RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Firm brings track record to wind project



Toolbox

By Gordon Dritschilo STAFF WRITER - Published: October 18, 2009

Enel North America rang few bells in local energy circles last month when the firm announced its involvement in a proposed wind project in Ira.

"We're a solid company," Enel spokesman Hank Sennott said. "We're a company that's been around for a very long time. We don't build and sell. If we're involved in a project, we're in for the long haul. That's important for communities to know."

It's something Ira seems to want to know. Concerns that developer Per White-Hansen, who retains sole ownership of the project, might sell it off to another company have come up repeatedly at meetings about the proposal.

Sennott said Enel will also provide capital and technical expertise to the Ira project.

So, who are they?

"I would say they fall into the category of an international company looking to get into the American market, looking for partners, trying to make sure their partners are the right partners," said Kathy Belyeu, manager of industry information at the American Wind Energy Association in Washington D.C.

Enel's parent company, Enel SpA, is Italy's largest utility and the second-largest in Europe in terms of installed capacity.

Belyeu said Enel just debuted at number 20 on its list of the top 20 wind owners in the United States. Enel had 250 megawatts installed at the time of the count, late last year, though Enel's Web site now claims almost 400 megawatts of installed wind capacity in the U.S. and another 27 in Canada.

The company in the top spot, Next Era Energy, had 6,000 megawatts.

"There's a large drop-off as you go down the list," she said. "Next Era owns about one-quarter of the U.S. market."

Belyeu said this was not the best time to get into the energy market in the U.S. because the financial crisis has made it difficult to get projects financed.

"Last year was a very big year in the U.S.," she said. "This year has been smaller. … The stimulus bill is definitely helping, but in general it's not the time to build large infrastructure projects."

Last year also saw a trend of European energy companies buying up U.S. producers, Belyeu said.

"That's because the dollar was relatively weak and those were inexpensive assets to the Europeans," she said. "That's no longer so much the case."

The U.S. was the largest market for new wind projects last year, and Belyeu said that while China will probably claim that mantle this year, the U.S. remains attractive to foreign investors in wind. She said half of the top 20 project developers were affiliated with international corporations.

"It's a global market," she said. "American companies are involved internationally as well."

Sennott said the company's commitment to wind has increased, but is far from exclusive.

"We're interested in all the technologies, from geothermal to hydro," he said. "Wind is certainly high on the list. Our goal is a diverse portfolio."

Sennott refused to say how much the company would invest or discuss other details of Enel's contract with Vermont Community Wind Farm. He would say that VCWF's effort is the only Vermont wind project in which they are involved.

"We'd be interested if something became available," he said. "At this point there is any formal search (for other Vermont projects) that I'm aware of. … I think we were attracted to Vermont because of the reputation it has of being interested in renewable energy, being a green state."

They own four hydroelectric plants in Vermont. The company's nearest wind farm to Vermont is in Fenner, N.Y.

"Right from the time the project started, they've been great," said Fenner town supervisor Russell Cary, who was on the town council when development there started in 1998 and has held his current position since 2000. "They've been great neighbors. They're still great neighbors."

Cary said Fenner was the first wind farm in the eastern United States and, having little precedent to go by, the town repeatedly had to go back to the company to change construction specifications to which they had agreed. He said the company always cooperated.

When local subcontractors disregarded requirements about what roads they were to use, Cary said a single phone call brought someone from the corporate headquarters who cracked a whip and got the contractors to fall into line.

"When the project started there was a lot of skepticism," he said. "This was the biggest project to go in this county in a single year. The size was mind-boggling. … The scary part was the unknown and I think they settled a lot of that."

Al Joe Wallace, a county commissioner in Lincoln County, Kansas, where Enel recently built two wind farms totaling more than 200 megawatts, said the development there was uncontroversial.

"We've had very few problems," he said. "Most of them were just a communication problem once in a while. … The developer had a good groundwork and a good working relationship with government officials here. We knew who to call and they got back to us with any problems."

With opposition to the Ira project dominating most of the public discussion so far, Sennott said the company can contribute its expertise in reaching out to local communities.

"It's understandable people would have questions and concerns," he said. "We've been through the process. We've dealt with concerned citizens. … We can bring to the table some experience and hopefully some credibility as a good, reliable, energy company."

Sennott said a large part of Enel's mission will be "educating the public."

"We have to answer people's questions for as long as it takes and as best we can," he said. "It's important to involve the community in as many ways as we can. Enel wants to be a good neighbor."

gordon.dritschilo@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


For a state who say they are green why do we keep cutting off things that would be better for our air ? as they say not in my back yard ,
-- Posted by kitty robinson on Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 9:04 am EST

report this comment



Bottom line: Vermonters like to talk about feel-good ideas like renewable energy, but when it comes time to "walk the talk," they are suddenly brought back to the real world.

Maybe Vermonters should stop living in a land of make-believe? Don't proudly crow about how "Vermont was green before being green was cool" like the bumper sticker says. There's nothing green about VT except the trees -- our energy needs are the same as anyone else's in a similar climate.

Saying "no" to everything from wind power to nuclear is hypocritical. The power you use has to come from somewhere.
..
-- Posted by mark on Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 6:58 am EST

report this comment



"Public education" is not important at this point. The PSB will decide this case based on the law and the evidence presented by the developer and any interested parties or intervenors. If the wind industry was straight with the public, it would use proper noise prediction models, and acknowledge that virtually every wind project built within a mile of homes anywhere in the world has resulted in complaints about noise, and health issues beginning with sleep disturbance in small portion of the population. But it does not, because that would mean too many easy to develop sites would be off limits.

If the Rutland Herald was straight with its readers, it would point out that the reason that wind projects are having trouble getting funded, and need the stimulus funds (courtesy of our children and grandchildren) to bail them out before they even put shovel in the ground, is that wind generated electricity is about 3 times more expensive than the "regular kind" that supplies 99% of the electricity we use. In Vermont the "regular kind" is mostly Hydro Quebec and VT Yankee, with a number of small scale hydro projects like the one just north of Rutland City on RT 7. The controlling factor is the price of natural gas, which is at a ten year low. Huge reserves of domestic gas have recently been discovered which will only keep downward pressure on the price for the foreseeable future. Wind power is not needed and should be resisted at every opporunity, beginning with repealing the RGGI initiative that calls for ever increasing new renewable generation, but does not count Hydro Quebec as renewable. The Lowell wind project will only offset Hydro Quebec's output, not reduce fossil fuel consumption. That is not the way to combat climage change folks.
-- Posted by Stephen Thurston on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 10:13 pm EST

report this comment



It is sad that the state is being overrun by these speculators, proposing huge industrial turbine farms in the name of "renewable" energy.

These installations are a scam. They benefit only the develops and destroy hundreds of acres of habitat on the mountain tops. The saddest part is that they contribute NOTHING to the energy mix. It is impossible to get the scam artists to document what *actually* goes into the grid.

Start with efficiency statistics below 30% and then add in the fact that most times the turbines are actually producing, the energy doesn't even make it to the grid.

Just. Sad.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 6:44 pm EST

report this comment



Malcolm,
I don't want to confuse you with facts so I'll put this argument in terms you might understand:
Would you buy, even with gov't money, a cow that gives milk less than two days a week on average, but no one which days or how much milk?
No.
Then why should we the taxpayers, ratepayers and exploited residents have to buy into industrial wind projects that are less efficient than the cow but far more expensive.
-- Posted by rob pforzheimer on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 6:11 pm EST

report this comment



The people of Ira, don't care about Enel. We were curious about who was financing the project. So now we know who is applying for the "stimulus" money. Big deal. I am more concerned with what is getting ready to happen to my town and how to stop it them. That is the only reason I care who Enel is. This is just another example of the Rutland Herald helping to shift the thinking of the people of Rutland. Who will take the time to read this article, but not the time to look any deeper into the subject of industrial wind. We're all getting "duped" by the developers. Hey Malcom, I aint no left winger. I just don't like technology that doesn't work. If you can't shut down conventional power plants and have to destroy the town where the wind turbines go up then they are not ecologically sound. The people who love it so much have a financial stake in it or don't live in a town where industrial wind has been installed (Easy for them to say on both counts.) Oh yeah, and don't we all have to pay for it??!! IE: Enel just took, what...64.5 million of government money to do a geothermal project in Nevada. Big wind stinks on every front!
-- Posted by Local Yokel on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 5:28 pm EST

report this comment



If you think foreign companies putting big wind turbines on Vermont mountain tops is "ecologically sound" you haven't done your homework. Read up on the costs, risks and benefits. The community where the turbines are put bear all the costs and risks, the corporations take the benefits (and money) out of Vermont. It's big business, as usual. Until we take the greed out of wind power development, it will continue to fail in Vermont.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 3:45 pm EST

report this comment



If you think foreign companies putting big wind turbines on Vermont mountain tops is "ecologically sound" you haven't done your homework. Read up on the costs, risks and benefits. The community where the turbines are put bear all the costs and risks, the corporations take the benefits (and money) out of Vermont. It's big business, as usual. Until we take the greed out of wind power development, it will continue to fail in Vermont.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 2:48 pm EST

report this comment



Vermonters are the biggest bunch of hypocritcal, left wingers in the world. They put up barriers to buisness in the name of ecology and then when someone proposes an ecologicaly sound way to produce their power they scream foul. I give up trying to understand these people.
-- Posted by Malcolm Jensen on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 2:17 pm EST

report this comment



Maybe they are afraid some pervert would get horny?
-- Posted by CF Reality on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 1:45 pm EST

report this comment



What is the problem with the word e-r-e-c-t?
Maybe the Rutland Herald should publish their list of banned words.
-- Posted by rob pforzheimer on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 10:52 am EST

report this comment



I can't believe that the word ***** in my previous post was changed to *****.
The original article is terrible "reporting" but censorship like this is ridiculous
-- Posted by rob pforzheimer on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 10:49 am EST

report this comment



"educating the public", involving the public, being a good neighbor.
Unbelievable nonsense quotes like this are right out of the wind developer playbook and are commonly heard in areas about to be exploited. The only interests these poeple have in our communities is strictly financial. They couldn't care less about Ira, Sheffield, Georgia, Lowell, Searsburg, or anywhere else in VT.
Good neighbors don't ***** 430 foot loud strob lit machines and ruin the enjoyment of their neighbors property.
-- Posted by rob pforzheimer on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 10:15 am EST

report this comment



Did the Enel's pr person write this 'article'. If you call yourself a reporter and pen this garbage, look for another job. And what kind of story will you write when the 400 ft wind turbines loom over the ridgeline.
-- Posted by No More on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 10:13 am EST

report this comment



Track Record. Partner with an arrogant speculator:
1) whose "experts" trespass on private property
2) whose "experts" put monitoring equipment on people's private property without permission
3) who tells regulators he has obtained leases for access to a tower site, when those leases did not exist
4) who filed a specific location with regulators for a wind monitoring tower, only to put the tower more than 250 feet away, which involved felling trees onto a stone fireplace historically used by the public, destroying the public's use of the peak of the mountain.
Good neighbors? No amount of education is going to undo the damage this arrogant speculator has done to the community's relationship to wind energy. Enel will learn very quickly that Vermont is not Kansas.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 9:21 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout