RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Brooke's death sparked tougher laws



Cassandra Adams of West Braintree poses with a picture of her daughter, Brooke Bennett, who was killed last year.

SARAH HINCKLEY / Times Argus

Toolbox

By Peter Hirschfeld VERMONT PRESS BUREAU - Published: June 25, 2009

On March 9, Bennington County prosecutors charged a 55-year-old man with the rape of a 12-year-old girl.

Michael R. Williams' alleged crime wasn't anomalous. In 2007 alone, according to the Agency of Human Services, more than 320 Vermont children suffered some form of sexual abuse.

Williams' potential punishment, however, was more unusual. Statutory reforms signed into law just weeks before his arrest created a new crime of aggravated sexual assault on a minor. Williams could be sentenced to a 25-year mandatory minimum prison term under the new law, one of dozens of reforms enacted following the rape and murder of 12-year-old Brooke Bennett.

"We have seen a definite shift in the way Corrections, the way courts and the way law enforcement handles issues of sexual violence in this state," says Sen. Dick Sears, a Bennington County Democrat. "Brooke Bennett's terrible rape and murder really did provide the momentum for a generational change in how we do business."

Public outrage over the Bennett tragedy spawned a pair of bills during the last legislative session that stiffened prison terms, reformed corrections policies, changed court procedures and dedicated new resources to law enforcement.

The new laws include prohibitions against sex trafficking and sexual exploitation of minors – a law Washington County prosecutors used in May to bring charges against a 54-year-old Twinfield Union High School teacher.

Come July, the number of names on the state's Internet sex offender registry will increase five-fold. Vermont courts will soon begin collecting DNA samples from anyone charged with a felony. And lawmakers will set to work in January on the development of a new violence-prevention curriculum to be implemented in every public school in the state.

The reforms also look to improve victims' experiences in the criminal justice system. The creation of special-investigation units will make for better cases, officials say, and offer victims the kind of broad support they need. The new legislation also ends a long-standing requirement that forced juvenile victims to submit to depositions from defense lawyers.

"We looked across the spectrum to identify places we could strengthen protections for Vermont's children," Sears said. "It's difficult to pick out any single item – it's really their collective impact that's going to have the greatest effect."

The latest incarceration rates suggest that some of the reforms are already having an impact. As of last week, Vermont had 57 more sex offenders behind bars than it did this time last year; the number of violent offenders serving time is up by 69. The increases – noteworthy in a state that has a relatively low inmate population of 2,200 – reflect an attitudinal shift among judges, prosecutors, Corrections officials and police, according to John Perry with the Vermont Department of Corrections.

"I think it's safe to say that the criminal justice system as a whole has responded to the Brooke Bennett tragedy with longer sentences and more incarceration than in the past," Perry says. "And it's not just sex offenders, it's also other kinds of violence."

Perry said sentencing data isn't yet available to prove his thesis. But given the downward trajectory in violent crime rates, Perry said, it's unlikely the increased figures are due to an influx of new offenders. More likely, according to Perry, they're just spending more time in jail.

"In terms of actual crimes committed, I don't think there's been much difference – the violent crime rate is actually down," Perry said. "So what's changed is the use of incarceration for violent offenders and sex offenders."

Shortly after police uncovered Bennett's body from a shallow grave near her alleged killer's Randolph Center home, Sears' Senate Judiciary Committee convened a series of summer legislative hearings. Testimony and evidence gathered during the months-long process yielded a pair of omnibus reform bills that, according to many politicians and advocates, represent some of the most sweeping statutory reforms in decades.

"By any measure, Vermont is a much more hostile place to sex offenders than it has been in years past," says Secretary of Human Services Rob Hofmann, whose umbrella agency includes the Department of Corrections.

Hofmann, commissioner of Corrections during the summer hearings, helped oversee changes in a department that came under intense scrutiny for its handling of Bennett's alleged killer, Michael Jacques.

He attributes the recent increase in incarceration rates among sex offenders in part to policies enacted following the Bennett tragedy. Among them are a centralized system for reviewing sex-offender cases, and a new statutory requirement that forces high-risk offenders to serve at least 70 percent of their maximum sentences.

"More beds in Vermont prisons are being dedicated to incarcerating sex offenders," said Hofmann, who noted that the number of nonviolent offenders serving time has decreased over the past year. "We're seeking alternatives for nonviolent offenders to free up room for violent offenders. While some sex offenders can be adequately managed in the community, there is a preference and desire on the part of the Vermont public to see incarceration longer, and we've been devoting increasing amounts of prison space to doing just that."

Hofmann said the department has also strengthened ties with the Department of Children and Families as well as law enforcement officials to lessen the risk of recidivism by offenders released back into Vermont communities.

The efforts now under way, he says, seek to prevent people like Jacques from manipulating the system.

"The Jacques case is an example of someone who was masterful at manipulating his family, manipulating the criminal justice system, including certainly the Department of Corrections. And it's an area we continually have to seek advances … in terms of supervision as well as to develop treatment to help them control their perverse inclinations and seek ways to safely re-enter them into the community."

In addition to Corrections reforms and harsher prison sentences, lawmakers focused on the creation of special investigation units to enhance the state's ability to charge sexual violence cases. The bill included $1.5 million in new funding for state police and SIU grants.

Special investigation units now exist in some form in every county except Addison. The units bring together police, victims' advocates, nurses and special prosecutors to develop cases against offenders and provide appropriate treatment to victims and their families.

Detective Sgt. Ingrid Jonas of the state police occupies a position, created last year, that oversees the development of SIUs. Since April 1, she says, state police have dedicated three specially trained detectives for sex-crime investigations in Bennington, Windsor, Orange and Lamoille counties. On July 1, another detective devoted solely to sex crimes will be assigned to Essex and Orleans counties.

"I feel really good about it and think we're moving in the right direction," Jonas says. "We've seen how important this approach is to addressing these types of cases, and we know we can't go back to old way where we just hope that whoever gets assigned the case has the skills and expertise to work it the right way."

Sarah Kenney, public policy coordinator for the Vermont Network Against Sexual and Domestic Violence, says her organization is particularly happy with the prevention efforts contained in the 2009 legislation.

"We know we need to prevent violence before it happens," Kenney says. "And that's going to require a significant change in the way we approach prevention efforts."

The new curriculum likely won't reach communities and classrooms for a couple years, Kenney says, but the legislation lays the foundation for a more effective approach.

Hofmann and Sears both say Bennett's murder helped expose an underlying truth that should help all Vermonters protect their children from violence in the first place – more than 95 percent of all sexual assaults on juveniles are committed by someone close to the child.

"We had been looking at sex crimes I think in terms of stranger-danger, teaching kids to be careful of the guy in the white van who might be trying to lure you to see a puppy," Sears says. "In fact 95 to 99 percent of these crimes are perpetrated by someone well known to victim. I think having that knowledge is a huge sea change."

Hofmann says the public awareness that sprouted from the Bennett case may be its most important legacy.

"If I could keep one single thing coming out of this tragedy, it would be for every parent to have the admittedly uncomfortable discussion with their kids that most people who do these terrible acts are not strangers," Hofmann says. "It's something probably the single biggest step they could take to make children safer."








READER COMMENTS


Linda,
All sex offenders should never see the light of day again? Really? The highschool kid in the North Kingdom who mooned a friend from the school bus, she should never see the light of day? The young man in Barre who, at 19, had consentual sex with his 15 yr old girlfriend, who is now his wife and mother of his children, he should have never seen the light of day again? What happened to Brooke was a horrible thing. People like that guy have a special place in hell, but there are quite a few people on the registry that hardly deserve to be there. it is amazing just what some states will consider a "sex crime" though.
-- Posted by firedog on Fri, Jun 26, 2009, 5:49 am EST

report this comment



Colleen, you rock girl! You read my mind exactly! This dumb broad KNEW that Uncle Fester was a CSO and still allowed her precious daughter near him and I don't give a crap if he was married to my sister or not, he would have NEVER, EVER been near my child and I am as disgusted as you are that she feels she is a victim in all this as I think she is a low-life and a terrible mother and if only charges could be levied on her, at the very least indifference right up to child endangerment and I would say this to her face, she is never going to get an ounce of sympathy out of me and I agree, seeing her holding that picture of Brooke just got me riled up, and very sad when I saw the picture of that sweet faced innocent child who suffered greatly. So Herald, you can stop right here, trying to rum her spin. Instead, with the clout that you the media has, hold these lawmakers to their word, and for sure, report on every sexual abuse case involving children. make sure the names of the scumbags that are the abusers are front page news and cover every second of their trials and let it be known that the public is no longer going to stand for these scumbags to be given the ever popular probation to FOUR MONTH SENTENCES for the rape or molestation of an innocent child. And if they kill the child because of their twisted minds, then they automatically should be given a death sentence, they are beyond redemption and it will be all about punishment. I don't care if more prisons have to be built, you can't put a price on a child's life and time and time again, till they finally kill the child because sexually abusing them is not enough to get them off, people like Uncle Fester were given light sentences or never serve the full amount of time they should, it still pisses me off to know that dirtbag only served 3 years of a 6-20 for raping a young woman, but the guy who sold a joint to another adult will serve most of his sentence and then when released will probably be on FSU and watched like a hawk. If it was up to me, all SEX OFFENDERS would never be in society again and NH is coming around and involuntarily committing their sex predators to the State Hospital instead of just releasing them and by doing this, they are saving many lives and certainly the innocence of a child. We all know that most of these dirtbags will max out on their sentences because they know they will not be supervised, thus, free to roam and rape again and it is not a case of if, it is a case of when and I commend NH for doing this and several states including mine has been doing it for awhile and it is working, sexual assaults on children is down compared to say, ten years ago. So, all you lawmakers, please live up to word and not just use this as a political ploy to get re-elected, it could be your kid that ends up like poor Brooke.
-- Posted by Linda Brown on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 9:39 pm EST

report this comment



I feel sorry for the family because of their loss. I agree that he should never have been around ANY child, even his own. Her mother is suffering enough by losing her daughter, and most put blame on her, but in reality, her father and other family memebers also knew what was at stake. I don't put the blame on any of her family, I put it on the State of Vermont for letting a creep like this out and not keeping track of him like they should have from the start.
-- Posted by Rebecca Brown on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 11:23 am EST

report this comment



I agree with Colleen and company.

Brooke Bennetts family failed to protect her from Jacques.

There is no way the Jacques should have had access to any of her children. It was her responsibilty to insure that.

She failed. Is she a victim? Probably, but she's a victim because of her own actions and her daughter paid the price. Hopefully we never need to see this woman again.
-- Posted by Dave None on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 11:02 am EST

report this comment



Kevin, do you have children? Do you have a daughter? Do you realize that the only thing that matters in this world is raising them safely and with love? You can think I am a troll all you want. I know where my kids are 24 hours a day, and who they are hanging out with- as every parent should. It was never kept a secret that this guy was a sex offender- it is on the Vermont sex offender website, along with a picture and their status. I have pity for this woman, because she seems to enjoy her victim status-( and how pathetic is that....) But I weep for Brooke, because she was let down by everyone who was supposed to be looking out for her well being. And they failed their jobs miserably.
-- Posted by Colleen Wright on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 10:23 am EST

report this comment



I also agree with Ms. Wright. In small town Vermont, everyone knows everyone else, and these two were related! He was a known sex offender. DO you really think Brooke's mother did not know? All she knew was what he told her, right? I wonder how many people in jail think they are there because their victim "overreacted".

By her own admission her mother knew Jacques was in jail for something that happened "on a date." Even knowing only that I still wouldn't allow my daughter to go hang out with someone like that - alone or accompanied by someone else. Because I sure as hell wouldn't buy that "the victim overreacted" BS. Would you, Mr. Spaulding?
-- Posted by Amy Grover on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 9:16 am EST

report this comment



It's all a sad situation. These freaks manipulate the weak minded. THe man was in her family. When something like this happens in families, unfortunately, they sometimes get brushed under the carpet because of embarrassment or whatever they try to justify it with. But the truth is your family should know you better than anyone in the world. Just like the nanny in VT that molested a 10 yr old. His family knew he "showed interest in children". Give me a break.
-- Posted by SB None on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 8:42 am EST

report this comment



her mother also said that he was never alone with her. how did she know she wasn't there. I don't care any type of an attack on a female or a male, i would never leave my children alone. to me this mother should get charged with assisting him in raping her. This mother knew of his history just like the one going on know where the mom sex offender and 4 year old left the mim knew and said he needed a second chance. now she is saying that it wasn't until after they were on the road that she found out he was
Brooke mom can say what she wants, it is a cover up
-- Posted by Michelle Burnett on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 6:20 am EST

report this comment



"When asked if she knew about Jacques' past, Adams admits to knowing only as much as her brother-in-law told her. She knew he had spent time in jail. Jacques told his wife's family that the jail time was the result of an overreaction by a woman with whom he had gone on a date.I had no idea how brutal that so-called innocent date was," said Adams about the incident where Jacques held a woman at knifepoint while he raped her, according to court records."

Colleen,Normally I would not attack anyone's opinion but Perhaps if you tried to understand the entire situation and did a little investigation of the facts you wouldn't come across as the TROLL you seem to be.Perhaps its time you went and hid back underneath that bridge as you seem incapable of making an intelligent reply to such a sad tragedy. Sometimes the greatest mistakes we can make are in trusting others to be honest with us.
-- Posted by Kevin Spaulding on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 4:00 am EST

report this comment



Actually, the biggest step a parent can take is to NOT ALLOW a SEX OFFENDER near their child. Every time I see this woman in print, it makes me ill. She knew the background of Jacques, and still allowed her daughter to be alone with him. She is as guilty as he....
-- Posted by Colleen Wright on Thu, Jun 25, 2009, 3:09 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout