RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Union eyes jobs at Rutland hospital



Toolbox

By DANIEL BARLOW Vermont Press Bureau - Published: July 7, 2009

MONTPELIER — If Rutland Regional Medical Center takes on some of the patients from the troubled Vermont State Hospital, the union representing state workers hopes to get first dibs on the jobs there.

The Vermont State Employees Association, the union representing about 8,000 state workers, told hospital officials in a letter last month that their members should get hiring priority if they build a new psychiatric wing.

Jes Kraus, the president of VSEA, also told the hospital that if this new psychiatric wing opens in Rutland, the organization would try to organize workers there into a labor union.

"In addition, should your proposal be accepted by the Legislature, VSEA will be exploring the possibility of an organizing drive at RRMC," Kraus wrote. "We believe your staff should be afforded all the protections of a union, particularly when VSH employees have the highest rates of injury in state government."

For years, Vermont officials have tried to close the State Hospital in Waterbury, a facility that nearly everyone agrees is inadequate to properly care for the state's most extreme cases of mental disorder and substance abuse. Due to several suicides and other problems at the facility several years ago, it has lost federal funding.

But the details of how exactly to replace the building — and find safe rehabilitative homes for the roughly 50 patients there — have stalled reforms. State officials now hope to build a 15-bed residential facility in Waterbury and offer smaller groups of beds at community hospitals around the state.

"We're making some progress this summer," said Michael Hartman, the commissioner of the Vermont Department of Mental Health. "Between now and the end of the summer, we have meetings planned with providers and consumers and a special group that will be meeting with patients in the hospital."

Hartman said he hopes to have an application for a certificate of need for the new 15-bed facility submitted by early winter — and state law requires either the Joint Fiscal Committee or the Mental Health Oversight Committee of the Legislature to review the details 30 days before they are submitted.

Meanwhile, hospitals in St. Johnsbury and Springfield, along with the Brattleboro Retreat, the largest psychiatric unit in the state, have also expressed interest in taking on some patients and beds — if the price is right.

That's a big change from a few months ago when it seemed as if few, if any, hospitals in the state were truly interested in operating residential psychiatric units. Hartman said as the Rutland portion of the project moves forward, other hospital officials have expressed interest.

"As the Rutland concept gained some more clarity, other hospitals have expressed more interest in being players here," he said.

The VSEA opposes the plan put forward by Gov. James Douglas' administration to send VSH beds to private hospitals.

In the union's letter to Rutland Regional Medical Center President Thomas Huebner, Kraus writes that the union hopes the state will shift gears and instead build a new "state-of-the-art facility that retains the experience and expertise of current staff while preserving a safety net for all Vermonters with acute mental illness."

Kraus also wrote that the union will ask the Legislature to pass a bill giving VSH workers hiring priority and allowing them to retain their status as state employees if the Rutland hospital goes forward with its plans.

"This would mirror the public-private partnership that the state currently has with Fletcher Allen Health Care, whose psychiatrists work closely with state employees at VSH," the letter reads.

Huebner is out of the office this week and could not be reached for comment, according to a spokesperson at the Rutland hospital.

Hartman declined to endorse the possible VSEA legislation, but said he gets the message sent by the union. There are numerous employees at the State Hospital with valuable experience and, if and when the hospital closes, he doesn't want to lose that expertise.

"We have employees who have been working there for 20 or 30 years," Hartman said. "We'll want to keep them and their knowledge in the system."

daniel.barlow@rutlandherald.com.








READER COMMENTS


These are the same people who refused to implement the required steps mandated by the feds to the Waterbury facility. Therefore, a failure to be federally certified and loss of millions in medicaid reimbursement. Those same fed standards are uniform in all states. Now this same union wants a crack at Rutland Hospital? No way. The problem with state unions and city unions they work so diligently on preventing necessary work from being done, and in this case it's deadly.
-- Posted by Curious gt on Wed, Jul 8, 2009, 10:12 am EST

report this comment



I don't think the union is talking about medical professionals. Those contracts are put out to bid, and we have seen the results of picking the cheapest bidder has affected the residents by the huge amount in lawsuit damages awarded. Again, it can't be said enough, how mismanagement that whole facility is in Waterbury is, then to solicite the legislator to give them priority in hiring, when those same people are the cause of the facility closing, seems perverted. To bring in union workers dedicated to not working for the best interests of the patient, against the best interests of those same patients and the Rutland facility, charged with their care.
-- Posted by Curious gt on Wed, Jul 8, 2009, 10:07 am EST

report this comment



Agree with all posters so far- how about we identify the primary issues that individuals are struggling with and then choose the best provider in the area with the most experience dealing with that same issue. For instance, there are a few psychotherapists who deal with very specific issues like Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and so the individual patient struggling with OCD should have the opportunity to receive treatment from the most qualified professional not someone who happens to belong to a union. Our education system is famous (or infamous) for doing the same thing- supporting a pathetic, unionized teacher over a non-union one who happens to be an incredilble educator. Suggesting that a law be passed to assure "first dibs" is even more audacious.
-- Posted by just sayin on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 6:54 pm EST

report this comment



What a crock of ****, This union sounds like a bully trying to take away jobs that should be available Anyone who is qualified, not because they are in this crooked sounding union.
-- Posted by None None on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 12:48 pm EST

report this comment



The care for psychiatric patients may be publicly funded (medicaid) but the facility is private. The State has yet to get Federally accredidation for the last who knows years with these same union employees at the helm of the Waterbury facility. Huebner should make it perfectly clear the hospital will be in charge of care and hiring, not state employee unions who have done such a poor job of taking care of those who cannot take care of themselves that the State has poored out millions in lawsuit damages. Are these the type of people, we want in our area making decisions on some of the most dangerous people/or people inclined to hurt themselves or others considering the federally forced closure of the Waterbury facility for inability to meet the very basics of standards. Rutland Hospital would be doing the state a very big favor, putting the community at risk with unsupervised mentally ill and should perhaps walk away from this scenerio.
-- Posted by Curious gt on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 11:01 am EST

report this comment



These would also be the very same unions, that only vote for one party. That party happens to be the majority in Montpeculier. He might just get his law passed.
-- Posted by Frank Westcott on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 9:59 am EST

report this comment



Rutland Hospital is a private vacility, not an extension of a state. All we need right now are union crooks in the mental health field. They've done such a great job in Waterbury the state (taxpayers) has been sued dozens of times for their mistreatment or nontreatment of inmates under state care. Need more of that, don't we. What we need to do is cut another 4000 state employees to come in line with the population size of our state a minut 650,000.
-- Posted by Curious gt on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 9:21 am EST

report this comment



To sugguest the legislature pass a law favoring one specific group of people is the height of discrimination.If a new facility is public funded those that desire to work there need to get in line,file an application and if their qualifications are inline with current re education standards they too will be considered. Having 20-30 years on the job is valuable experience but that could be part of the problem the old facility suffered under.Unions in healthcare are one of the reasons cost control is so difficult.
-- Posted by bruce meyer on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 9:09 am EST

report this comment



With the economy in tough shape, unions should take a step back and see if its in their best interest to keep people working (and paying their union dues) or hold out for more money and lose those jobs.
-- Posted by Colleen Wright on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 8:07 am EST

report this comment



This Jes Kraus and his union have brass stones..... Maybe if they actually current state employees actually did their jobs properly, the Waterbury facility wouldn't have lost its funding.

All this article conveys is whats wrong with govenrment. I'd say the so called people that were there for 20 or 30 years are part of the problem and not part of the solution.

This is a steaming pile of horse droppings......

"Kraus also wrote that the union will ask the Legislature to pass a bill giving VSH workers hiring priority and allowing them to retain their status as state employees if the Rutland hospital goes forward with its plans."

Here's some advice Jes..... Stop with the unrealistic demands and posing, they make you look like an moron.

Oh, wait, maybe you just are a moron....
-- Posted by Dave None on Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 8:05 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout