RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Aubuchon closes after 51 years



Aubuchon Hardware has closed its Rutland store on West Street after 51 years in the area.

ALBERT J. MARRO / RUTLAND HERALD

Toolbox

By STEPHANIE M. PETERS STAFF WRITER - Published: September 2, 2009

After opening its West Street doors for business Tuesday morning, Aubuchon Hardware quickly and quietly shuttered them again midmorning, to the surprise of neighboring businesses and passersby.

And if the brown paper that employees hurriedly taped up inside to cover the glass storefront wasn't enough of a sign of the downtown landmark's departure, the notice on the glass doors confirmed it: "With much regret, we announce the closing of this store location," it read.

Daniel Aubuchon, vice president of retail and distribution center operations, confirmed Tuesday afternoon that after 51 years on West Street, the last few of which were marked by a substantial drop-off in business, the company decided to close the store.

"It was basically (a decision based on) sales," Aubuchon said from the company's Westminster, Mass., headquarters. "There's not really much else to talk about other than sales."

Since 2001, the store had lost about 50 percent of its total sales volume, due largely to the number of shoppers who flow along Route 7 instead of venturing downtown, Aubuchon said.

The shift compelled the company to start searching for an alternate location in Rutland about four years ago, he said.

"We just haven't been able to find the right price at the right location," Aubuchon said. "We were never able to put the kind of store that we like in (the West Street) location."

He did, however, leave open the possibility Tuesday that the company could return to the city in a new home. If at all possible, they'd like to, Aubuchon said.

"If we can find a deal or a piece of land where we can put up our own store, we'd be very happy to come back," he said. "We've certainly enjoyed the Rutland area and the state of Vermont. … We're constantly playing checkers with stores, trying to clean up the low-volume locations."

Mayor Christopher Louras said he began speaking a year ago with a former manager of the Rutland store, who is now a district manager in the company, about their desire to relocate.

"I've offered them any assistance my office can render," he said. "I have been working and will continue to work with their management to find a suitable location so they can re-enter the marketplace in the city. It's very important to the city that Aubuchon Hardware has a presence here."

Other recent moves the company has made within Vermont show that the ideal location is often one with high visibility and where Aubuchon owns its own building or can build a store to its specifications.

Aubuchon gave up its store in Bennington about two years ago. The company still owns the plaza where the store was located and the former hardware store's space is still for rent.

In Manchester, Aubuchon relocated in the spring to a site it owns after renting a store for many years. The company's had "tremendous success" with its new Manchester location on highly trafficked Route 11, Aubuchon said.

In Rutland, the company has been a tenant-at-will at 122 West St. for the past few months, an arrangement that made the decision to close the Rutland store all the easier, Aubuchon said.

The store employed about eight people — two full-time and six part-time — all of whom will be relocated to surrounding stores such as Fair Haven, Brandon or Manchester if they're willing to travel, Aubuchon said.

Mark Foley Sr., CEO of Pistols and Roses, owns The Gryphon Building at the corner of West Street and Merchants Row, where the store was located. He did not return phone calls seeking comment Tuesday afternoon.

However, other longtime presences downtown said they were saddened to learn of another downtown business's closure.

"They've been good neighbors," said James McNeil, co-owner of McNeil and Reedy on Merchants Row, which predates Aubuchon Hardware in downtown Rutland by two years. "We welcomed them when they came to downtown and now it's sad to see them go."

"I just can't imagine them not being here," said Martha Zullo at the Sandwich Shoppe.

Aubuchon Hardware first opened downtown on Nov. 20, 1958, as a two-floor store, with the street-level once occupied by a company-run toy store, Aubuchon said. As the store celebrated its 50th anniversary last year, the company marked the 100th birthday of its beginnings in Fitchburg, Mass.

The company operates 126 stores in six states, including 25 in Vermont, and soon will open a new location in New York, which Aubuchon wouldn't name, where much of Rutland's leftover stock is being shipped.

stephanie.peters@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


Thank you Scott. A systemic change in the way City Government operates seems necessary. We don't need more Redevelopment Authority's, Planning Commissions, Economic Development Commissions, Partnerships and Special Committees or lobbyists. The Aldermen have plenty of committees to deal with these matters; and they answer to the voters. Multiple arms are reaching out for minimal dollars for their individual concerns. In these economic times, less is preferable so long as the arms reaching out are to benefit the majority of the community's taxpayers. Remember when Mayor Godnick brought in Ted Cacioppi as City Planner. Millions of dollars flowed into Rutland for historic renovations, sidewalks, the old parking deck, parks, recreation facilities and more. That was because there was only one central governmental unit that had oversight and control. And the Mayor had full oversight to ensure this person acted responsibly and put in a full days work. We've endured criticism for sniping at city officials. We're not sniping. We are reminding them of their responsibilities. It is difficult not to do so when you hear someone say I don't feel this is in my mission staement. Ideas have been presented; and ignored without response to the presenter. The cold hard reality is "If it isn't their idea, it's no one's idea!" I miss Aubuchons because they knew your name. That means a lot. I still remember when; and feel it could be again.
-- Posted by Ed Larson on Tue, Sep 8, 2009, 5:47 pm EST

report this comment



Ed Larson: very well put.
-- Posted by Scott Frank on Mon, Sep 7, 2009, 3:08 pm EST

report this comment



Walmart's moving out of the city?! Are you for real?! THANK GOD!!

That'd be the best thing to happen to Downtown!! Move them to the old Hannaford location or the Mall (if we must keep them around), put in a train depot where the Bus, Amtrak and VT Transit could access passengers, and Rutland would again be a transportation hub for Central Vermont. I bet even a few more stores could fit in that locale as well. Things would only get better from there.
-- Posted by concerned citizen on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 4:15 pm EST

report this comment



It's too bad about Aubuchon closing in Rutland. The 2 projects Wilton refers to will never happen. Why? lack of quality leadership in Rutland. I don't think any of the individuals in local leadership positions are qualified for them. If there are any it is too few.
Rutland needs to change the government system and hire a city manager. This will help as we can then put some educational and experience criteria into the positions. Same with downtown partnership, RRA, etc. they are just going along making busy to justify their jobs. There is no real creative intiative taking place.
WalMart will soon be moving out of the city. I know that, you know that, what is our leadership doing about it?
-- Posted by Liber Tarian on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 10:50 am EST

report this comment



None...when a person under age 65 loses a job they have the option of continuing their healthcare through COBRA. It's naturally more expensive to the individual because an employer is not subsidizing the cost, but it's available and can tide you over until you secure new employment.

Firedog...I didn't advocate a "100% free market" and I recognize that it's unattainable anyway in the modern era, but I do think marketplaces, when allowed to operate under "fair trade" policies, are more capable of producing better long term outcomes than Governments ever can (largely because our political process has driven Governments to become consumed by short term interests). My point about fair trade is that the playing fields of international trade can be leveled by sound trade policies that address your concerns over the voraciousness of corporate profiteering by giving them pause to consider their domestic responsibilities.

You both have valid points and I actually think we're much more in agreement than first meets the eye...
-
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 9:17 am EST

report this comment



Rutland VT, the all night, all you can buy, drug infested cesspool, gee wonder why businesses are closing.
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 9:10 am EST

report this comment



So... that's it? That's all? The answer to my question about what Louras and Coppinger are trying to do to improve the downtown Rutland business and economic situation is... nothing? Because the only two projects on the table for this entire region are the bazillion-dollar, years-old railyard relocation project and a few fiber optic cables (the same technological wish-and-a-prayer that every other downwardly-spiraling region in America thinks will somehow restore the days of wine and roses)?

Really -- that's all we got?

Good Lord, we're screwed.
-- Posted by That Guy on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 8:49 am EST

report this comment



Regarding economic development for Rutland County/Southern VT there are only two real projects on the table: The relocation of the Rutland Railyard and the develoment of a regional fiber optic network (fiber direct to the home/business), both projects proposed by the RRA. It's up to us, as citizens, to be informed about these projects and support them. We cannot keep our heads in the sand, our world has changed. If our representatives in Montpelier and DC don't see our region supporting these concepts, they won't support it, either. We need tohold our representative accountable for supporting what we really need in VT and especially Rutland--JOBS! Anyone who needs more information about either project can call the RRA at 775-2910 or me at City Hall 773-1800 x231. PS I applaud the group that got energized around the Ethan Allen...hope those same folks can rally for these projects, too.
-- Posted by Wendy Wilton on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 7:52 am EST

report this comment



Bill,
The problem with 100% free market is this. If it takes a company $10 to produce goods here, and $5 to produce it elsewhere, where are they going to produce it? And, are they going to drop the price? no, infact it is kept the same or even raised (gotta pay the shipping charges as well) to keep profit margins high. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. When a corperation is treated as an individual, it becomes power hungry. It eventually comes to a point that, in order to keep investors happy and profits growing, that other companies MUST move their manufacturing to other places where their goods can be made for $5.
-- Posted by firedog on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 2:43 am EST

report this comment



Bill O. Rights --
You hit the nail on the head with everything but health care. If you're under 65 and you lose your job, why the (#*$&@^# should you lose your damn health care??
-- Posted by None None on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 8:36 pm EST

report this comment



Rutland, like many northeastern towns (or towns across America for that matter) that have watched their manufacturing and industrial bases evaporate, are now faced with the proverbial chicken and egg proposition, and it's clear that most politicians and many citizens are thoroughly enamored with and focused on the chicken as the solution.

They continue to pitch the trendy, boutique, and "quality of life" ideas such as retail enterprise zones, mini-parks, bike paths, etc., while completely ignoring the fact there is no presently viable, underlying economic base capable of sustaining it.

Rutland's fate will be shared by more and more of America as we continue to hemorage economically by subsidizing unfair trade policies and saddling businesses and individual taxpayers alike with more taxes, more restrictions, more micro-management, and more centralized planning. The healthcare reform agenda, if successful, will just be another nail in the coffin.

Wealth-creating industries are becoming fewer and fewer in the land of "freedom" while, ironically, they are displacing to and/or growing with alacrity in lands once economically stymied by communism and corruption.

Until Government (at all levels) finally realizes that they not only aren't the solution and, at best, can only partially contribute to it by devising responsible policies that entail getting out of the free market's way, they are destined to not only keep our economic horse saddled with disadvantages, but they'll continue beating it until it dies a miserable death (in some forgotten enterprise zone, on an abandoned bike path, or in a quaint, but overgrown little min-park that time and the economy forgot).
-
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 6:42 pm EST

report this comment



TR mentions below that a new AutoZone store has moved back into our area.
Could someone please tell me where their new location is. Thanks!
-- Posted by Just Me on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 9:21 am EST

report this comment



"That Guy is off base, yet somewhat amusing..Louras and Coppinger are at least trying to improve dt, more than some whiny guy from his PC barking out orders to the Herald is doing."

I guess that's why I'm not Mayor McCheese, eh?

OK, I'll bite. I'd like of list of, say, seven ways in which "Louras and Coppinger are at least trying to improve" the downtown situation.

You can post 'em right here. Deal?
-- Posted by That Guy on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 8:47 am EST

report this comment



Lots of pretty good ideas here.
One I think we all can agree with is that it's important to start thinking about the future, what we want our city to look like in that future (30 years, not next year), develop an adaptive plan and work toward that.
Maybe an elected planning and development commission?
My point regarding the rail yard is that 30 year view. As we look forward, do we really want a railway and a rail yard right in the middle of our city 30 years from now? Right now it's an industrial wasteland, an eyesore, and with those huge fuel distribution tanks, a potential fireball erupting in the sky right adjacent to downtown and residential neighborhoods.
The railway and rail yard has always created a virtual wall within our city, inhibited economic development westward and hugely diminishes inner city property values.
Just look at the Vermont Railway maintenance facility on Park Street... That alone is an eyesore with junk thrown helter skelter and trashed cars... That's a terrible visual introduction to any "out of towners" that come here for anything happening at the fairgrounds, the fair, visiting Vermont Achievement Center or visiting our southwest neighborhood. It projects an attitude of apathy.
-- Posted by steve Nunya on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 8:34 am EST

report this comment



a few random thoughts here..

I would guess things that draw people to the downtown in general.

turning the back alley into a more open park and having things going on, is a good start.

is there a way to create mini-parking in vacant locations- the old stewarts, for example. In other words.. look at all available potential resources and ask- what can we do with this space? That stewarts space is privately owned- but, also.. sitting empty. that serves no one. How many other small spaces are there that could be borrowed/ accessed..? I honestly don't know.. and I will guess most people don't. The pit- granted, now it is going to be developed. But- how much harder would it have been for the city to have leased it, neatened it up a bit.. and let it be free parking for local shoppers.

In general.. the more times a person frequents a location, for any purpose.. the more likely they are to return to that location, even for other things. This is the reason supermarkets put milk at the farthest location from the entrance. it keeps people in the store longer.. forces them through other things which catch their attention en route.

Boston, for example- has musicians playing randomly all over the place.. why not encourage these sorts of instances.. it makes space feel more friendly/ warmer.

mini-parks, like you might find in new york or boston.. with lighting for after hours access that minimizes miscreant activity.. artwork, perhaps themed and/ or rotated.. maybe showcasing what schools/ colleges in the area are doing...

a bike path is another excellent idea- especially if someone ( the city? creative economy?) puts together one of those bike share(?) programs.. where anyone can go into a location.. take out a bike.. and return it in any other location. these services are either free or very inexpensive.. and it encourages use of bikes in central locations.



btw- how much of the space above downtown businesses is vacant?

what incentives are being offered to help new businesses set up shop? rent decreases etc.. setting up shop and overhead expenses are hard on anyone. And if there were ways to support people to start a business WITHOUT the huge debt incurred of borrowing money to do it.. this is another way off doing business that needs to change.. borrowing huge amounts of money to start up.. means you start behind the 8-ball with 2 strikes already, before the door ever opens for business.

Bigger is not always better. quality and innovation are more essential than mass production and mass consumption. and thinking outside the box.. and outside the big-box.. are key:)

play nice
-- Posted by Teri J. Dluznieski on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 8:33 am EST

report this comment



I don't know about anyone else but I don't shop downtown because there's no place to park most of the time.

Of course there's the parking garage, but who's going to pay to park there, walk down to the hardware store, buy an item (hopefully they don't need a large item that they'd have to carry back to their vehicle...) walk back to their car and so on when you can go to any other hardware store and not have that hassle?

If they want a different location I'd say they really have the pick of the litter anywhere in the city. The old shoe store next to McDonald's....sits vacant. The old rental place on Strong's Avenue...sits vacant. Go farther north and the old Video World complex is all but completely vacant.

Instead of letting businesses come in and build a new building (ie: the new Auto Zone store sits right up the street from a perfectly good vacant building) incentives should be given for taking over an existing structure.

There are so many existing alternatives that relocating shouldn't even BE an issue. If it were my business and I wasn't making it downtown...it wouldn't take me long to find a better location to keep my doors open and I wouldn't think twice about moving.
-- Posted by T R on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 8:15 am EST

report this comment



While your at it Smart Thinking, lets blame global warming, the war in the middle east, famine and hurricanes on people on welfare.

Nit wit!
.
-- Posted by NONENONE ONE on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 7:53 am EST

report this comment



Moving the railyard is not going to do anything for the city businesses. If any place will benefit from this, it would be Howe Center more than likely. This post is to remind everybody that the so called "leaders" do not have the answers, and more than likely, nobody else has a magical solution either. I only hope that as a whole, the city doesn't think like they have in the past and be gung-ho behind a project that will (more than likely), be a big white elephant in the city, ie:
Vicon Recovery Plant, Rutland Parking Deck, etc. Remember the way these projects were forced onto the residents and in the end they were not, or are not, doing what they were supposed to be for the city? If the city powers that be are really worried about Rutland City, in these economic times, they would be trying to make it so lucrative for a business to relocate/open, with incentives, that it would be crazy for a business not to come to the city. I do not think it would happen though, because a politician in Rutland City only thinks about now, not the future, unless it is their campaigns. Time has a way of weeding out the bad, and the good for that matter. Good Day,CCF
-- Posted by Clyde Fitzgerald on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 7:40 am EST

report this comment



Yeah Smart Thinking......AH closed because of people on welfare...

You nimrod!
.
-- Posted by NONENONE ONE on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 7:36 am EST

report this comment



Right on about those enterprize zone ideas..I've never heard anybody with similiar suggestions..Just Me you are correct about the supply and demand function of the tenant make-up downtown. A blend of family friendly (we have enough bars), forward looking, tech savy, retail and back office users would be ideal. Give innovative companies a reason to look at Rutland and the mix can only improve. Rutland will support a vibrant downtown, but it is slow going turning this supertanker around.

That Guy is off base, yet somewhat amusing..Louras and Coppinger are at least trying to improve dt, more than some whiny guy from his PC barking out orders to the Herald is doing.
-- Posted by Back Nine on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 11:19 pm EST

report this comment



Aubuchon Hardware closed their store for one simple reason, a 50 percent drop in sales. You can provide all sorts of incentives to try to attract new businesses, but if those businesses are retail stores, they require walk-in customers. If the customers are not coming to your store because they can go elsewhere to buy what they want for a cheaper price or with less parking hassles, your business will ultimately fail. Incentives might delay that failure somewhat, but in the end, if your customer base is not there, you will be forced to go out of business.

In retail sales, the customer is king. Ignore the wants of the customer at your peril because he will simply go elsewhere to shop if alternatives exist. Unfortunately for downtown Rutland City, shopping alternatives do exist. If you want retail business to improve downtown, you are going to have to make downtown businesses more attractive to the customers than similar businesses conveniently located along the RT 4 & 7 corridors. It's either that or locate businesses downtown that sell goods or services that people want and can't be obtained anyplace else in the area.
-- Posted by Just Me on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 10:53 pm EST

report this comment



Rutland City needs to establish an "Enterprise Zone" for the downtown area. Enterprise Zones, when structured correctly, will draw companies from outside of Rutland and help reduce unemployment currently hovering around 10%. Enterprise Zones are not a new idea, but what if we offered real incentives for business to set up shop here? The City could offer:

1) Employment Credit-Businesses can take an annual tax credit up to $2,500 (or whatever number works) for each employee who lives in the Zone (Rutland City)

2) CVPS Power Discount-Offer 30% discount on power rates on 1st year of a 5 year subsidy plan. Slide down discount 5% a year thereafter.

3) Increase Deductions- Let Businesses take an increase in deduction up to $30,000 of the cost of equipment or other related costs in the placed-in-service year.

4) City offers tax waiver of first $500 and freezes tax rate for 5 years. Businesses relocating from outside of the City get low tax rate as an inducement to move to Rutland.

5) Set up a website explaining all the credits available and get all the downtown advocate partership groups under one umbrella. Make is easier to come to Rutland

6) Fix the flooding problem!

We are losing good people and jobs due to the unsustainable burden we place on business in this State. It is time to offer relief to our working friends, let's figure it out before we have to turn the lights off.
-- Posted by Bradford Broyles on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 8:21 pm EST

report this comment



If Vermont would eve get tough with welfare laws, stop handing everything out to those who do nothing to earn it, and stop penalizing the workers of society, we would have less problems. Look at the extremely high percentage of welfare slobs we have in Rutland. If we stop catering to the non-productive welfare parasites of society, and start rewarding productive members of society, maybe businesses in our society would thrive. The only businesses sustained by welfare recipients are beer, cigarette, and illegal drug sales. Look at Forest Park. It is infected with druggies and alcoholics.
-- Posted by Smart Thinking on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 7:18 pm EST

report this comment



Export: I think you make a good point in terms of adapting to the local customer base, which has unfortunately been shrinking over the years.

As for Wal-Mart attracting people into the downtown area; maybe, but they're only there long enough to park, shop at Wal-Mart, and then drive away again.

These big box stores won't help the downtown. Eventually maybe we'll have a good strip in Rutland town. Maybe we'll even get a Barnes & Noble. One thing's for sure: it'll be a long drive from downtown, and an even longer bus ride.

How about a bike path around the city?

I could care less about football, but I think the new program at Castleton is the most exciting thing happening in this area right now.
-- Posted by None None on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 5:43 pm EST

report this comment



Sorry Bruce, but we already have a couple of tattoo shops and a bail bonds place in town. Head shops may not be legal and there are plenty of motels around that serve as flop houses for the transients. I don't think we have a pawn shop though. That might work. I might even venture into town to see what they had for sale since those places usually have some interesting items at good prices.
-- Posted by Just Me on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 4:26 pm EST

report this comment



The Rutland of today and of the future in not the Rutland of old. Times change and in this case, they are unfortunately changing for the worse. Want a successfully business for downtown Rutland with a future? Open a head shop, a tattoo parlor, a pawn shop, a bail-bonds shop or a flop house. Those are the businesses that usually flourish in cities with a growing drug and crime problem. And as an added bonus, those businesses receive no competition for the dreaded Walmart that everyone seems to hate...but continues to shop at.
-- Posted by Bruce Michaels on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 3:59 pm EST

report this comment



People just do the math when you go from over 20,000 in population and now we are down below 16,000 people what does this tell you. People are leaving Rutland.Its going to get worse till we get new leader ship.
-- Posted by Rich C on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 3:50 pm EST

report this comment



It is a shame they went out of business after so many years. This store's location was always a problem as there is no place to park.

It became more of an issue when a home improvement store came in. I don't think Walmart competes as directly with a hardware store than some of the other big name stores. The company stated that this store's business went down about 50% since 2001. I think this is around the time the home improvement store came to Rutland. This has more to do with that store's sales than Walmart.

I believe competintion is a good thing though. Small store's like this have typically had to charge higher prices to stay in business. This store compared to others in the area was high in price.
-- Posted by None None on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 3:13 pm EST

report this comment



Two comments:
#1 - I shop at the mall in Rutland Town because the stores downtown are not open in the evenings. I realize this is sort of a chicken-and-the-egg situation. If people would shop downtown, the stores would stay open in the evenings. If the stores were open in the evenings, people would shop downtown. What's the answer? I don't think there is one.
#2 - How about a shuttle running up and down through downtown all day long. People could park in the WalMart lot and still be able to get to all the downtown stores.
-- Posted by None None on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 3:04 pm EST

report this comment



I also need to disagree with None None. Walmart could possibly be looked at as an anchor for the downtown businesses because it is a given that it will attract a certian amount of customers. Rather than complaining that Walmart is "putting these folks out of business," wouldn't it be more constructive to ask, how can these businesses adapt to take advantage of the customers Walmart brings anyway. Small restraunts, copy centers, bakeries etc. Basically, anything that would require shopping or doing business in a store other than Walmart. Probably mostly specialty items.

Now, I agree that some of these businesses are hurt by the likes of Walmart. However, it would be the same if Walmart was put on Route 7. Rutland needs to stop looking at the negatives of having Walmart downtown, and look at trying to adapt, and take advantage of the positives of having Rutland located nearby, like an increase in customer traffic in the immediate vacinity. The businesses that can do that will succeed.
-- Posted by Local Export on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 2:38 pm EST

report this comment



I have visited a few different types of downtown areas in the country, and seen that some are vibrant, while some are similar to Rutland's. Now, I have no data or studies to back up my opinions, however I have made a few observations as to the differences between the successful and the less successful downtown areas. One thing I notice in successful downtown areas, is that while some customers of downtown businesses are from the exterior or suburbs of the area, the majority of customer base is local for at least a portion of the day. In some cases, it is customers who live in apartments above the storefronts, and in areas directly adjacent to the commercial area. In other cases, the downtown area consists of business offices, not commercial businesses with storefronts, but rather corporate offices, law offices, public services offices etc. The majority of commercial businesses in these downtown areas exist primarily to service these types of customers, not the suburb weekend shoppers. In many cases, downtown areas may supplement this customer base with the suburb group, whether it be with festivals and gatherings, or centers of attraction (like stadiums, theaters, etc.), but the main customer base is still the "locals."

With that being said, if Rutland wants to gain that vibrant downtown area that everyone on this board seems to think is neccessary, they need to increase the local customer base. Many of the empty storefronts could possibly become offices rather than retail space. Areas above the storefronts may need to be utilized differently. Ect.

Like I said, this is just my observation, and I have not researched it to see if studies have been done that would agree or disagree with me. However, rather than complaining that businesses are leaving the downtown area, I think it is important to think about what has changed in the area, what customers exist in the area, how to increase those customers to some extent, and most importantly, what types of businesses will effectively meet the needs of the existing customers and do not need to depend on the suburb crowd. A vibrant downtown will attract more customers, however to gain a vibrant downtown, the current downtown needs to be able to operate with the existing "local" customers.
-- Posted by Local Export on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 2:28 pm EST

report this comment



This is what you get when Wal-Mart comes in..... downtown businesses are bled dry. I'm sure Wal-Mart's downtown location was originally rationalized as a way to "replace" the old K-Mart, but allowing them to move in there was a crucial mistake.

At the end of the night, Wal-Mart presses a button and -- Presto -- all the profits are sent electronically to Bentonville, Arkansas. Rutland gets nothing.
-- Posted by None None on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 1:35 pm EST

report this comment



The parking deck would probably be more useful to downtown shoppers if they were charged by the hour, versus being charged a flat fee for parking there. No matter how long you park there, it's 3 dollars. Why park there when you can poach a spot in Walmart's plaza for 3 hours for free? No wonder shoppers don't use it. It would also help neighboring businesses if the drainage problem associated with the parking deck was fixed, as I'm sure Aubuchon got water in their basement recently. They may have been willing to weather the slowed business in that location if they weren't worrying about leaking walls, flood insurance and lost inventory.
And I wish more people would recognize what a disservice Walmart does for the surrounding community, as Teri pointed out. It amazes me how downtown gets money from Zamias for the supposed diversion of business to the mall, yet they allowed Walmart to move right into downtown and certifiably suck the life out of many downtown businesses, forcing them to close or relocate. Not many companies would be brave (or stupid) enough to move within a mile of that building. And now, look at the mall and how its vacancy issue nearly mirrors that of downtown.
Honestly, who would put a new business downtown, if your basement floods every year, and Walmart steals your customers?
-- Posted by concerned citizen on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 1:23 pm EST

report this comment



BOOM there goes another business to Vermonts crappy business enviornment. this business has been here for generations and thats that. sorry to hear it. also Pepsi in Clarendon is going. 15 - 20 local jobs gone there also. oh and by the way. business employee health insurances priemiums are going up dramaticly also. I guess it means more bad news to follow soon. ( MONTPIELIER PLEASE GET A CLUE AND WAKE THE HELL UP WILL YA )
-- Posted by John Smith on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 12:47 pm EST

report this comment



My family and I rarely shopped at Aubuchon despite being a well stocked little hardware store with a helpful staff. The reason is very simple, parking. This is the same reason why we never shop at any of the other stores in town. It's just a big hassle; parallel parking, paying for parking meters, and parking tickets if we over-stay. Who needs that when there are plenty of shopping alternatives in Rutland Town. If there were no shopping alternatives, we'd be forced to shop in the city and would have to get accustomed to the inconveniences of city shopping. But since there are alternatives, we just shop where it is more convenient. Obviously we are not alone in this thinking, otherwise business would be prospering in Rutland City. They are not. Walmart is the exception. It prospers despite it's location because of attractive prices and it offers convenient parking. You can always find a convenient parking place within 200 ft of the store entrance.

We have become a mobile society dependent upon our cars. Like it or not, the majority of shoppers have become spoiled by the convenience of the strip malls. Parking is usually not a problem there and you don't have to walk a block or more in bad weather to get to the store you want to visit. If Rutland City has any hope of surviving as a viable location for merchants, they will have to make radical changes so they can compete with the convenience of strip malls. If they don't, the city will go the way of so many other small cities around the country. Make no mistake about it, in order to succeed, the changes will have to be radical and expensive and for that reason, they will not be undertaken. The fate of Rutland of the 2000's will be the fate of Bruce Springsteen's Asbury Park of the 1960's. A thriving little city that fell into decay and drug infestation due to the arrival of suburban shopping centers. The city was unwilling to knock down several buildings to provide open air parking so shoppers would have convenient access to the stores and the city ultimately collapsed into decay as one by one, merchants moved out of the city. Convenient, open-air parking is the key. Experience has shown that suburban and small-city people dislike enclosed, multi-level parking garages due to real or imagined security concerns. Yes, open-air single-level parking is an inefficient use of land space but you have to give the people what they will feel comfortable with, otherwise, they will just shop elsewhere.
-- Posted by Just Me on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 11:19 am EST

report this comment



I don't live in Rutland, and I haven't followed the status for the number of years that most people who grew up here.

But I suspect that the downturn of the downtown, is not solely the fault of the partnership, the board or elected/ appointed officials. Walmart makes a huge dent in any local landscape wherever they set up shop.

The bottom line is, there is generally a finite number of dollars in any society. The question becomes- where do they get spent? Add a national economic melt-down into the equation where there are just that many less-dollars... and those who were on the border of being viable.. no longer are. Stores like Walmart- which have the 5th largest economy in the WORLD ( yes.. their financial resources are far greater than 95% of the countries on the planet. roughly).. and they can ride out the rough times.. passing our/ your " savings" down the economic food chain.. by exploiting slave-wage workers in other countries.. and, knowing that they are looking at the longer haul.. where they will emerge from a slump with even less local competition...

I don't know what the solution is- but the economic scenario is a much more complex one than the one of generations past... so take all things into consideration before screaming about whose fault it is...

be well. play nice.
-- Posted by Teri J. Dluznieski on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 9:01 am EST

report this comment



that guy,
I'm curious... Just what do you think a mayor can do to compensate any business for a 50% drop in sales?
This is business and business is all about the bottom line profit. In a modern business environment that bottom line is determined by sales volume of a large variety of products. Stores like Aubuschon fail due to lack of variety and an inability to maintain enough sales volume to compete with mega-stores like Home Depot, Tractor Supply or Walmart that make a few cents profit on thousands of items, not dollars of profit on a few items.
The buying public themselves created this scenario by demanding more variety and lower prices and tolerating lower quality products imported from Southeast Asia.
No mayor is responsible, the market is responsible. People's wallets and their changing values are responsible.
That said, there are some areas within Rutland City that should receive some developmental infrastructure improvements to provide incentive to some of the larger volume stores that are locating in Rutland Town and Clarendon to locate in the city.
The current rail yard is a prime example. Once the rail yard is relocated (if ever), that would open up a huge tract of land that could be developed and provide enough building space for stores like Aubuschon to attain the sales volume they need to stay viable. I know many people believe spending 100 million to relocate the rail yard is a lot of money but when you consider the potential income to the city from both the increased property taxes, city resident employment, increased sales of water and sewer with the area, as well as all the other residual effects, it's a no-brainer.
That whole section of Strongs Ave., formerly Mintzer Brothers, now an eyesore, is another huge oportunity for the city waiting to be realized.
Finally, that incredibly under utilized space within the city that is now the fair grounds is a huge example of potential financial windfall to the city.
If we as a city are going to survive we need to be proactive in competing with the business environments of Rutland Town and Clarendon. This attitude by our "civic leaders" of looking confused and wringing their hands while our city businesses dry up and blow away is not going to sustain us. If we don't start getting AGRESSIVE in this increasingly competitive battle for economic viability, we just wont be economically viable at all.
-- Posted by steve Nunya on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 8:01 am EST

report this comment



Another bite out of downtown business. I am speechless. In this economy I would think tax incentives or any incentives would be used to entice businesses to come downtown. I will miss this store, you could find most anything there. One less reason to go downtown. Mayor Louras has a downtown business so why isn't he getting aggressive about this. I mean very aggressive about this. I miss Mayor Godnick.
-- Posted by Concerned Citizen on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 8:01 am EST

report this comment



The closing may have been sudden to shoppers but I suspect that Aubuchon's corp. office has known about if for a few days. So sorry that they didn't call you and give you a heads up.

It is unfortunate that they are leaving the down town because they were the last hardware store in the downtown area. They always seemed to do their best to attract and serve their customers with their hours and friendly service. Certainly more than some other businesses, but I can see their point. A business is in business to do what? To make money for the investors. That is the bottom line. If the volume of sales didn't pay the bills and leave enough for a respectable return on investment what choice do you have. After all you are not the government that can run at a deficit and fill in with tax dollars.

The ideal location for any retail business would be along the Rte 7/4 corridor between the Holiday Inn and CVS. There aren't a lot of vacant businesses or lot along that route right now. Maybe the old Rutland House store, the old Hanaford store

It would really be nice if the folks who have such disdain for the mayor and the partnership would share some of their great weatlh of experience and skills to help fix the problems instead of sniping all the time. Rutland really needs as many suggestions as they can get.
-- Posted by northstar62 on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 7:57 am EST

report this comment



Remember when Rutland City had burgeoning sidewalk sales and no Downtown Partnership to bring in outside vendors. Remember when Rutland City had an Ethnic Festival that didn't need to be merged into a lessened sidewalk sales event. Remember when Rutland City had Fishmans, Woolworths, shoe stores, Carbine Anderson, Wilson Sports. While now a Partership survey says there is too many retail outlets downtown; well were down another one. Remember when downtown streets had real lighting not cosmetic fish bowls that make for a darkened central hub. Remember when Edson Street had businesses, not a poorly designed Fleecing of America Transit Center that fills basements with water when it rains. Let's spend a million dollars to renovate the Center Street Alleyway, 14 million to build a "spec" building in The Pit; continue to strap the downtown building owners with additional property tax assessments to fund the people who did the above to downtown. Remember when the Rutland Herald printed it's newspaper downtown.
Remember when strong mayors such as Nichols or Godnick would have stood up to the plate and lobbied for downtown; rather than the Partnership saying pool our money to pay for a Washington lobbyist. Remember when Rutland Town had few businesses and was not the core shopping location. Who are they partners with..The Town of Rutland. My son had his first job at Aubuchons and was proud of working there; in the downtown. Rutland Economic Development wants to clean up Flory Plaza in the Town as it is unsightly for people coming from the west on Business 4. Wonder how those same people feel about seeing all the vacant stores downtown that also is somewhat unsightly. Perhaps Economic Development feels that Center Rutland is a better investment
over the long term. Remember when Rutland City celebrated it's downtown merchants by recognizing them for long term committment, rather than hitting them with long term assessments. Aubuchons will be missed. It was notable that despite working with City Hall that Aubuchons could not find an adequate location downtown. Perhaps the renovated Flory Plaza will be there new home someday. Some of us remember how it was, and believe it still could be.
-- Posted by Ed Larson on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 7:19 am EST

report this comment



Well, I was wrong... after the first version of this article, I wrote that I thought we'd just get the standard-issue "Golly gee, I had no idea this was coming" quote from Mike Coppinger from the Downtown Rutland Partnership and Death Watch (DRPDW); instead, we get a different kind of standard-issue quote -- this from Mayor Christopher "I Owns This Town" Louras, telling us how Very Hard He's Been Working For Us (and failing, as per usual).

A suggestion for the Rutland Herald: set up a "Store Closing" article template for use over the next three to four years. It'll save you time and money.

Oh, heck... I'll do it for you!

[Long-time downtown Rutland institution] suddenly closed its doors yesterday. Calls were not returned from [Long-time downtown Rutland institution]'s employees. [Long-time downtown Rutland institution] just celebrated its [30th/40th/50th/60th] anniversary last year.

When asked for the reasons behind the sudden closing, [store's regional manager] said [it's all about the sales / it's all about the location / wait, we still have a store in RUTLAND?] and refused further comment.

A call to the building's owner, [Mark Foley Sr. / uh... let's face it, that's about all there is] was not returned, as Mr. Foley is busy with his years-long downtown rental master plan: Part 1: Price everyone out of the market; Part 2: Use the wave of empty storefronts to hang cheap paper ads for The Party Store; Part 3: To Be Determined, Eventually.

When asked about the store's closing, Downtown Rutland Partnership and Death Watch Director Mike Coppinger said ["What store?" / "When did THIS happen?" / I haven't had time to work much due to personal commitments" / Excuse me, I have to go plant flowers in a median"].

Meanwhile, Rutland Mayor and Burgermeister Meisterburger Christopher Louras insisted that [he'd personally threatened bodily harm to the store's owners if they left / he'd personally go up to Montpelier to straighten out those anti-Rutland types who caused this / it's all Rutland Town's fault].
-- Posted by That Guy on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 7:14 am EST

report this comment



The Rutland Craphole gets bigger! It really says alot about rutland when a business thats been there for over 50 yrs shuts its doors!
-- Posted by True Vermonter on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 6:41 am EST

report this comment



good grief, charlie brown, what next? I used to go in their basement, and bought
good deals on wall paper? many many moons ago, tho. sad to see Rutland
going down fast.
-- Posted by MO on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, 3:24 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout