RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Louras, Trapeni air their differences



Candidates for the Rutland City Board of Aldermen participate in a debate at PEG TV in Rutland on Wednesday evening.

Cassandra Hotaling / Rutland Herald

Toolbox

By Brent Curtis STAFF WRITER - Published: February 26, 2009

Residents asked and the two candidates for Rutland mayor answered Wednesday.

In their latest face-to-face public appearance, Mayor Christopher Louras and challenger David Trapeni responded to questions ranging from taxation and business growth to bully pulpits and employee morale.

The two candidates, who competed with four others in a six-way race for mayor two years ago, answered questions posed by Rutland Herald Editor Randal Smathers during a televised forum sponsored by the Farm to City Group, PEG TV and the Herald. The questions were mainly submitted by voters.

The majority of the more than dozen questions posed to the candidates dealt with the economy and how businesses, taxpayers and city services could weather the storm.

The candidates gave similar answers to several questions — both support more efficient city government and energy audits of city buildings.

However, they disagreed on many more topics and traded questions directly with each other on a few topics.

For example when asked about "Smart Growth," the practice of concentrating commercial development in centers — such as the city's downtown — rather than sprawled out over long linear areas — such as Route 7 in Rutland Town — Trapeni followed up Louras' statement of support for focused development by saying:

"We obviously have no smart growth now with all the empty storefronts and upper floors," Trapeni said. "I look at the situation this way: Most of the people working at Hannafords and Staples live in the city … To say sprawl on Route 7 is bad, I just don't buy it. I don't care if they do that type of business from here to the airport."

But Louras, who has voiced his opposition to approving city services for commercial developments that compete with city establishments, said the restaurants and retailers south of the city were bad for downtown business.

The candidates also had different visions of future economic anchors for the city and region, which has seen several longtime employers leave town in recent years.

Louras talked about making Rutland a food processing hub where locally grown goods could be branded and readied for export in a business arrangement he said he's been hammering out with the Rutland Area Food and Farm Link.

"We could have agri-business here," he said. "We could grow the next Ben & Jerry's."

Trapeni also talked about agriculture in Rutland and the importance of the downtown farmers' market. However, the plumbing supply store owner said commercial and even industrial developments didn't represent Rutland's economic salvation.

Tapping into tourist dollars, especially the winter skiers at Killington, was the strategy Trapeni said he would pursue.

"We're the Green Mountain State and we need green industry. We need to develop the tourist trade," he said.

Turning to crime and operations at the police department, Louras talked about work he's done to get the city money to devote an officer to community drug interdiction work involving door-to-door chats with residents about drug activity in their area.

Louras also said he's talking now with Sen. Patrick Leahy about "significant" amounts of federal money for Rutland's law enforcement.

But Trapeni said the door-to-door efforts haven't been focused enough — he said the police should focus their efforts on the "five streets" where he said the bulk of the city's drug trafficking was taking place.

He also said the city needed police to patrol on foot.

The most contentious exchange between the candidates took place during a discussion about what role the mayor should have overseeing the city's police commission — an independent, mostly advisory body whose membership is appointed by the mayor.

The commission's activities have been put under a microscope since the release of two morale surveys that found widespread dissatisfaction among the police department's rank and file with the three officers that lead the department.

Trapeni criticized the commission for recommending a raise for the police chief while the department was working, seemingly unsuccessfully, to restore faith in the leadership.

"There were two reports unfavorable to the chief but he was rewarded with a new contract," Trapeni said. "I think the commission is out of touch and I would either dissolve it or make them answerable to the mayor or the aldermen. … I would not allow them to continue working in the shadows."

Louras said he was restrained from answering Trapeni's remarks in full due to ongoing negotiations for a new contract with the police union.

However, the mayor said the commission had served the city well since its creation 20 years ago and he challenged the accuracy of some of Trapeni's remarks, especially his assertions that city Police Chief Anthony Bossi was the most highly paid law enforcement officer in Vermont.

"I checked the Vermont League of Cities and Town. They list Chief Bossi as the fourth highest paid law enforcement officer in the state," he said.

brent.curtis@rutlandherald.com.








READER COMMENTS


Trapeni!!! That's all we need is another professional business man running for office just to BENEIFIT HIS OWN BUSINESS!!!

ONLY IN AMERICA!!!
.
-- Posted by None None on Tue, Mar 3, 2009, 8:08 am EST

report this comment



I think that if either one of these candidates really want to make positive changes for Rutland, then they need to come up with better ideas. I feel like everyone in the area has been let down by our mayor. I'm not stating we have obstacles that can easily be overcome, but we need fresh ideas and new voices. I read below that someone mentioned how it was the same friends & family involved in the board, and I think that is true. They both need a better strategy if they are going to win over the public.
-- Posted by Jessica Smith on Sat, Feb 28, 2009, 7:59 pm EST

report this comment



I 2nd that. It makes no sense to enjoy driving on a road for one month before the plows destroy them. Why bother laying down new pavement if we cannot even enjoy it?
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Feb 28, 2009, 1:01 pm EST

report this comment



I say we start off by taking 10-15% off the boards and mayors pay. That should pay for a group of people to go around and make sure there is no waste of money going somewhere else in local government, or local monopolies. Maybe with less pay we may see people get the positions that actually want to make a positive difference. And these clowns we have are no longer interested and go back to their way of lives.

Next all Govt. buildings should be checked to make sure they have adequate staffing. To really make sure no place is overstaffed and wasting taxpayers dollars on people that have nothing to do.

We have all seen one employee that works hard and if they were to leave. It sometimes takes 2-3 Employee's to replace 1. Obviously something needs to be done and if they cannot keep up the pace. Get rid of them.

Any business like C.V.P.S. which obviously has a monopoly in the area should be checked for staffing as well. If they are over staffed and are charging Vermonters too much for electricity. It's time we bring that to a close. We shouldn't be paying people to not do their work just so they can hire extra people to do their work for them. It is our Local Government that needs to protect the local population when it comes to monopolies.

The same should be done with Comcast/Verizon. I hear friends online talking about paying 24.95 for the same service we pay 59.95 for. Our local government should be protecting us from overpriced monopolies in the area. I don't feel they have been doing their job. They need to start doing their job.

I think it was mentioned below. Too many repeat family members/friends end up on the board. It's time to get some new faces on the board. Just seems they are too relaxed and think they have their future handed to them on a silver plate. They kick out businesses they don't want. (Like some bars in the area that were actually worth going to.) And allow other bars to stay in the area which get MORE POLICE traffic than their predecessors. It all comes down to politics and who they want around and who they don't. I think changing the Board members would be the largest step to recovery.

Major road construction always seems to be done right around fall time. If you do it earlier in the year the concrete/pavement will have more time to heal. It will last longer. Stop doing this so late in the year. You are just wasting tax dollars. I bring this up because some of the roads around here are in serious need of repair. Again, if you are going to wait til August/September to allow these roads to get done. Cancel them til the following year. You are just throwing our tax dollars in the ground.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Feb 28, 2009, 12:53 pm EST

report this comment



A matter of integrity. A willingness to stand behind what one says. That's all. The same for you. It's like a person not voting yet complaining of the outcome.
-- Posted by randal wright on Sat, Feb 28, 2009, 11:56 am EST

report this comment



Mr. Wright:

I can't imagine why Thyme annoys you to such a great degree!
-- Posted by Wurdy Smithy on Fri, Feb 27, 2009, 5:33 pm EST

report this comment



Hey Randall, who left you in charge. Louras is part of the problem of shortsightedness. There is no one in charge in City Hall right now. Just mosre of the same "good old boy" cover ups, favors, whatever it takes to get re-elected. A professional politico. Trapeni doesn't plan on making this a life-long career and in that will clean house, overall the budget and institute quality, proven policies to move Rutland forward and out of the clutches of DOC and the State Mental Hospital as our only source of growth.
-- Posted by Justn Thyme on Fri, Feb 27, 2009, 4:33 pm EST

report this comment



Thyme:
Shut up. Just shut up. If you cannot stand behind your own name, just shut up! All you others too. Nice job Mayor Louras. Thanks for your efforts and your thick skin!
-- Posted by randal wright on Fri, Feb 27, 2009, 2:36 pm EST

report this comment



Back Nine,

Shopping Carts cannot vote. So we leave that decision to you Humans.

We just hope that the Humans of Cartland City will take the time to carefully consider what all the Mayoral and Board of Alderman candidates say and do, and their track records. And, we hope that the Humans will show up at the polls on Tuesday, March 3rd.

Please, remember to vote. May the best Humans win!

Sincerely,
Blanche Cart
-- Posted by Blanche Cart on Fri, Feb 27, 2009, 1:29 pm EST

report this comment



Obviously Louras supporters have little faith in their Mayor why else reduce his campaign for re-election to mudslinging. To set the record straight, Mr. Trapeni received a ticket for burning scrap wood on his own acreage without a permit, not the misinformation being put out by the Louras campaign. Louras is prone to pushing vocal citizens off the podium during BOA meetings because they propose policy change affecting effective City Hall and Board management. Check the Peg-TV video. Louras displays a propencity to lie, cover up and misled issues whenever he can; a sort of Blosonofabicth sociopathic tendency where the truth is buried so deep, it may never be found.
-- Posted by Justn Thyme on Fri, Feb 27, 2009, 12:24 pm EST

report this comment



For all who wish to see where the issue of the police chief raise is coming from, please check out this video with all the info straight from City Hall:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDyTwu5trm8

Dave Trapeni is right, how can we expect to ask the union for concessions, when we are providing raises to the administration?
-- Posted by Shawn Pemrick on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 8:34 pm EST

report this comment



lI think Dave Trapeni made some important points on the lack of Mayoral management of city services. He spoke openly on the shortsightedness of a publicly funded realestate development that was neither a complete project or provided for the need most people to have somewhere's to park. Details that Dave would oversee. Chris' has taxed us right into foreclosures without doing the hard work to rid the City of unnecessary or unessential employees with union contracts we cnnot sustain. Dave on the otherhad has pratical, logical plans to focus economic development with our recreational resources and institute energy conservation to all public buildings. Dave has said he will bring in the responsiblity for economic development under his watchful eye in City Hall. Right now, the five outsourced agencies have had no results and costing us plenty. Nothing wrong with saving the taxpayers money. Chris seems to lack empathy or the willingness to on details of the mess in City Hall. Dave first priority will be to overhall the budget entirely. I have to say I like Dave's strategy and his honesty. The devil is in the details. Details are what prospering communities recognize as the most important to success.
-- Posted by Justn Thyme on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 3:41 pm EST

report this comment



Shopping carts have a powerful voice with this lobbying group. Blanche Cart, the community is waiting for your endorsement list for Alderman & the Mayors race.
-- Posted by Back Nine on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 12:42 pm EST

report this comment



Dear Mayoral Candidates and citizens of Cartland:

Regarding the question about the "Shopping Carts", we were taken aback by the use of the term, "Abandoned Property".

More correctly, we are kidnapped and abandoned Transportation Workers in the grocery and retail industry. We just want to set the record straight:

http://www.cartlandvt.com/comics/cartlandvt_comics_mayordebate.shtml


Remember to please vote on Tuesday, March 3rd. May the best Human win!

Sincerely,
Blanche Cart
-- Posted by Blanche Cart on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 11:44 am EST

report this comment



The only way a "super" Walmart would positively affect downtown would be for it to MOVE OUT of downtown. The people who shop at Walmart do not support downtown businesses, the downtown retailers could tell you that, what few have survived.
-- Posted by concerned citizen on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 11:28 am EST

report this comment



Fact Check: Mr. David Dress said he has a college degree during his intro at the CSJ Alderman forum on 02/23/09. Check re-runs at PEG-TV to see if I'm incorrect but I'm pretty sure that Mr. David Dress DOES NOT have a college degree in accounting. He's a bookkeeper.
-- Posted by Barbara Buffum on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 11:10 am EST

report this comment



Chris seems to have done a good job other than the shortsighted vision for a dead downtown that only works for the status quo and investment squatters. As an example beyond the need to give town development full support (Everyone benefits), giving Wal-Mart free reign to expand to a full Super Wal-Mart wouldl bring much new traffic to downtown, and to new little businesses. ...Nobel/Ace Hardware could make a fortune teaching small minded Mom & Pop businesses how to compete successfully with the Big Dog.
-- Posted by Marginalized Voices on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 10:54 am EST

report this comment



The Police Commission is a junta in the banana republic called Rutland City headed by a single minded politico type and manned by absentee Police/Fire/ Recreational/Public Works Chiefs or Dept. Heads embedded to keep the public ignorant, heavily taxed and to perform advantageous favors for family members and associates. The general budget cap has been breached with a 25% overload in employee salaries and benefits being sold as a vague $2.5 stimulus bond. Do you realize we have $28 Million in outstanding bond debt. Keep voting them in folks. The call to declare Rutland City bankrupt by Joe Tilton may be a reality in the not too distant future when the last resident boards up their former repossessed home auctioned off for .10 cents on the dollar to the Landtrust or one of our favorite son landlords for DOC inmate housing. Cockroaches like politicians can survive a nuclear holocaust. Clean house people, vote in some fresh faces on the board and in City Hall and stop the gravy train connection to a selected few well connected sons of Rutland, while the rest of us wonder how we will heat our homes next winter, if it hasn't been repossessed for taxes.
-- Posted by Justn Thyme on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 8:31 am EST

report this comment



Thanks? ... Um... I think?
-- Posted by Christopher Louras on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 7:19 am EST

report this comment



Louras is dumb.
Trapeni is dumber. Much dumber.
CHRIS LOURAS FOR MAYOR !!!
-- Posted by Christian Essene on Thu, Feb 26, 2009, 4:50 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout