RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Not in anyone's back yard



Toolbox

Published: November 7, 2009

There was a very interesting forum held at the West Rutland town hall on Oct. 22. Three speakers presented information that should cause anyone to think very hard about whether an industrial wind "farm" in their community is a good thing. Or whether it's even useful to meet Vermont's renewable energy goals.

Most people realize that the 40 proposed towers (taller than the Bennington battle monument) and turbines (big as a bus) will radically impact the view of the highest peaks of western Rutland County. Day and night.

What they may not know is that there can be health problems. Insomnia. Heart irregularities. Stress-induced disease. In the Netherlands, it's called the new Dutch disease; in Japan it's called wind turbine disease. At some wind projects, they've been severe enough to make developers "buy out" nearby families who cannot stay in their homes. To get the payment, they have to sign a "gag" agreement so they can't talk about their stories.

There is evidence that low-frequency noise, the kind that shakes your house, and your body, without you hearing it, is increased when the things are placed on mountaintops and ridgelines with valleys below.

There is anecdotal evidence that when a wind "farm" moves in, the hunt-able wildlife moves out.

This should be a wake-up call to everyone in Ira, Clarendon, Middletown, West Rutland, Poultney, indeed, all of the county. This project is targeted at our community because one large out-of-state landowner happens to own 4,000 acres of mountaintop and wants to generate revenue. It's backed by a huge Italian conglomerate. They will reap the benefits. Not Rutland County, despite the meager payments to host towns, which will not compensate for the loss of value to real property, nor the harm to those directly in the path of the blades.

It isn't a case of NIMBY. It's NIABY (not in anyone's backyard). These machines should be sited where people aren't, if at all. In fact, there's good evidence they won't even contribute to the solution of carbon dioxide because they only produce at a small fraction of rated capacity, and least of all when it's needed most.

Get the facts at www.stopillwind.org or www.vce.org.

GREG ULLSTROM

Clarendon








READER COMMENTS


Just me, it makes more sense doesn't it? But I'll tell you, wind turbines affect ocean creatures too. If I remember right, particularly the ones who "echo locate".
I can't send you to the document I read but I do believe it's true. Didn't save it because it didn't support the solid "case" needed to protect my backyard. (Shame on me.)

Mark?! Hypocrisy?! Geeze. You know, Vermont is already the lowest GHG producer in the nation per capta in energy production, and "among" (not my word) the lowest for GHG produced per individual. The whole concept of industrial wind, from the type of power produced, to the the slippery people ramming it down my throat, STINKS!
-- Posted by Local Yokel on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 11:07 pm EST

report this comment



How about using the high and low tides to run turbines and tell the windmills to downsize to an individual user level?
-- Posted by Shy Wreath on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 10:25 am EST

report this comment



Obviously, Vermonters are generally opposed to renewable energy. That's fair; we aren't out of oil yet and we have the military might to preserve our access to middle-eastern oil.

But I wish we could nix the hypocrisy; please don't advocate "green" this or that when really you don't have any interest in it.
..
-- Posted by mark on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 9:40 am EST

report this comment



How about placing wind turbines offshore, where they cannot be seen from land (and where there happens to be more wind)?
-- Posted by Just Me on Sat, Nov 7, 2009, 6:43 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout