RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Ferry to replace bridge for now



The Champlain Bridge, which crosses Lake Champlain, is seen blocked off in Addison on Tuesday.

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Toolbox

By Gordon Dritschilo Staff Writer - Published: October 22, 2009

MIDDLEBURY - There likely won't be a temporary bridge across Lake Champlain, but a temporary ferry service is scheduled to launch Monday.

The Champlain Bridge, which stretches from Addison to Crown Point, N.Y., closed Friday due to safety concerns. The Addison County Chamber of Commerce held a meeting on the situation Wednesday, where several business owners described being cut off from employees and customers.

"We have, right now, 100 acres of corn still standing in New York - 45 acres of soybeans," Addison farmer Robert Smith said. "It needs to be harvested right now."

The nearby ferry cannot handle heavy trucks and Smith said he cannot afford to have his produce trucked around the lake via Whitehall and Fair Haven.

About 90 people attended the meeting at the American Legion, and several told stories of employees who, faced with the choice of a 100-mile detour or a costly ferry ride with a long wait, felt they could no longer afford their jobs.

Porter Hospital spokesman Ron Hallman said the hospital has not just employees, but patients on the other side of the lake. He described one employee getting in line at the ferry at 4:30 a.m.

"Some of these people have to get kids to school," he said. "This is not just a monetary issue. This is a logistical nightmare."

Business owners near the bridge described a catastrophic loss of customers.

"We won't be around for another month," said Lorraine Franklin, owner of the West Addison General Store. "We cannot wait."

Vermont Agency of Transportation spokesman John Zicconi said they would not have to wait long. He said the department had people looking at possible spots for a temporary ferry and expected to have an idea of what was feasible in the next few days.

What the state isn't likely to do, he said, is put in a temporary bridge. He said the lake is an international waterway and such a bridge would block it, something the federal government is unlikely to approve. He also said there were safety concerns with such bridges on the lake.

While the existing ferries can't handle heavy trucks, a temporary one could. Dock Doctors owner Jeff Provost, who said most of his business is in New York, said car ferries regularly used on the Hudson River can handle large trucks, as can available temporary docks.

"They did it with Katrina, they did it with 9/11," he said. "That's what they do. The ability is there."

Brian Goodyear, director of engineering and technical services at the Basin Harbor Club in Vergennes, said the resort would start operating a pedestrian ferry Monday.

Goodyear said the resort, which just closed for the season, has a 48-person capacity boat that will run from Westport, N.Y., to the club. The company is prepared to run the ferry until mid-December, he said, but hopes to shut down in two or three weeks in favor of whatever the state puts in place.

"We are not in the ferry business," he said.

The resort is still working out ground transportation details in Vermont, he said, and is putting information on its Web site, basinharbor.com.

A staffer for Sen. Patrick Leahy said Vermont's congressional delegation was watching the situation closely, as was the New York delegation.

Sen. Peter Shumlin, D-Windham County, said the state owed the people at the meeting an apology and promised prompt action.

"This is nothing short of an outrage," he said. "We all dropped the ball and we're sorry."

gordon.dritschilo@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


Do you all realize that this wasn't an overnight problem? The bridge has been in disrepair for 15 years. No one wanted to be the bad guy who actually closed it to make needed repairs and long term maintenance, so now everyone has to deal with the issue for a long time. It won't be fixed overnight, and between environmental concerns and international waters issues, its going to be a long discussion period.

So, buckle up your overcoats, its going to be a long storm.
-- Posted by Colleen Wright on Thu, Oct 22, 2009, 8:49 pm EST

report this comment



Does anyone in the State of NY or VT DOT understand the meaning of the word MAINTENANCE? If they did, we wouldn't be here.
-- Posted by Ken Napiorkowski on Thu, Oct 22, 2009, 7:23 pm EST

report this comment



I agree with B. Meyer. Again, simple economics. If you don't have ways and means for transportation everything comes to a standstill. I am so sick and tired of all the "who can marry who," CRAP! Transportation is essential! Bridges are essential! Maintaining roads is ESSENTIAL!

It's obvious someone (VT Dept. of Transportation) and (NY Dept. of Transportation) wasn't listening to the structural engineers a while back. I hold both of these departments responsible! State of Vermont continues to waste money on absolutely stupid things. I'm sooo glad my wife bitched to have a garden this year at least we have no shortage of tomato sauce in our house...

Here's my question, so let's say they bring up a ferry or two, are they going to charge us for it? If so, I think that's a crock! Why should we have to pay for a ferry because the State of NY and State of VT, screwed up? I want a ferry from Bridport to Port Henry. I don't want to have to drive up to Vergenes!
-- Posted by Sam Hubert on Thu, Oct 22, 2009, 1:57 pm EST

report this comment



A modified form of car-pooling could work temporarily. We did this several years ago when a rural bridge went out in our state. Here's how it worked. Two or more people could ban together to form a car pool. One of the pool members could leave their car parked on the work-side of the bridge all the time. One of the other poolers would use their car in the morning to pick up the pool members. They would use that car to drive to the bridge. They'd park that car and walk or bicycle across the bridge to the waiting car on the work-side of the bridge. The state installed bike racks where bicycles could be locked up overnight. They also had a temporary moveable pedestrian bridge section they used on the bridge so people could get across the area that bridge workers were working on. That temporary bridge section was cantilevered along the outer edge of the main bridge section and was quite sturdy. As repairs progressed, that moveable pedestrian section was moved. Once on the other side of the bridge, the poolers would get into the car they had permanently stationed on the other side of the bridge and the owner of that car would drop off the other pool members to their places of business. At the end of the work day, the driver would pick everyone up, return to the bridge, and park the car for the night. Then the poolers would cross the bridge on foot (or bicycles), get in the car they parked on the home-side of the bridge and get everyone home using that car. This worked fine for several months once people got accustom to the routine. Some 2-car families avoided car pooling all together and just left one of their cars on the work-side of the river until the repairs were completed. The state made sure the parking areas on either side of the bridge were patrolled by security personal.

This same concept could also incorporate bus service to and from each side of the bridge if needed for those people who could not form car pools or where such a pool would not be practical since they only wanted to visit a doctor, relative, or store on the other side of the river for a short period of time.(Some enterprising locals on the work-side of the bridge even offered taxi service to make a few bucks)

Had the bridge repair been so complex that it was impossible to use a moveable temporary pedestrian bridge section to allow people to walk across the bridge, the plan was to allow people to drive to the bridge, park their car, take a ferry to the other side and then either take the special buses that the state had provided to get to town or get into the cars that they had permanently parked on the other side of the river to get to town. (Of course you could just have your car ferried across the river each day but that would be much more expensive and every day you would have to wait in line until they had room for your car on the next ferry).

All in all it was a big pain in the butt for all concerned, but we ultimately did get to work or to the other places they needed to get to in town. It just took a little planning and patience which I suspect would be no problem for smart, independent Vermonters like you folks are.
-- Posted by Just Me on Thu, Oct 22, 2009, 12:52 pm EST

report this comment



We need a bridge NOW! It's not the ferries that will cause trouble it's the differently spelled but simular sounding represenentatives adrift in New York and Vermont government.
-- Posted by Richard Merrill on Thu, Oct 22, 2009, 9:10 am EST

report this comment



Peter Shumlin dropped the ball on this one??what a laugh. He as leader of the senate never faced the revenue and tax problems last session but spent the session dealing with the marriage issue.Now he offers an apology?.. The people of Vermont better wake up and replace him before he forgets who he is being paid bye. It is time for a big change in the leadership in the house and senate ..He definately is not what Vermont needs as governor.
-- Posted by bruce meyer on Thu, Oct 22, 2009, 3:37 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout