RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

City, RRA contract up in air



Toolbox

By STEPHANIE M. PETERS STAFF WRITER - Published: November 5, 2009

It's been more than a decade since the city has had a formal contract with Rutland Redevelopment Authority for community development services.

In that time, however, the city's funding for the organization — allotted under the "professional services" line in the community development piece of the general fund budget — has remained steady at $55,000.

With the budget proposal released this week that stands to change.

Gone is the $55,000 for professional services, replaced instead by a $60,000 line item for "subcontractors."

Together, the reclassification and small bump in funding are meant to send a message, according to Mayor Christopher Louras. Once again, the city's community development work will be awarded under the terms of a contract that will include a means for performance-based assessment — but it shouldn't be taken as a foregone conclusion that subcontractor will be the RRA, he said.

Louras and Mark Foley Jr., chairman of the RRA's Board of Commissioners, are working on a new, short-term contract that would carry the organization through the end of this fiscal year. Then, Louras said he will pursue a longer-term contract, but that "doesn't necessarily anticipate that it's the RRA."

"I'm going to start negotiations with them first," he said. "Hopefully we can reach an agreement … but we have to review the relationship and determine whether the city's been getting its money's worth."

Both Foley and RRA Executive Director Tom Macaulay see this as positive for the organization.

"Quite honestly, we've just been operating under the terms of the old agreement … on a handshake," Macaulay said.

The RRA was first awarded the city's community development contract in 1995, about the same time that Tom Donahue left his post in City Hall as the community development director and the position was effectively eliminated. For those first two years there was a contract, but neither Louras nor Macaulay said they knew why, after the last one expired on June 30, 1997, it was allowed to lapse for so long.

That contract lists as the services the RRA will provide: Administering the city's community development grants, acting as the city's representative on issues of transportation and housing betterment and functioning as the city planner under the direction of and in conjunction with the aldermen's Community Development Committee. The agreement also calls for the authority to make monthly progress reports to the aldermanic committee and assign to it a liaison from its Board of Commissioners.

Asked if this shakeup comes because he doesn't feel the RRA has met the city's expectations, Louras said "it depends on how it's measured."

"I think in order to raise $55,000 (in revenue for the city) there would have to be an increase to the grand list of $2 million," he said. "I don't think we've seen the grand list grow by $2 million through any action of the RRA."

However, Louras said he also believes there are nonquantifiable benefits to the RRA provided for in the structure outlined in the charter.

Foley said he's also hoping that a contract will help solidify accountability and expectations for the organization.

"We think it's important and of value and we want to make sure we're providing a value," he said.

Should the RRA not receive the city's community development contract, however, Macaulay said the decision would not affect the organization's operation. It would continue to function as provided for in the charter, he said.

stephanie.peters@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


"Clark Kent", I agree with the conflict there, but maybe when he takes over there will be a change in attitude. As far as the rent being to high, I agree with that a little and here's why.

I just opened a business within Rutland City, and tried very hard to find a building suitable for my needs in the downtown area. Our business would have complimented many others businesses in the downtown area, so it was a good fit. Many of the building I looked at were owned by the Monopoly, Pistol & Roses (Mark Foley Sr.).

When it came to drafting a lease agreement, he would not make any simple requests to our offer, graduated rent pricing was not offered (as it is with any other landlord) and water was the main issue. Now the buildings we were looking at had been and are still vacant for years, why would someone not want to eagerly rent this prime street level properties? My thoughts are they don't need the money and they like the write off.

Black Mold growing within all of the buildings were a definite "NO" to rent these buildings. This issue has also been the reason for other businesses moving out of the downtown area.
-- Posted by Shawn Pemrick on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 9:39 am EST

report this comment



It's time to rid Rutland City of the RRA and the Downtown Partnership, both funded by the downtown tax. Both are useless. And why is the son of the major owner of downtown properties now the chairman of the board for the RRA? Seems like a conflict to me. His father is one of the reasons that downtown cannot flourish as he charges such high rents. Guess it is a nice tax write-off. This city is really screwed up!
-- Posted by clark kent on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 7:47 pm EST

report this comment



Is this the same group that continues to advacate for more sidewalk work downtown when you can`t walk there from the surroundind neighborhoods on city sidewalks without twisting an ankle or brakeing your leg? Look to our neighbors in WestRutland. How were they able to get the grants to repair ther sidewalks? Why was Rutland city not applying for those same typs of grants? I should think that we are no better than the peoples of New Jersey. Look at the corruption they put up with!
-- Posted by Frank Westcott on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 1:56 pm EST

report this comment



I work for a local factory and it currently has about 970 employees. The talk in this factory is about the Mayor how he has no clue on what hes doing. They are so upset with him he will be loosing many votes next year. We hope Shawn Pemrick runs for Mayor, he has a vision already for the City and people are talking saying he would do a great job.
Keep up the good work shawn
-- Posted by Rich C on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 9:38 am EST

report this comment



It's always seemed to me that the very existence of the RRA falls into the "Well, We Gotta Have Something Like This Around Here" category of mostly-useless alphabet business and development organizations.

Having said that, the idea of Chris Louras judging anyone or anything else on the basis of ROI or quantifiable results is completely laughable.
-- Posted by That Guy on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 8:56 am EST

report this comment



"However, Louras said he also believes there are nonquantifiable benefits to the RRA provided for in the structure outlined in the charter".

Which is? Where are those monthly updates to the BOA also?

The RRA has done nothing to redevelope Rutland, I stand corrected if someone can list something here. Appears each project has either failed or has not come to completion.
-- Posted by Shawn Pemrick on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 8:35 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout