RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Omya eyes new location for tailings facility



Toolbox

By Bruce Edwards STAFF WRITER - Published: May 9, 2009

PITTSFORD — Omya Inc. on Friday filed an application with the state for a new tailings management facility to dispose of its future marble waste.

Omya filed the application with the Agency of Natural Resources for full certification to manage its tailings operation. The company currently manages its marble waste or tailings from its Florence calcium carbonate operation under an interim certification that was issued in October.

The application for a five-year full certification identifies a location on top of the current tailings management areas. It was selected after an evaluation of 33 other properties.

The company said in a statement outlining its proposed certification that the Florence plant site was the only site that "complied with the technical requirements of Vermont's Solid Waste Management Rules and other parameters."

Plans call for construction of a single composite geomembrane liner system over the existing tailings combined with a leachate collection system.

Omya is building a $10 million dewatering facility that will purge 90 percent of the water from the tailings, to be pumped back into the plant for reuse. The tailings will then be deposited in the lined site, or if practical sold for commercial use.

Over the years, Omya has dumped millions of tons of marble waste or tailings in old unlined quarries on its property. That practice prompted neighbors of the calcium carbonate plant to express concerns about possible groundwater pollution.

Residents Concerned About Omya filed suit in federal court to stop the dumping and to force the company to take corrective action. The court is considering options to resolve neighbors' concerns.

Those neighbors also appealed Omya's interim solid waste management certification to the state Environmental Court.

The two-year interim certification issued in October allows the company to continue to dispose of and manage its tailings. The interim certification could be renewed for an additional two years.

David Mears, who represents Residents Concerned About Omya, said Friday that an expert who testified on behalf of neighbors in the federal court case said that just capping the existing waste is not a solution.

"It's putting a new waste pile on top of old waste piles," Mears said, "which essentially makes it a permanent situation that you're going to have the waste that's already in the groundwater causing contamination is there for all time."

Mears, director of the Environmental and Natural Resources Law Clinic at Vermont Law School, said Residents Concerned About Omya asked the court to order the company to undertake additional studies to ensure that leaving the existing waste in place is the best possible option.

Omya spokeswoman Linda Pleiman said Friday that remediation of the existing tailings isn't necessary.

"We don't believe based on exhaustive studies that remediation is necessary now or in the future," Pleiman said from company headquarters in Cincinnati.

The company continues to cite a $2.5 million, state-mandated study with multiple stakeholders participating that concluded last year that the Florence operation poses no threat to human health or the environment.

But in his ruling last year, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jerome Niedermeier ruled that "the uncontroverted evidence shows that there is at least some form of harm to the environment and humans" and that some kind of remedial action is required.

bruce.edwards@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


I'd rather tax a business less that is bringing a lot of jobs. And tax them less to keep the good, clean business here. And continue to do that while they stay in the area.

But any company not willing to follow the LAW and if they are knowingly poluting our land. They need to get fined everyday they are not operating up to code.

What the hell is an interim certification? And how many more times are you going to allow them to renew this? How much damage do they have to do to our land before they are responsible to follow the law?

Remember, there is not a lot of people that live in that area. And ALL of them are on Wells.......

So you can think, "There is not many people in the area. We can deal with it when the time comes."

But all you are doing is creating more of a future problem. More headaches for our children.

Stop collecting bribes and money under the table. Get this resolved the correct way. Make them clean up their mess. Make them line the whole area. Make them do the work before it becomes "OUR PROBLEM". Because you know someday they could just walk away and not have any responsiblity to that mess. With your "Interim Certification" ********.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, May 9, 2009, 12:51 pm EST

report this comment



It's funny how the local government will not allow any new companies to come in and bring jobs. Because of Act 250, blah blah blah!

But they are totally willing to keep This Company here and keep allowing them to run AGAINST THE LAW.

So what kind of incentive does this company give you? How much many are they pushing your way? Do you guys receive large kick backs or bonus' from this company?

Or are you afraid if you ask them to do the job right that they will pick up and leave? And then you will lose whatever incentive they give you?

What's the deal?
-- Posted by None None on Sat, May 9, 2009, 12:37 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout