RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Springfield hears town chiefs on budget



Toolbox

By Susan Smallheer Herald Staff - Published: January 8, 2009

SPRINGFIELD — Springfield Select Board members kept their own counsel Tuesday evening during the first review of the proposed $9.1 million town budget, which is up 9 percent over last year's budget.

The board held the first of at least four public meetings on the budget, hearing from all of the town's department heads with the exception of police, fire and ambulance. Most of the budgets were level-funded except in the area of personnel.

The biggest increases came in the area of personnel, which often reported line item increases of 20 percent to 30 percent.

The big increase was due to a policy adopted last year by the Select Board, which added two more step increases to the town's pay policy for merit. Many town employees were at the top of their pay grade and only received cost of living increases.

Select Board member Kristi Morris, who was elected to the board last year, asked the most questions during the three-hour session.

Select Board Chairman Mark Blanchard said he was aware of the fact that the town of Hartford was seeking concessions from its unionized employees as a means of avoiding layoffs. In Hartford's case, the town administration has said that the high cost of health insurance is forcing them to cut other costs.

In Springfield's case, health insurance coverage is only going up $45,000 this year, according to the budget presented by Town Manager Robert Forguites.

Forguites presented what the different department heads had proposed to him, and said he would let the department heads make their own pitch to the board directly.

One of the biggest increases is the proposed rebuilding of Summer Street, and Public Works Director Harry Henderson outlined the $795,000 project.

Henderson said about half of the total cost of the project will involve installing new granite curbs and new sidewalks along both sides of Summer Street, stretching for 6,000 feet. Eliminating one side of the street would save the town about $100,000, Henderson said.

But Select Board members said if sidewalks were eliminated on one side of the road, the town would have to install crosswalks, among other problems.

Henderson said he was hoping the road project would attract contractors eager for work and willing to cut their profits.

"We're hoping to see some hungry, hungry contractors and see some prices we haven't seen for a while," Henderson told the board.

Henderson said while it was an expensive project, it was a good opportunity to take advantage of the poor economic conditions and have the work done at a good price.

Henderson said he and Forguites had discussed phasing the project to lessen the impact on the tax rate, but he said they agreed there was no good way to spread the project over several years.

The highway department's policy of awarding workers' compensatory time instead of overtime should be reviewed, said John Follett, a resident who attended the budget session. Follett is a former longtime Select Board member.

Henderson said in the summer, the highway crew is cut in half because people are off using their comp time.

"That puts Harry in a terrible situation," Follett said, suggesting the board review the policy.

Henderson said workers max out at 240 hours of comp time, with most people accumulating 150 hours (almost four weeks) of comp time during the high-overtime winter months.

Linda Rousse, the town's personnel director, said workers got paid at their current rate when they finally take their comp time, and not the rate they were getting at the time the overtime occurred. She said that was federal law.

Blanchard cut off discussion of the overtime/comp time issue, saying it was outside the goals of the budget sessions.

Budget sessions are set to resume tonight, with the board hearing from Springfield Police Chief Douglas Johnston and Fire Chief Russell Thompson.

Contact Susan Smallheer at susan.smallheer@rutlandherald.com.








READER COMMENTS


Springfield has fallen off the radar scope of its local, state, and federal elected officials. It usually takes either some kind of ribbon cutting for a state handout like the vocational center or the prison, or a trivial media event like the premier of The Simpsons movie to draw any attention these days. Town fathers have let this happen. They've accepted the scraps that the state will send them and have not sought to form meaningful coalitions between local, state, and federal officials to seek concrete improvements for the town. The languishing will continue until well-paying jobs can be created through the recruitment of industry willing to locate in the area. Barring that, the future remains bleak for a once great town. The voters must shake off their complaceny and demand quality representation (unlike Emmons and Martin) at all levels, from the Board of Selectmen to the U.S. Congress. Until the voters step up and flex their ultimate power at the ballot box and demand that elected officials assist them in their efforts to restore a viable economic base, the town will continue to languish...
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Sat, Jan 10, 2009, 7:17 pm EST

report this comment



Yes. Springfield languishes.

I'm encouraged to see that others have noticed.

When I moved here, I was told that "Springfield was on the move!" Nothing could be further from the truth. There is no spark here, no life, no hope. Only doom.
-- Posted by mark on Fri, Jan 9, 2009, 8:45 am EST

report this comment



It astounds me how someone like Alice Emmons can be re-elected to the Vermont legislature, for she has done extremely little for Springfield -- and it continues to show (save for her nice new retaining wall, that is)! Springfield has been poorly served, if not outright abandoned by government at all levels; left to languish in the shadows of its proud machine tool, industrial heritage.
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Thu, Jan 8, 2009, 3:20 pm EST

report this comment



Nine to ten percent budget increases for either the town budget or the school budget is unacceptable in this economy and both the town and school officials of Springfield should be embarrassed over presenting such a proposal! Adding increased steps to pay scales for the sole purpose of increasing pay over and above cost of living increases (which are also dubious under the current economic realities) is akin to our Congress giving themselves a $4,700 raise this year. Does anybody in Government (federal, state, or local) get it anymore? The taxpayer is tapped out, fed up, and disgusted by bureaucrats whose only answer seems to be to ensure they feather their own nests first and then pass a nice bill along to the taxpayer. But of course, these budgets are coming from the "Pollyanna" politicians that have given Springfield "gifts" like a new vocational center (read a $600,000 bill a year), a new recreation center (unlikely to be self-supporting), a new police station (taking a revenue generating property off the tax rolls and foisting another operating bill on the taxpayer), a prison (gaining Springfield new recognition as a "prison town"), a growing mental health services footprint, and a hugely expensive schools renovation plan. Just incredible. It's time to VOTE NO on any budget increases, demand that Government live within its means, and VOTE OUT every incumbent politician at every level!
-- Posted by P Carey on Thu, Jan 8, 2009, 12:10 pm EST

report this comment



In regards to the Summer St project it is nice to see that State Rep Alice Emmons had trees removed and a nice new retaining wall put in front of her house. Must be nice to be a state rep.
-- Posted by Jonathan Graham on Thu, Jan 8, 2009, 10:31 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout