RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

RRA pitches municipal telecom network



Toolbox

By STEPHANIE M. PETERS STAFF WRITER - Published: September 4, 2009

It's been about 15 months since the Rutland Redevelopment Authority's Tom Macaulay last publicly floated his plan to construct a fiber-optic municipal telecommunications network between Middlebury and Pittsfield, a project that largely stalled in the interim because of the economy.

In the meantime, the extra time has allowed the RRA to hone its business plan for Rutland Telecom and contract with a consultant, Tim Nulty, responsible for setting up both Burlington Telecom and EC Fiber, a similar project between White River Junction and Montpelier that just had its groundbreaking this week.

On Thursday evening, Macaulay was back before representatives from nine of the 14 communities in Rutland, Addison and Bennington counties invited to participate to present the revised proposal – the highlight of which is that being wired into the high-tech service won't require a financial buy in the municipalities.

"What we're proposing to do is create a limited liability corporation that is wholly owned by the RRA," Macaulay explained in an interview Thursday afternoon. "That LLC itself can apply for federal dollars, which is what allows the towns to be protected from financial risk."

As Macaulay explained in answer to one question Thursday, it's possible for the RRA – itself technically a separate municipality from the city – to own and operate an LLC. It hasn't been formed yet because once done, an LLC only has 90 days to begin doing business, Macaulay said.

Meanwhile, Nulty said $55 million in funding (which also accounts for debt service until the target date for the company's profitability) would likely come from nonrecourse project financing made possible by the 2008 Farm Bill.

He said he's confident Rutland Telecom shouldn't have trouble being granted the funds; similarly, EC Fiber just submitted an application for stimulus fund and the construction company on the project is so confident the money will be granted it began mapping telephone polls on spec this week in Tunbridge.

According to Macaulay, the only thing the invited municipalities – which include Poultney, Fair Haven, Castleton, West Rutland, Rutland Town, Rutland City, Proctor, Pittsford, Brandon, Middlebury, Mendon, Killington and Pittsfield and Dorset – need to do is sign a letter of intent and pick a town resident to serve on Rutland Telecom's board of advisers.

In return, towns would receive payments in lieu of taxes, or PILOT, and revenue sharing based on a town's volume of participation when the company becomes profitable – something that Nulty estimated would happen at the end of the fourth year in business. Participating towns can also expect that every residence will be connected "without excuses," product packages – including cable television, Internet and phone service – cheaper or on par with private competitors like Comcast and "superior service."

The RRA hopes to know soon what the communities' interest is in participating; Macaulay, Nulty and possibly representatives from towns involved in EC Fiber are willing to speak to select boards, but the RRA is hoping to receive letters of intent by the end of September or early October.

The project is also expected to create 45 to 50 new, permanent jobs and be operated out of the city in a facility separate from the RRA.

stephanie.peters@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


Given that Wendy Wilton has, elsewhere on this website, publicly stated that the ONLY two potential municipal economic-improval projects on the docket for the entire Rutland region are a.) the years-old, pie-in-the-sky railyard relocation project and b.) this "every-failing-community's Savior" fiber-optic telecom project, it seems that the answer to your question about whether or not it will really "work" can best be expressed as follows:

"Who cares? We got nothing else going on and can't seem to come up with any other fresh and/or relevant ideas, so... build, baby, build!"
-- Posted by That Guy on Mon, Sep 14, 2009, 2:22 pm EST

report this comment



Has anyone tried a 'back-of-the-envelope' calculation, to see if this makes economic sense? Most "Muni Fiber Overbuilds" -- there have been dozens in the U.S. and Canada -- fail because they guess they will get 40% or 50% penetration and they typically max out at about 15%. A second huge problem is that the cable industry forces a small municipal competitor to overpay so much for video that it can't compete with Comcast. Then large data users decline to leave global carriers. All one is left with, often, is a core 15% of dedicated 'true believer' consumers who are often wonderful human beings, civic-minded, informed, and concerned, but there are usually too few of them. Rutland is a civic-minded place, and perhaps the model works here, and as an employee of VTel I hope to be forgiven for asking "Can it really work"?
-- Posted by Michel Guite on Fri, Sep 4, 2009, 4:44 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout