RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

School Board looks to cut $1M



Toolbox

By Josh O'Gorman Herald Staff - Published: January 10, 2009

SPRINGFIELD — The School Board is soliciting public opinion as they look to cut nearly $1 million from next year's budget.

Thursday night, during the first of three meetings devoted entirely to the proposed fiscal year 2009-10 budget for the Springfield School District, School Board member Larry Kraft advocated "level funding" the operating portion of the budget.

The year's proposed budget of $25,866,667 is $2,383,663, or 10.2 percent, more than the current budget of $23,483,004. Much of the increase stems from payment on the $32.8 million bond approved by voters in November 2006 to improve the town's elementary schools. Excluding the debt payment of $1,462,491, the budget is increasing $921,172, or 3.9 percent, from $23,483,004 to $24,404,176.

With a debt payment that cannot be cut from the budget, Kraft and the board are looking to eliminate the increase in the operating budget, possibly at the expense of current and future staff.

"I know many people, including management at Springfield Hospital, aren't taking raises this year," said Kraft, who is also the director of the Springfield Hospital Foundation.

Board member Marilyn Thompson agreed with Kraft.

"I'm looking for a sacrifice from employees this year," Thompson said.

Salary and benefit increases for District employees make up $513,705 of the proposed $921,705 budget increase, but the teachers in the audience during Thursday's meeting balked at the notion of a pay freeze.

"If I take a pay freeze I will lose my house. I'll have to take another teaching job," said Alison Sylvester, a second-grade teacher at Park Street School.

Board member Sam Coleman said he would prefer to cut new proposed positions before making any cuts to existing staff. New positions under the proposed budget total $323,226.

Another budget item discussed is $77,163 for a Title I teacher. Title I is a federal program to help children in poverty, but an expected reduction in federal aid would require the District to pick up the cost to provide the same level of service.

Lisa Hall, who sits on the budget advisory committee, asked if there was any way to "resolve the needs" of those students so the position would not be needed in the future.

Kraft said the federal grant money allowed the district to have teachers they would not have paid for otherwise.

"Would we have created these positions if they hadn't been free? Probably not," he said.

By freezing salary and benefits, eliminating new positions and cutting the Title I transfer, the budget would be reduced by $914,094, close to the target of $921,172.

Time is running out for the Board to approve a budget. They must sign a warrant no later than Jan. 22 for town meeting March 3.

"It would be nice to know what you're thinking so we can make thoughtful cuts rather than frantic cuts," said Elm Hill School Principal Jonni Nichols.

The Board is looking for input from the public to learn what they would like to see cut from the budget. Friday, they posted a link on the District's Web site, www.ssdvt.org, inviting public comment.

"Because next year's budget must include the first bond payment of $1,462,491.00 on our school construction bond, the board is considering significant reductions in the operations budget," the page reads. "Please tell us what you consider to be vital educational services, other suggestions and creative ideas you have for the proposed budget."

The comments will be given to the Board members before their next budget meeting.

In a symbolic gesture of belt-tightening, the Board voted Thursday to cut the $2,500 budgeted for Board member salaries.

The board will continue budget discussions Monday and Thursday. Both meetings begin at 6:30 p.m. and will be held in room B118 in the River Valley Technical Center.

Contact Josh O'Gorman at josh.ogorman@rutlandherald.com.








READER COMMENTS


We were asked to post suggestions for the shool board, this is mine.

One suggestion would be absolutely no new postions added (world language teachers for elemtary school?). We need to concentrate on the problems that already exist rather than creating new problems. I have children in elementary and high school and I believe we can make do with the staff we have.
Another suggestion would be looking into using school transportation software. In other school districts the use of this software has eliminated entire bus routes as well as the need for additional class rooms and teachers by more evenly distibuting students, and thus saving thousands of dollars. This site may help with providing a little more information http://www.versatrans.com/products/testimonials.cfm.

Without knowing what the budget is that is being presented the public can not be expected to really come up with too many logical replies. Is it possible for the proposed budget to be put on to the school web site?
There are many people who refuse to buy homes in Springfield because the tax rate is so high, by adding to the increasing rate you are stopping people from buying here. There are currently over 100 single family residences in Springfield for sale (many of which stand empty). Empty homes do not bring income into the community. Even though the sale prices ae lower in Springfield the tax rate is so high, moderate/lower income families can not touch them.

The "rebuilding" of Union and Elm schools has made for a lot of bad feelings. I don't know about Elm, but Union already has problems and is not even close to completion. Library leaks, heating system that does not work properly, no library shelves, no playground equipment. I am sure the people would be very excited to know of all the issues that are arising from the 32 million dollar schools that are not even finished, as the school department asks to increase the budget by 10%!!!!!!
-- Posted by Linda Benoit on Sun, Jan 11, 2009, 10:27 am EST

report this comment



""If I take a pay freeze I will lose my house. I'll have to take another teaching job," said Alison Sylvester, a second-grade teacher at Park Street School."

Well, it's like this....would you rather have a pay freeze, benefits and a job or have your position eliminated entirely to meet the budget?

Sacrifices must be made all around. By every one.
-- Posted by Steve Graves on Sun, Jan 11, 2009, 9:58 am EST

report this comment



To members of the school board: Here's a concept -- step up and exert some leadership, do your job, and make recommendations to the voters who elected you. Quit sitting back and "asking the public" for recommendations. Unlike the public, you, as board members, have total access to the entire budget and can review it line by line. Identify and differentiate essential/high priority educational services from non-essential/low-priority ones and then beginning paring back those elements that are non-essential/low-priority first. If you can't achieve the desired results from the non-essential/low-priority services, then work your way into the essential/high-priority until you attain the budget target. Your superintendant and staff should be assisting you with this. I know that I'm not the only one who has become sick and tired of town leaders abrogating their responsibilities and unwilling to confront the difficult challenges of their work head on. Every year they tip-toe around the hard budgetary questions and toss the matter over the fence for the voters to vote on, which usually results in budgets being rejected. Then they make some minor symbolic cuts and return it again for successive votes until, having fatigued the voters with the issue too many times, it manages to pass by a thin margin. Guess what tactic they're going to try and use this year, too? Voters, be ready! Do not let them shackle you with even higher taxes.
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Sat, Jan 10, 2009, 7:03 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout