RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Driving the gauntlet

Town along Route 4 collects $232,715 in speeding fines



Chief Deputy Thomas Herb of the Windsor County Sheriff's Department uses a hand-held radar gun to clock traffic on Route 4 in Bridgewater on Friday. Herb said the advantage of the hand-held radar is he can show the clocked speed to a motorist.

PHOTO BY VYTO STARINSKAS

Toolbox

By Josh O'Gorman STAFF WRITER - Published: July 26, 2009

BRIDGEWATER —Running north and south, the Green Mountains limit a motorist's options to travel between the eastern and western parts of the state. The options that remain offer mountaintop vistas and winding riverside drives.

But a combination of location and law enforcement has also provided one small town along Route 4 an opportunity to make $1,000 a week last year in traffic fines.

For many years, Bridgewater has contracted with the Windsor County Sheriff's Department to provide speed enforcement in town. During the past fiscal year ending June 30, the town paid $179,100 to the Sheriff's Department and received $232,715 in revenue from speeding fines, a net profit of $53,615.

Bridgewater is one of six towns in Windsor County — along with Barnard, Cavendish, Plymouth, Pomfret and Redding — to contract with the Sheriff's Department for speed enforcement. Each town pays a flat rate of $41 an hour, and for the past two years, Bridgewater contracted for 12 hours a day, seven days a week.

"They tell us where to go, and we go there," said Sheriff Michael Chamberlain, who oversees the five full-time deputies who provide speed enforcement for the towns that contract with his department. "We could go in and patrol and might not ever write a ticket, and the town would still have to pay for our services."

Of the other towns that contract with the Sheriff's Department, however, none make a profit like Bridgewater. Barnard, which contracts for eight hours a week, paid $16,764 for the fiscal year ending June 2008 — the most recent numbers available — and received $17,141 in revenue, a profit of $377. Plymouth saw a profit of $352 for the most recent fiscal year ending June 30, paying $69,431 and receiving $69,783.

Three other towns — Reading, Pomfret and Cavendish — lost money in their traffic enforcement efforts, losing $9,688, $10,029 and $17,431 respectively.

"It's not a money-making proposition and it's not intended to be a money-making proposition," said Richard Svec, town manager for Cavendish, where police focus their speed enforcement on Route 131 through the villages of Cavendish and Proctorsville, along 20 Mile Stream Road and Depot Street.

While it might cost the town money, Svec said, it is still a wise investment.

"Cavendish used to have its own police force more than 30 years ago but it was cost-prohibitive," he said. "This is a good way to provide an affordable police presence."

Bridgewater Selectwoman Mary Oldenburg also said traffic enforcement is not about the money.

"The money is not the issue. The issue is safety," she said. "We're not trying to make this a money-making thing, but it has turned out that way the last few years."

During the last five years, the town has made $147,703 in profit from speeding fines from 12,515 tickets. While a handful was written by Vermont State Police or Division of Motor Vehicles Enforcement, nearly all were written by the Windsor County Sheriff's Department.

Sheriff Chamberlain is quick to point out that his department never sees the money from the fines, which are sent to the Traffic Bureau in White River Junction. The state then returns the money directly to the towns using different formulas depending upon the type of ticket issued. In some cases, nearly all the money returns to the town. Other times, the money is pooled and divided among the towns based upon a ratio of the money a town spends on law enforcement versus what it pays in property taxes.

While it doesn't receive the revenue from the tickets, the Windsor County Sheriff's Department did receive nearly $179,100 from Bridgewater last year. However, Sheriff Chamberlain denied any implication that the town pressures his department to turn a profit.

"They've never said to me, 'Sheriff, if you don't make us money, you're gone,'" he said.

So how does Bridgewater generate so many tickets and so much revenue? Even accounting for the high number of hours they contract for — more in a day than Barnard, Pomfret or Redding do in a week — Bridgewater consistently sees profit margins of between 10 percent and 30 percent.

"There's just a lot more volume, and with that volume you're going to have a lot more speeding," Chamberlain said of the Route 4 corridor, arguably the most expedient way to cross the state. While it is a four-lane divided highway as it passes through western towns, such as Castleton and Fair Haven, on the east side of Rutland it becomes a regular two-lane highway, crossing over Sherburne Pass in Killington.

Drivers typically has a good head of steam by the time they reach the bottom of the pass, and the straight, flat road gives them little reason to brake. As Route 4 enters Bridgewater from the west, it has wide shoulders for cyclists and pedestrians, but those shoulders narrow as the speed limit decreases to 40 mph. The speed limit is clearly posted, except for those drivers coming from Plymouth on Route 100A, whose speed limit sign is hidden for most of the year behind the leaves of a tree.

Within a mile, the speed limit drops to 35 mph and then to 25 mph in front of the Bridgewater Village School. The wide shoulder several miles to the west has disappeared and the highway, now looking like any number of village Main Streets in the state, is lined with businesses and houses, some less than 20 feet from the edge of the road. With no sidewalk, pedestrians and cyclists either travel in the road or along the thin dirt strip on either side.

The speed limits themselves on Route 4 are not set by the town, but by the state. John Zicconi, a spokesman for the Agency of Transportation, said traffic engineers set speed limits based upon their surveys of the speeds drivers travel, the area surrounding the road and accident history.

Speed appears to have contributed to many crashes on Route 4 in Bridgewater. According to the Agency of Transportation, there were 75 crashes between 2000 and 2008, resulting in 39 injuries and no fatalities. Of those crashes, 27 were due to either exceeding the speed limit or driving too fast for conditions.

So while the Sheriff's Department sees no profit from the tickets it writes and the town hasn't created the situation that forces drivers to cut their speed in half, it does appear the town is using the situation to its advantage. Oldenburg said Bridgewater uses the ticket revenue for road projects within the town, including a recently completed project on Bridgewater Center Road and another on Gold Coast Road.

"It lets us do these projects without taxing these people out of their homes," Oldenburg said.

And how do the locals feel about a police presence that has written on average nearly seven tickets a day for the last five years?

"Some people are happy. Other people think they're overzealous. But people should know they're here," Oldenburg said.



In the interest of full disclosure, it should be noted that this reporter received a speeding ticket earlier this year in Bridgewater.

josh.ogorman@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


You should pickup a Driver Handbook, Major Taxpayer.

Each state has different laws.
-- Posted by CF Reality on Wed, Jul 29, 2009, 11:50 pm EST

report this comment



I guess I'm confused.

Solid line violations? Passing on corners?

This is Vermont. Passing is only NOT allowed when it is clearly posted. Usually schools and blind intersections will have "Do Not Pass" signs.

Otherwise, you can pass whenever you feel it's safe. In Vermont the lines are there to help guide you. But you do not have to follow their advice.

Atleast this is how it was 16 years ago when I took Driver's Ed. I don't think it has changed, but I could be wrong.
-- Posted by CF Reality on Wed, Jul 29, 2009, 11:43 pm EST

report this comment



In addition, I also heard that Mary Oldenburg believes the world is flat!
-- Posted by John Jensen on Mon, Jul 27, 2009, 3:22 pm EST

report this comment



I'd say that our friends in Bridgewater have truly found a way to make "public safety" pay! Oops, I stand corrected..."Bridgewater Selectwoman Mary Oldenburg...said traffic enforcement is not about the money."

Thank goodness we've discovered yet another pure hearted public servant whose only objective is to save us from ourselves!

Now for the $64,000 question: Could we please see the raw numbers on total traffic stops, total tickets issues, and total warnings issued? Did our intrepid Herald reporter ever ask that question?

Since the info wasn't included in the article, my guess is that you won't see too many warnings in the data...which just goes to show you that this is merely a matter of public safety -- isn't it???

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Mon, Jul 27, 2009, 9:31 am EST

report this comment



major taxpayer maybe if you weren't a dick to the officer, they wouldn't return the favor. I've dealt with 4 or 5 troopers before and they have all been civil and polite. It always everyone else's fault and never your own, how strange that is huh?
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Jul 27, 2009, 7:54 am EST

report this comment



Well jack maybe they should SLOW DOWN Just because they don't have a record doesnt mean they weren't let off before, that is ridiculous your friends aren't any better then anyone else and should be ticketed if they are BREAKING THE LAW.
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Jul 27, 2009, 7:51 am EST

report this comment



These are the same people that fought against a bypass highway out of fear that their towns would become dead due to no tourist traffic. They have no morals. People I know, who have never even had a parking ticket in 40 years of driving on Vermont roads were not given a warning but were rudely treated by the Deputy 'Dogs' that run this Speed Trap. To all that read this article, do not visit Vermont. Do not come here. As far as the State setting speed limits, that's true on the highway but in the village the Selectmen set policy. This unethical practice needs to end. Safety is not an issue if the bypass is put in. Sounds like a shovel ready project to me. Bury those towns.
-- Posted by Jack Bauer on Mon, Jul 27, 2009, 7:48 am EST

report this comment



Don't speed and you wont get a speeding ticket.
-- Posted by Comfy Anon on Mon, Jul 27, 2009, 6:57 am EST

report this comment



I don't know about locals but the troopers have always been pretty professional. Some of these drivers are serial speeders. How many times would you warn them? And if your kid or pet was hit by a speeder would you be as willing to forgive and forget?
-- Posted by northstar62 on Mon, Jul 27, 2009, 6:43 am EST

report this comment



How many tourist have sworn never to return to Vermont after being ticketed in one of the speed traps along route 4. Do they calculate that into their figures when they think of how much money they made?
-- Posted by ex-vermonter None on Sun, Jul 26, 2009, 10:25 pm EST

report this comment



Me I am just happy that there are not more laser speed guns in Vermont. The radar stuff is pretty easy to avoid if you have a good radar detector.
-- Posted by Mark Wilson on Sun, Jul 26, 2009, 2:24 pm EST

report this comment



Rarely in rural Vermont is any encounter with law enforcement a positive experience. No different then some infamous, backwater, impoverished Southern state, you can find our local federales laying in wait to administer justice.

A motorist speeding, but otherwise driving safely, could just as effectively be reminded to heed the local speed by a friendly warning as a $200 ticket. The ill will generated seriously compromises the cooperation officials need to solve real crimes.

I've witnessed far more dangerous driving by over zealous cops hell bent on catching a motorist then I've ever seen committed by any motorist himself. Tickets should be reserved for those truly putting others at risk, passing on corners, solid line violations, unbuckled children, etc.

Think we would all rather see law enforce out solving real crimes. Canvassing neighborhoods seeking robbery leads. Befriending kids as to know them socially to create a positive bond within the community. Stopping by to lend a helping hand to those in need. Even visiting seasonal homeowners to recognize those they serve.

A huge change is due in rural law enforcement in Vermont. Look for those of us preparing for election.
-- Posted by Major Taxpayer on Sun, Jul 26, 2009, 1:55 pm EST

report this comment



Bridgewater Selectwoman Mary Oldenburg also said traffic enforcement is not about the money.

"The money is not the issue. The issue is safety," she said. "We're not trying to make this a money-making thing, but it has turned out that way the last few years."

Oh sure and yeah right. Mary must think we're a bunch of morons.
-- Posted by Mr. Moderate on Sun, Jul 26, 2009, 1:17 pm EST

report this comment



I hope Bridgewater uses some of the revenue to clear the leaves from the speed limit sign coming from the Plymouth end. If safety is the primary concern maybe some signs that tell motorists that the speed limits are aggressively enforced for their own safety would help and further eliminate any excuses they might make for continuing to speed.

The Sheriff (salaried) and his state paid deputies (paid for prisoner transportation to and from court, jail and detention facilities for juveniles and mentally ill) are the only county and state funded part of a sheriff's department. Sheriffs get a very modest budget and are allowed to contract for services with towns, businesses and individuals. The sheriff can keep a small percentage of the contract price and the rest pays for cruisers, deputy wages, insurance, gas, equipment and other costs. It is a business but provides towns with a much lower operating cost for law enforcement than maintaining a Police Department. If the town has an active constable this can be a less expensive alternative. Also Town constables can contract with surrounding town constables for services if the town is willing to pay them. This has been quite successful in cases like Wallingford's Constable Nelson Tift. In almost all cases Constable Tift was able to generate significant revenue for the towns he contracted with and helped to reduce Rutland County's overall motor vehicle fatality and accident rate in those areas.
-- Posted by Joel Davidson on Sun, Jul 26, 2009, 9:09 am EST

report this comment



Sheriffs are Boys trying to be Men!
-- Posted by True Vermonter on Sun, Jul 26, 2009, 8:35 am EST

report this comment



What is the job of the sheriff's dept.? And who pays for them? I thought that these folks were supposed to be out enforcing the laws. Why do towns have to pay them extra to do what they are supposed to do anyway?

Obviously if you speed you are shouldn't be surprised to get a ticket. Route 4 on top of being a lousy road for visiters and truckers trying to connect with the good highways in adjoining states is a minefield of speed traps and the woodstock PD with their tape measure.
-- Posted by northstar62 on Sun, Jul 26, 2009, 6:43 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout