RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

School Board slashes trips, sports



Toolbox

By Josh O'Gorman Herald Staff - Published: January 14, 2009

SPRINGFIELD — Field trips, athletics and after-school programs are all on the chopping block after nearly $1 million was cut from the proposed budget for the Springfield School Board.

Monday night, district administration presented a budget to the School Board with $921,172 in cuts from the one originally offered in December. The proposed operating budget — $23,483,004 — is identical to the current budget approved by voters in June.

The new proposed budget is increasing $1,462,491, or 6.2 percent, from $23,483,004 to $24,945,495. The increase is due to debt payments for the $32.8 million bond approved by voters November 2006 to improve the town's elementary schools.

The new budget will raise the residential tax rate 8.5 cents, or 7 percent, from $1.1963 to $1.2813. A property owner with a home valued at $150,000 will see his or her taxes increase from $1,794 to $1,922. Taxes on a home valued at $250,000 will rise from $2,991 to $3,203.

The cuts will apparently affect students more than teachers, who, with the revised budget, will still receive $513,705 in salary and benefit increases.

"We want to thank the principals for making a minimal impact on student learning," said Stephen Karaffa, president of the Springfield Teacher's Association.

While the teachers might be happy, students next year will likely miss going on field trips. The field trip budgets for elementary, middle and high schools have been cut entirely, a savings of $18,950.

The revised budget also cuts more than $24,000 for athletic equipment and salaries for coaches and officials. The $40,000 originally budgeted for after-school programs has been cut in half.

Also cut from the budget is $270,670 in new staff positions, including an elementary school world language teacher, a new custodian for Union Street School and two technology-related positions.

"It's unclear what the effects of these cuts will be," said Becky Read, principal of Riverside Middle School, which cut $75,000 supplies books and equipment.

Read said nearly half of her students receive free or reduced lunch, an indication of poverty, and in the past the school provided these students with pencils, binders and composition books. Next fall, she said, parents living in poverty will have to buy these school supplies for their children.

The budget received the unanimous approval of the budget advisory committee, and while the board will meet again Thursday, it is unclear what more will be done before Monday, when the board is expected to sign the warrant for town meeting March 3.

The meetings begin at 6:30 p.m. and will be held in Room B118 of the River Valley Technical Center.

Contact Josh O'Gorman at josh.ogorman@rutlandherald.com.








READER COMMENTS


Many who have the means to leave do leave, but there are still others who remember and have lived through better days in Springfield and are trying to stem the rising tide of taxes. "Springfield on the Move" was largely ineffective because it never achieved a comprehensive, fully integrated plan to recruit industry back to Springfield. It focused instead on bandaids like Fellows as an incubator for new businesses and symbolic sprucing up to make the town appear more attractive, at least temporarily. Its caretaker government has been characterized by a record of relative complacency, always giving in to budget increases that translated to higher taxes for its citizens. And state and federal government have done it no favors. Anyone remember when the last time was that there was a Leahy or Sanders sighting in Springfield? The town has been forgotten...
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Thu, Jan 15, 2009, 9:04 pm EST

report this comment



Harry Bird said:

"As far as Springfield itself, the slogan "Springfield on the Move" is correct. Those who can move, are."

So very true! I think I know more people who've left Springfield than who are still here.

In fact, people are always leaving Springfield: If they can't relocate permanently, they at least flee for a day to the economic sustainability of NH just across the river. So, in a sense, virtually EVERYBODY leaves Springfield. Some are successful enough to not have to come back.
-- Posted by mark on Thu, Jan 15, 2009, 5:48 pm EST

report this comment



It's nice that the teachers are happy, and they will not even lose there house and have to look for other jobs. I wish I could say that I'm happy, I've loss over 20,000 dollars in the last few months but my taxes will still go up and I could lose my house. Let alone my kids may need those pencils! Heck a pen may be out of the question all together! I watch the comedy on SAPA called a school board meeting, what imput do you want that will be listen too? At times you seem to be mocking those that offer any imput. This board that is made up of former teachers or those that have ties to teachers. We live in a town with a declining population (depending on prison cells at times we could be up) and the biggest employers are the school system and town services, both non tax paying but are supported by the taxpayers. Don't let me forget the State of Vermont offices. It's time to get a grip, folks are lossing jobs, funds and homes. If you're over staffed time to cut, and by the way you are overstaffed. As far as Springfield itself, the slogan "Springfield on the Move" is correct. Those who can move, are.
-- Posted by Harry Bird on Thu, Jan 15, 2009, 4:49 pm EST

report this comment



At least some progress seems to occurring, but there's still more to cut before any warrant is signed by the board!
A 6.2% budget increase that results in a 7% residential property tax rate increase is still too much. How can the budget advisory committee, in good conscience, approve something that exceeds the cost of living increases (for which most in Springfield don't receive an equitable adjustment to their pay every year)? And how can the board, in good conscience, sign a warrant for such an increase. Talk about "putting a warrant out" on someone! If they approve this they'll be putting a warrant out for the arrest of taxpayers wallets!
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Wed, Jan 14, 2009, 10:57 pm EST

report this comment



Again, there just doesn't seem to be a recognition on the part of the school district that they need to hold the line against any increases. The school district and board should continue to be challenged to pare this thing back to level funded, even with the debt payments included. After years of successive budget increases, it would be a wonderful display of appreciation on their part to the tax payers of Springfield who have financially sacrificed and given the school system so much.
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Wed, Jan 14, 2009, 10:55 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout