly shutdown 17 times during a 19 month period! 1 shutdown occurred because of the fear the control rods in the reactor might have been installed upside down. Major "offlines" were due to accidents, equipment failures, defective parts and the discovery of dangerousoperating conditions. A spokesman for Vt. Yankee at the time, asked to comment onthe plant's reliability, was quoted by the N.Y.Times as saying" We're not as bad as some but we're not as good as others" High praise indeed!
Nuclear fuel was one of the problems. Radioactive moisture inside fuel pellets ate through the zircalloy fuel rods and escaped.The plant had to install a new filter system, at a cost of $10 million, to trap the dangerous escaping vapor. Another time the plant was closed for months because the fuel pellets kept sliding in the cladding forming 'hot spots' that could cause the radioactive fuel core to overheat, then melt. Then the power to a vital safety device was cut off by workmen installing a tv unit. This caused the reactor to speed up- a very dangerous occuranceundering oprating circumstances.
These are just a few examples of Vt. Yankee's failure to " provide Vermonters with a clean and reliable environment and socio-economic advantages!"
-- Posted by R. WilliamL on Fri, Jan 9, 2009, 9:48 am EST

report this comment



I am sorry to say this letter is one most deceiving and incorrect mix and match urelated facts I have ever seen. It has one intent, to cause feer.
-- Posted by Richard Meister on Wed, Jan 7, 2009, 1:46 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout