RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Ira wind supporters begin to stir publicly



Toolbox

By Gordon Dritschilo Staff Writer - Published: September 3, 2009

A group of Ira residents say it may not be quite so clear which way the wind is blowing.

Opposition has thus far dominated public discussion of a proposed 80-megawatt wind farm, most or all of which would be in Ira. However, a group calling itself Friends of Ira Wind has informally organized, saying the proposal has backers in town as well as detractors.

"I really think there are a lot more supporters who aren't willing to come out and be as vocal as I am," said Ted Sheloski, who organized a meeting of supporters of the plan last week. "Just walking and talking to people … I find nothing but support."

Shortly after they learned of Vermont Community Wind Farm's plans in March, opponents of the plan began organizing and discussing how to stop it. They listed concerns including the destruction of local views and potential environmental and health effects.

At public meetings in Ira, the apparent sentiment toward the plan has been overwhelmingly negative, with almost no one speaking in favor of it.

Sheloski said about a dozen people attended his meeting last week. He said he plans to hold another in early October and to organize committees to take on various tasks promoting the project.

"We're a group that believes strongly in wind power for all the right reasons —environmental reasons, economic reasons, the whole nine yards," he said. "I've personally seen a wind farm. I have 39 towers behind a camp of mine in Maine."

Sheloski said he does not own any land involved in the project and that he does not work for VCWF.

"There's a rumor out there that I'm getting paid by Vermont Community Wind," he said. "I got a hat and a T-shirt, that's it. … I'm doing this strictly privately, on my own, because I believe in what they're doing."

Sheloski said he was inspired by looking at his 11-month-old grandson and thinking about how the world has changed in the past 30 years, going from affordable gas and electricity to an explosion in energy prices.

"It's time for our generation to fix this for future generations," he said.

Sue Johnson, an Ira resident who attended the meeting, said she also supports wind power out of concern for her grandchildren.

"We need to do something, so why not Ira?" she asked.

Like Sheloski, Johnson said she thinks there are many people in Ira who support the project, but have not spoken out publicly. She thinks the two sides can common ground once people on both sides get their facts straight.

"We need more information," she said. "In the long run, we need to come together."

Ron Johnston, another supporter of the project, said he missed the meeting because he was out of town. He said that three or four of the potential sites are right in front of his house and that he has seen towers in upstate New York and spoken to people who live near them.

"My wife and I, we don't mind the look of them," he said. "I think they're a good, clean way of making energy."

Johnston also said he liked the potential financial benefits of the project, which could include payments to the town in excess of the total municipal budget.

"We could do a lot with that money, pay for new buildings and lower taxes," he said.

Select Board Chairwoman Christina Tyminski said the board has heard from some people who support the project, but her impression is that more opponents have contacted the town than supporters.

Sheloski said rhetoric about how divisive the project is has been misplaced.

"It's not pitting neighbor against neighbor," he said. "It's like me being a Democrat and you being a Republican. We're still going to be friends. We're still going to talk."

gordon.dritschilo@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


I am an Ira resident and I did not know about this recent meeting. The first meeting was preceded by a sign on the old Town Hall lawn. This time there was no sign advertising any meeting. Could there be a connection as to whom is wanted at meetings? I hope that there will be notice(s) for any future meetings. Good Day, CCF
-- Posted by Clyde Fitzgerald on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 8:01 pm EST

report this comment



1. The reporter did not attend the meeting

Fact I was there. You and the reporter were not.

2. The reporter did not mention that the project developer, Per White-Hansen and his public relations person Jeff Wennberg were at the meeting and spoke for more than 3/4s of the 2 hour meeting. It was more their meeting than a meeting of Ira residents

Fact it was to inform those who came and there was more then enough time to ask Any question. All questions were answered and there was follow-up so nobody was left hanging or without an answer to a qestion.

3. The reporter identified the "group" of about 14 people as Ira residents, though only three Ira wind supporters were in attendance.

Fact It was an open meeting anybody could attended. If the anti wind supports are bent they should have been there.

4. Half of the people who attended the meeting at the town hall were wind opponents.

Fact There was no poll taken as to who stood on which side before during or after. Were did he come up with this "poll" (sloppy work) in my view to say that He "knew" who stood where. I did not know every ones position and I was one of the last to leave.

5. The rest of the supporters were two people from West Rutland and two people from Castleton.
This is hardly an organically grown support group. It is one person being used by the project developers to try and show potential investors that not everyone is opposed to this project, and the Rutland Herald reporter is for some reason willing to color the story to suit the developer. The public deserves better.


Fact Again anybody could come even from West Rutlandd, Castleton or Mars! it matters not because only the Ira Towns people can vote on the issue.

Now the facts are set straight. NoneNone I was not being hard on your points, it is that you have been given false facts. If you support the project great if not great that is your choice as it mine but the Facts have been corrected.

Next time show up and you'll be better informed
that is why I went.
-- Posted by M Mobae on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 3:51 pm EST

report this comment



You can confirm the facts by contacting the reporter and asking him if he was there and ask him if he confirmed that all the people present were wind supporters and where they were from. You can further confirm the facts by contacting Jeff Wennberg, the public relations person for Vermont Community Wind, and asking him who was in attendance, where they were from, and how many wind opponents were there, and how much the people in the room said compared to what he and the developer said. Ira is a small town, a friendly community, we talk to our neighbors, we know what's going on. The newspaper's inaccurate reporting does not make us like the wind project any better; it makes it worse because it seems like the reporter has taken sides.
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 8:57 am EST

report this comment



None None

How do I know if your facts about this meeting are correct?
-- Posted by M Mobae on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 1:04 pm EST

report this comment



Another piece of selective reporting by the Rutland Herald.
1. The reporter did not attend the meeting
2. The reporter did not mention that the project developer, Per White-Hansen and his public relations person Jeff Wennberg were at the meeting and spoke for more than 3/4s of the 2 hour meeting. It was more their meeting than a meeting of Ira residents
3. The reporter identified the "group" of about 14 people as Ira residents, though only three Ira wind supporters were in attendance.
4. Half of the people who attended the meeting at the town hall were wind opponents.
5. The rest of the supporters were two people from West Rutland and two people from Castleton.
This is hardly an organically grown support group. It is one person being used by the project developers to try and show potential investors that not everyone is opposed to this project, and the Rutland Herald reporter is for some reason willing to color the story to suit the developer. The public deserves better.
-- Posted by None None on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 8:51 am EST

report this comment



voting is a great way to hear the voices of the people. The only caveat to that is that too many people are voting from a foundation of information based on hyperbole, fear and disinformation. Step one is to really get solid data out there in such a way that it reaches the people.. and reaches beyond the ears and gets processed. This way, pro or con.. at least they are voting with clear and level heads.

There has been WAY too much fear-mongering out there for the majority to vote rationally.

Play nice.
-- Posted by Teri J. Dluznieski on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 8:50 am EST

report this comment



The town could always put the issue up for vote by ballot (rather than public meeting) to let people communicate support or opposition. I always thought this was the real answer to Act 250 appeals--let the people of the community decide.
-- Posted by Wendy Wilton on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 7:39 am EST

report this comment



I'm happy to see the supporters of this project speak out.

Wind is not the end all but any source that will add power to the grid will be of help.

The wind is going to blow with or without this project so why not good use of it.

There will be those that will say "Not In My Backyard" but somebody has to give.

My understanding is that PSB has set such high standards for any wind project in the state that
and that those standards are in effect for the length of the contract 25 years.

I will not even go into the economic value to the tax payers of Ira.

It's a win-win, some green power and lower taxes!

Sign me up!
-- Posted by M Mobae on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, 6:33 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout