RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Officials may nix limit on raw milk purchases



Toolbox

By Peter Hirschfeld VERMONT PRESS BUREAU - Published: March 20, 2009

MONTPELIER – Lawmakers this session will consider abolishing a limit on raw milk sales that some industry experts blame for stifling a niche dairy market. Administration officials, however, say the public health hazards posed by unpasteurized milk outweigh whatever financial benefits farmers stand to gain.

A compromise measure last year doubled allowable daily sales of raw milk from 25 quarts to 50 quarts. Amy Shollenberger, head of Rural Vermont, says many farmers are already bumping against the new ceiling.

"There's a market out there, and this bill gives farmers an opportunity to develop that market and to make a business plan that's right for their farm and for their community," Shollenberger says.

The commodity price of milk has plunged in recent months to near $10 per hundredweight – less than $1 a gallon. As farmers hemorrhage money in the depressed milk market, Shollenberger says, raw milk sales can provide a much-needed revenue stream for farms on the brink. Raw milk sells for an average of between $5 and $7 per gallon in Vermont and is sold in some areas for as much as $12 per gallon.

"Right now we know of some conventional dairies that are making it because they're selling raw milk, and really the only cash flow on some farms right now is from raw milk sales," Shollenberger says.

David Lane, deputy secretary of the Agency of Agriculture, says undermining food-safety measures now in place could ultimately harm both consumers and farmers.

"For pediatricians, health groups, veterinarians, and farmers that aren't selling raw milk, from their standpoint they would prefer no raw milk being sold," Lane says. "Fifty quarts is a compromise that, from an epidemiological standpoint, is a level of acceptable risk."

Lane noted that last summer, a young girl fell ill from eating ice cream made from raw milk. In cases across the country, epidemiologists have traced outbreaks of bacterial diseases to consumption of raw milk.

"The dairy industry itself is concerned about the impact of an outbreak, which could taint all milk in the state," Lane said.

Shollenberger said the bill includes strict testing requirements that would mitigate any risks. The legislation also requires direct farm-to-customer sales, which, according to Shollenberger, will ensure that consumers are knowledgeable about the product they're buying. Besides, she says, the issue is about consumer choice.

"Regardless of whether there's a true risk or not, people want this product and right now some people who want it can't get it and some farmers are prevented from taking advantage of a clear demand for this product," Shollenberger says. "… I should be able to decide what food I want to eat."

Lane, though, says heightened concerns over food safety generally make now the wrong time to consider eliminating the 50-quart limit.

"We're at a time when there seems to be more pubic concern and outcry for food safety than ever before," Lane says. "To move in another direction right now doesn't seem to make sense."








READER COMMENTS


Fortunately, times have changed!

Healthy milk comes from healthy cows milked in sanitary conditions.
Pasteurization has a role to play in food safety. It can reduce the ill effects of the poor diets fed to cows in large commercial operations, and for lousy sanitary conditions.

When pasteurization was first introduced, germ theory itself was concept still in its infancy. Cows were milked by hand, and designated hand washing stations weren't exactly on the scene. As a result, the quality of the milk hinged directly on the health and cleanliness of the farm hand who did the milking.

Nutrition was another realm of learning that was far less developed at that point in history. As cities boomed, factories sprang up, and it seemed logical to station dairy cows next door to liquor distilleries in order to funnel the cooked grain waste products into the troughs of the cows. This diet devoid of living green foods weakened the cows and left them vulnerable to disease.

Sick cows were milked with bare hands into non-sterile containers.

When pasteurized milk was first sold to the city populations who were falling ill, they saw fewer babies dying of infectious diseases. It seemed like a miracle! But then they watched these babies waste away from malnutrition, as the heating process killed off crucial nutrients and made the remaining components more difficult to digest properly. (Their mothers' fresh milk would have been the best food for those babies, of course, and I see that as the most troubling factor here!)

When I say I know my farmer personally, I mean that I have observed his process from the cleaning of the milking machine to the point where he pours the milk into the jars I provide. I watch the cows amble back out into the lush greenery outside.
I see that no human hand (clean or otherwise) touches this milk before I pour it for my children.
I would never buy milk from a farm where all of this were not true.

As a consumer, I appreciate that I have this choice to make.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Mar 21, 2009, 11:53 pm EST

report this comment



Just before pasteurization was discovered everyone drank milk from nearby farms. They had to, there wasn't any refrigeration and no way to transport it any great distance. People were also getting sick, having miscarriages and dying from drinking raw, locally produced milk sold to them by farmers they knew personally. Start selling large amounts of raw milk again and see the same thing happen again.
-- Posted by Angel None on Sat, Mar 21, 2009, 6:29 pm EST

report this comment



...The dairy industry itself is worried about the impact of an outbreak, which could "taint all the milk in the state" ???...

If Vermont's families bought milk from the farms where it is produced, that would clearly help prevent any problem spot from affecting anyone else!

For years we bought raw milk from a pediatrician who had four children himself: a doctor who understood that fresh milk from healthy free roaming animals is profoundly superior to processed milk from malnourished animals confined to a factory-like existence. His kids grew up and moved away, so they don't need enough milk to justify their own cow anymore.

When cows eat foods their bodies are not equipped to digest, like soy products and grains, they are profoundly more susceptible to illness.
When they roam outside eating what they choose: clover, alfalfa, and other fresh green plants, they enjoy long, healthy lives.

I prefer raw milk- I know where it's been!
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Mar 21, 2009, 1:25 pm EST

report this comment



Safe food comes from smaller sources, not larger ones. We see exponentially more illness from pasteurized milk and other processed foods that come from huge systems than we do from local community dairy farms.

When I buy milk from my local farm, I chat with the farmer, and can observe the sensible, sanitary practices that put fresh wholesome milk in my four gallon jars each week. I see the two cows grazing on fresh green grass in the sunshine and know that they are healthy animals making healthy food for my children.

I am delighted to pay $6 per gallon for this milk.
Why deny Vermont's farmers the ability to sell all their milk to local customers?
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Mar 20, 2009, 2:54 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout