RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Wind farm opposition gathers steam



Toolbox

By Gordon Dritschilo Staff Writer - Published: May 2, 2009

IRA — Opposition to a proposed wind farm began to organize at the town hall Wednesday.

A handful of residents for Ira and surrounding towns met to discuss their concerns about Vermont Community Wind Farm's efforts to put as many as 60 wind turbines in and around the town of 460. They discussed hiring lawyers, direct-mail campaigns and rewriting town plans.

Activist Annette Smith advised the group, although she stressed she was there as a private citizen and not as executive director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment.

Per White-Hansen, owner of Vermont Community Wind Farm, described his plans at a locally organized forum last month. Following that meeting, Stanley Shapiro of Ira said he and several others were shocked.

"This was like somebody walked up to you and said, 'Guess what, you've got a big tumor and we're going to operate tomorrow,'" he said.

The group of about a dozen came together because they felt there was not enough community engagement in the process.

People at the meeting listed two main concerns — environmental destruction likely to be caused by building the towers and attendant roads along with noise and other environmental effects they expect to suffer once the towers are up.

Shapiro and others at the meeting said that they were not opposed to wind power, but the scale of the project is simply too large.

"The level that's proposed here is so great, it would take this environment and simply destroy it," he said.

People at the meeting also said a perceived lack of transparency bothered them, pointing out that White-Hansen has been slow to contact the towns and he has not answered questions about who is financing the project.

Shapiro said a lawyer told him they would need at least $400,000 to fight the development on the legal front, and Smith added that anti-wind activists in Sheffield have spent $750,000 fighting the development there.

Smith told the group the Public Service Board has particular ways of gauging local attitudes toward a proposal.

"The only thing that matters is what's in the town plan and what's in the regional plan," she said. "I looked at the Ira town plan energy section and it might as well have been written by Per."

One option, she said, is to rewrite the town plans. Organizers agreed they had time if White-Hansen plans to spend a year gathering data before applying. Smith also said the PSB will pay attention to a local referendum, though she said Ira was not ready for such a vote.

Marshal Squier of Tinmouth, who organized the April forum, said it was also important the group get a good idea of how Ira as a whole feels.

Jeffrey Wennberg, VCWF's local representative, said Thursday that all the environmental concerns will have to be spoken to as part of the permitting process.

Wennberg also understood how people in the area might feel frustrated at a lack of answers from VCWF, but it was early in the process and the company doesn't have some of the answers it will in the future. He also said a public outreach effort is under way.

gordon.dritschilo@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


For all of you proponents of wind energy who knock the naysayers. You obviously have internet access.... so do a little research on the possible negatives before you get excited about low energy costs and bashing the locals who are concerned about wind energy in their "backyards". Take the time to go to: http://www.windturbinesyndrome.com/ and poke around. When you get to the videos, make sure that you turn up the volume on your speakers and imagine never hearing the natural wind again as it blows through your backyard! Whether you are a Vermont native or a "flatlander", one of the reasons you stay here is the natural beauty and serene nature of our countryside. It is certainly not the low taxes and plentiful jobs. Do you want to go hiking or fishing to sit and listen to 'wooosh, wooosh, wooosh? I would hope not. Oh by the way, if you are a hunter, don't bother to look for deer or turkey or any other living creature within a 3 to 4 mile radius of a wind farm.... they are smart enough to move out of the area!
-- Posted by Robert Hodge on Mon, May 4, 2009, 11:56 pm EST

report this comment



I don't understand!

Years ago when the ski and tourist industry took off, nothing much was said about the buisness that raped the land for Killington, Okemo, and many other mountains
to build their trails and lifts. One trail in perticular, the lift that comes down on Rt. 100 north of Woodard Res., was cleared without proper permitts and when confronted, they said they were cutting firewood. Look at the way they destroyed the envirnment! Take a look at the photos of the early 1900s of these lands and tell me that the outcropping of condos and chalets all over the mountains is more pleasing to the eye than the wild forests they replaced!

As for noise, live close to one of these ski areas and tell me how good of a nights sleep you get with the snow guns running 24-7!

The only thing that this change did for Vt. was to raise the prices of everything so high that the locals had to go out of town, or as in the case of Ludlow, out of state to even do grocery shopping. Real estate went thru the roof.

Now comes the wind farms.

Envirnmentaly "Green"
Lower energy / electric bills
Income to land owners
Low cost to opperate

At least there is a posative side to come from the wind farms. I can't believe that there would be any more inpact on the land than ther would be from having it logged off.
-- Posted by Personal Opinion on Mon, May 4, 2009, 9:16 pm EST

report this comment



The 'not in my backyard' people are probably trust-funders with big investments in energy and utility companies. They've probably never had to pay a utility bill for their business. When Yankee is put down for good, electric rates in VT are going to sky-rocket (2x -3x) unless we have 2 dozen wind farms the size Ira or unless we build a new nuke plant. There are no other alternatives.
-- Posted by Joe Biker on Mon, May 4, 2009, 11:51 am EST

report this comment



Last week vermont was claimed to be the greenest state in the country, what a joke. The only reason vermont thinks it's green is because the ones who own their little piece don't want anyone else to change theirs. I say take these fools protesting, disconnect their power and give them a generator hooked up to a bicycle, and if they want electricity tell them to jump on and start pumping.
-- Posted by ex-vermonter None on Sun, May 3, 2009, 4:18 pm EST

report this comment



I just hope the same ppl protesting VT Yankee aren't ALSO now complaining about windmills. I mean, we need to get power from SOMEWHERE, don't we?
-- Posted by mark on Sun, May 3, 2009, 10:16 am EST

report this comment



If only it were that simple. When Vermonters think of wind towers, they think of Searsburg. Those are .5 MW, and the wind industry in the U.S. isn't making them anymore. Now they're 1.5 MW - 2.5 MW (that's what has been approved for Sheffield). Go see some, listen to them, and talk to people who live around them. They are huge compared to Searsburg, people in Maine with 1.5 MW turbines complain they can't sleep at night because of the noise. It doesn't help that wind developers claim there is no noise. The question is what scale is appropriate for Vermont? The commenter who said put up a few and see what they're like is saying what a lot of people who are impacted by this huge proposal are saying. Most people are not against wind, but the size of what is being proposed is enormous compared to every other proposal in the state. If people aren't getting together to talk about the issue, there's something wrong with them. We need solutions, not another project for people to fight against.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, May 3, 2009, 9:41 am EST

report this comment



This is a crazy issue, there are certain places in the state that are windy, the sun will come up tomorrow. These are very simple facts, this is free energy. How can people not want to tap into this is beyond me.
If I was on one of these properties, a purchase of a windmill from Southwest Windpower in AZ for about 12,000 would pay for itself in a matter of 3-5 years just by converting the house to electric heat. These would only stand anywhere from 30 to 120 ft tall. Simple, sell a small chunck of land to the big windturbine company, then spend the money on 3 or 4 small windmills, install and enjoy free heat all winter long while getting a nice little paycheck back all year from feeding energy back into the grid.
-- Posted by doc johnson None on Sun, May 3, 2009, 9:30 am EST

report this comment



Monitoring devices should be used. And they should be allowed to use them everywhere to see where there are good locations for development. (Private Property and ALL! It's time to plan and act on our future, TODAY!))

If your area doesn't get much wind. Don't fret it. If your area is always windy, and always has a steady breeze. Then consider yourself lucky. They may offer you A LOT of money for your land.

In the end. Vermont needs to get onboard with Wind Power. If we are going to lose an area's 'Beauty'. It better be worth it. It better be the 'BEST POSSIBLE PLACES' for such a development. Or it would just be a waste of time, money, beauty, and effort.

The town that finally passes this should get full benefit from it. Surrounding towns should not get a benefit from it if they are not willing to "Use" them. (Places like Woodstock. Which I'm sure will not want them.)

Some towns may not meet minimum requirements to make it even worth installing Wind Power.

I think they need to spend more time monitoring and even lower the size of their proposed development at first. Let's test, build a few, and then see how they do before building 60 on a hilltop!
-- Posted by None None on Sun, May 3, 2009, 8:06 am EST

report this comment



AGAIN, IT IS THE SAME OLD STORY. THERE HAVE TO BE CHANGES, OR ALL OF US WILL GO BANKRUPT, BUT GOOD OLD VERMONT,
DIE HARDS.
-- Posted by MO on Sat, May 2, 2009, 11:34 pm EST

report this comment



Have you considered this project and its developer might have problems? Instead of the knee-jerk reaction that the commenters are so far spouting, you might want to learn what this developer did that resulted in a landowner going to the Ira selectboard to complain that monitoring devices were put on his land without his permission. Go figure why the reporter didn't include that in this article. Says more about the state of Rutland Herald's diminished news reporting than anything else. If some wealthy developer trampled on property rights in your neighborhood, maybe you'd be getting together with people to talk about how to deal with it, too.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, May 2, 2009, 11:06 am EST

report this comment



This is no different from anything else - at first blush, all say "What a great idea!", then "Not in my backyard"
-- Posted by Roger Widlow on Sat, May 2, 2009, 10:54 am EST

report this comment



Smith has enough hot air in her for us to hook up the turbines to her and run the states electrical needs without any other method. She is opposed to everything else. You shure Mansons' hippie girlfriends were all rounded up?

And Bart, although your post is dead on I'd like to remind you that the working Vermonter has for the most part left for those alien states to make a living as the syrup and post card jobs are all filled.
-- Posted by Danny Russel on Sat, May 2, 2009, 10:22 am EST

report this comment



All you folks do is complain about everything. You don't want nuclear power from which Vermont receives 71% of their electricity. (Go to NPR.org and check out the article "Power hungry: reinventing the U.S. electric grid). Vermont is trying to move forward with alternative forms of electricity. If you are going to cease using one source, you sure as heck better have something with which to replace it. Or else, our electric bills are going to skyrocket. Most Vermonters can not afford this increase.
So, I suggest you pack up your bags and do your bellyaching somewhere else.
-- Posted by Jo Coleman on Sat, May 2, 2009, 10:05 am EST

report this comment



Annette Smith and her hippie wannaby cronies need to get another hobby other than being full time opposers. Of course, Annette, when not lemon farming in Vermont, makes her living doing this. Check out her website. She takes Visa and Mastercard. Not many people can make a living in Vermont lemon farming, so it would be nice if there were jobs. And clean energy. I wish the Herald would stop giving press to her as if she were credible.
-- Posted by Ima_Fended on Sat, May 2, 2009, 9:53 am EST

report this comment



The Nation should take a lesson from Vermont regarding immigration... unfortunately our "aliens" came from New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and some parts of Massachusetts. It doesn't take much to ***** up your way of life, just some slick talkers that make their way into local and state politics who think they know more about how you should live your life than you do. So, let's just sit back and debate these things in the same way we did such things as the bypass around Rutland (for the last 45 years) and wait for the rolling blackouts and high electric bills. But heck, if it gets that bad we can all gather 'round the wood fire and sing Kumbaya and everything will be okay.

Oh, and just in case you "intellectuals" didn't know, Canada, just to our north, needs your help - AND they have socialized medicine already! Saddle up.
-- Posted by Bart Logan on Sat, May 2, 2009, 9:28 am EST

report this comment



"This was like somebody walked up to you and said, 'Guess what, you've got a big tumor and we're going to operate tomorrow,'"

What a mellow dramatic baby
-- Posted by None None on Sat, May 2, 2009, 7:43 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout