RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Housing group unveils new units



Elisabeth Kulas, executive director of the Housing Trust of Rutland County, unveils the organization's new name and logo during a tour of one of its new buildings on Cottage Street (exterior below) on Thursday.

VYTO STARINSKAS / RUTLAND HERALD

Toolbox

By STEPHANIE M. PETERS STAFF WRITER - Published: November 6, 2009

A steady stream of people milled through newly constructed and freshly renovated apartments at 25 Cottage St. and 42 and 44-46 Pine St., on Thursday, admiring natural wood floors, handicapped-accessible features in some units and energy-efficiency measures in others.

The open house was the Rutland County Community Land Trust's official unveiling of its newest housing stock, which, coupled with minor renovations at two long-held properties, 221 Dorr Drive and 76 Williams St., marks the completion of another scattered site project for the organization.

The 16 new units on Cottage and Pine streets boost the organization's total stock to 197 apartments, 32 mobile homes and 28 homeownership opportunities throughout the county — all before the organization reaches its 20th anniversary.

That's not all that was revealed, however. Rutland County Community Land Trust has officially changed its name to Housing Trust of Rutland County.

The name Rutland County Community Land Trust "leaves a lot to be desired in terms of telling you what we do," said Executive Director Elisabeth Kulas during a reception at the open house. "We wanted a new name as we enter our 20th year that describes what we do … we anticipate being known as a housing trust."

Kulas said the organization will focus on rolling out its new name, including a new Web site, housingrutland.org, more in the coming weeks and months. Thursday was more about the project.

According to Kulas, the organization had held an interest in the crumbling red brick house at 25 Cottage St. long before it was finally able to purchase the property. By the time it did acquire the house, they found that structurally, it would have to be torn down. However, in keeping with the old house's features, it was painted a brick red hue, positioned at the same distance from the street and given a similar front porch.

"This building complements the rest of the street," Kulas said.

Behind it, another segment of the building is painted a golden color. In total, 25 Cottage St. contains six units.

On Pine Street, there are seven units of new construction in the building at 44-46 Pine St., while 42 is a house the land trust acquired and decided to renovate rather than demolish.

All five buildings were outfitted with solar hot water, and the Cottage Street building is also being used as a test site for evacuated tube solar collectors – a type of solar panel that has yet to be used elsewhere in Vermont. The Cottage and Pine Street buildings have also achieved Energy Star designation through Efficiency Vermont, Kulas said. The buildings also contain a total of four handicapped-accessible units.

In total, $4.9 million was budgeted for the five-building project, $375,000 of which came from U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's HOME Program and $420,000 of which came from the Vermont Housing Conservation Board, a regular partner for the organization.

"What an achievement," said Kathleen Konz of the VHCB. "The work they do … they really have a huge impact on this community in terms of community development."

stephanie.peters@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


pills much? Q: whats the hardest thing about being an angry poster? A: telling your friends you're gay...the worst thing about public rantings are the inability to kick the chair out from under them
-- Posted by Kram yeltnuh on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 10:33 am EST

report this comment



Well they do say low pants and low lifes are one in the same maybe Krammer you should not wear that shirt that says I'm with STUPID with the arrow pointing up
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Nov 7, 2009, 5:10 pm EST

report this comment



i like low pants people
-- Posted by Kram yeltnuh on Sat, Nov 7, 2009, 9:20 am EST

report this comment



Carole that would be really be nice if you gave them poeple jobs and they kept them but it has all been tried before these dregs of society do not want to work they want to do drugs and breed and the working class pay for there unwanted welfare babies. It would be even nicer if all the bleeding hearts take them in and pay more in taxes and the ones that want to spend there money on there own family instead of these junkies can, just for the record Carole there is no such thing as santa claus the easter bunny or a working junkie
-- Posted by Billy Garrow on Sat, Nov 7, 2009, 6:55 am EST

report this comment



There is always the pro's and con's to anything. I think
instead of housing the ''low life, hippy, druggy, low pants
people'' why not use the money to rehabilitate the ''low
lives'' who once belonged to a family, mom /dad, back to the point before they were on the streets, get them jobs, any job, to contribute to the housing, and what ever else
you are going to do for them. there is a lot of community
service that could take up their time also, just to keep them off the streets, and doing something constructive.
I am a special needs planner, i believe you have to help the people before anything else.
-- Posted by carole shackleford on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 9:10 pm EST

report this comment



People need to do some math. $4.9 million invested at 5% generates $245,000 in annual income. That would provide 50 familites with a $400 rent subsidy in the private sector. Instead 16 lucky ducks are getting homes that cost more than $300,000 each.
-- Posted by dragonslayer None on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 6:48 pm EST

report this comment



By the way the ones that get into these apartments will be the welfare breed or the element you see wondering the streets with their baggy pants , so we the working class will have to pay for the apartments, the welfare,food stamps, medicaid ,college ( they often take the college route so they do not have to work ) drug rehab, the police calls, boy what a deal for the working man.Will anyone help us???????????
-- Posted by Billy Garrow on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 5:53 pm EST

report this comment



We the tax payer always get ripped off and there is nothing we can do about it but *****, they steal our money everyday, maybe if we all said this is enough and joined the tea party movement? That might work seeing everyone says Vermont is such a liberal State and if we change.... after all was that what we all were promised, What a load of crap!
-- Posted by Billy Garrow on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 5:46 pm EST

report this comment



These numbers just don't add up. (Well, duh.) $4.9 million for a 16-unit project? Really? After HUD and VHCB, who (already) paid for the other $4.1 million?

Honestly, is this yet another RH typo? If not... where, specifically, did the money come from?
-- Posted by That Guy on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 3:14 pm EST

report this comment



$306,250 per apartment equals $2035.00 per month mortgage, plus property taxes and utilities, so these apartments should rent for $2500.00 -$3000.00 per month. How people out there can afford that? I know I can't.
-- Posted by Shawn Pemrick on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 2:10 pm EST

report this comment



What an impact this has on our community, your right it has an impact. So this "affordable housing", paid with our tax dollars, is soooo affordable.

Let's do some math - 4.9 million dollar project, divided by 16 apartments = $306,250.00 per apartment. Does this sound afforable to anyone? The only reason why this is affordable is because we, the taxpayers, foot the bill for it. Last time I looked, yesterday, the average household value in this area is $163,000.00. Tell me how the so-called "affordable housing", is priced almost double per single family home in this area?

So let's talk about how much property tax these "affordable housing" projects contibute to our community. "The work they do...they really have a huge impact on this community in terms of community developement". Your right, they do have a huge impact, requiring more city services and not paying their fair share of the burden.

I want to thank the Housing Land Trust of Rutland County, (or the taxpayers), for making them energy efficient though. This will mean I will have to pay less tax dollars in supporting the fuel and energy to maintain these homes I paid for.
-- Posted by Shawn Pemrick on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 2:01 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout