RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Killington pass holders continue to battle



Toolbox

By Bruce Edwards STAFF WRITER - Published: November 8, 2009

A two-year-old lawsuit that claims Killington Resort wrongfully cancelled lifetime season passes continues to wind its way slowly through U.S. District Court in Burlington.

The lawsuit filed by several pass holders was certified earlier this year as a class action by Judge William Sessions.

Since then lawyers for the plaintiffs and former and current owners of the ski resort have filed a series of motions, the latest being one filed by the ski resort defendants for summary judgment. At the same time, the defendants also asked the court to seal the motion for summary judgment – shielding it from public view.

In seeking to seal their motions for summary judgment, lawyers for the current and former owners – Killington/Pico Ski Resort Partners, SP Land Co., SP II Resort, Killington Ltd,, S-K-I Ltd., and American Skiing Co. – cited a previous court order that kept certain documents and deposition testimony of both sides confidential. The defendants' lawyers argued the same information already subject to the court's protective order is also contained in the motion for summary judgment.

Lawyers for the pass holders objected to keeping the summary judgment motion under seal. While both sides have previously agreed that nearly all discovery material should be deemed confidential, "the wholesale sealing of summary judgment filings" is no longer appropriate given the passage of time, Mitchell Pearl wrote in his objecting motion on behalf of the pass holders.

The ski resort defendants also filed a motion to separate the liability and damages phases of the trial. They argued that the "evidence concerning liability and damages is significantly different" and that splitting the phases "will prevent juror confusion and substantial prejudice to defendants." The also argued that its would speed up the trial process and could hasten resolution of the case.

Again, the plaintiffs objected saying splitting the liability and damage award phases of the trial would be inappropriate given the type of case.

Following the purchase of Killington Resort in May 2007, owners SP Land Company and Powdr Corp. cancelled what it considered investor season passes. The companies operate the resort under Killington/Pico Ski Resort Partners. (Powdr Corp. is not named in the lawsuit).

The passes were issued during the early years of Killington as an inducement to invest in the fledgling ski area. The new owners cancelled the passes explaining that they purchased the assets of the ski resort and not the company, which ceased to exist following the May 2007 purchase. Therefore, the owners said the investor passes were no longer valid and would expire following the 2009 ski season.

That action prompted pass holders Martin Post, Jill Post, Judith Dark and William Langlais to sue the former and current owners of Killington Resort.

According to court documents, the class action includes 1,243 investor pass holders, which were issued between 1958 and 1965. Over the years, some passes have been sold and then resold.

The plaintiffs are represented by the Middlebury law firm of Langrock Sperry & Wool.

The defendants are represented by Loewinsohn Flegle Deary, Dallas; Gravel & Shea, Burlington; Primmer Piper Eggleston & Crammer, Burlington; Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew, Burlington.

bruce.edwards@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


Michael they didn't buy the company, the bought the assets only, the company was defunct as of the sale. None None, you seem to think that "Killington" is the same entity no matter what company owns it. Get a clue. Why would this stock gamble be any different than any other stock? All bets are off when that company ceases to exist, which it did at the sale.
-- Posted by Concerned Citizen on Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 11:00 am EST

report this comment



Lifetime means lifetime. Killington has so much money what difference does letting a few old geezers ski for free matter?
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 5:37 pm EST

report this comment



What is not mentioned in the article is that the new owners did continue lifetime passes on a select group of people and hid it under a restrictive covenant. They decided to take care of a few and ignore the rest.
-- Posted by richard howe on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 3:01 pm EST

report this comment



I agree with SP Land on this one, these passes are 40 years old, and have been sold and resold by the passholders numerous times, in some cases, attached to sales and rentals of condos on Killington. The original investors got their money back and then some. At a price of $1,249 per ski pass, 1,243 passes equals over $1.5M per year in passes SP Land would essentially be giving away to investors of a ski company that is now dissolved. I'm sure most of the owners of these passes are not the original investors.
It seems one of the first things SP Land did when they acquired Killington was to get rid of all the old blood; many employees that had been there the longest got a severance check and were sent packing, which is not an uncommon practice. Anybody with any perception of having seniority due to being a "lifer" for the old company was replaced, as Killington was rife with privileged employees. I'm sure they viewed the lifetime passholders in the same way.
If a Dunkin Donuts moved into the location of a former coffee shop, would the former customers still get to use their coupons? Highly doubtful.
-- Posted by concerned citizen on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 12:28 pm EST

report this comment



When one company buys another company, they not only buy their assets, they also buy their liabilities. That is the argument for the pass holders in this case.
-- Posted by Michael in Vermont on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 9:51 am EST

report this comment



Most of these passes were transferable. How bout all the people who in good faith bought one of these passes for thousands of dollars and just a few years out of it. Besides why does a big company who purchased Killington fight such a small battle. Hardly seems worth it.
-- Posted by Debora Doyle on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 9:39 am EST

report this comment



They did not get the pass for free. They bought them in the very beginning when Pres was trying to find startup money for the resort. The fund raising worked and the pass holders recieved what they were propmised. A pass for as long at Killington as long as Sherburne Corp operated lifts on the mountain. Sherburne, SKI, and ASC are gone they do not operate lifts a Killington so the offer is over.
-- Posted by northstar62 on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 6:41 am EST

report this comment



Imagine getting a pass for free as many of these selfish people did, using it for at least 45 years and now bitching because they are losing them. An unlimited pass today costs $1,249. If you averaged out at value of $500 a year many of these people have received over $22,000 of benefit and now they want more. Greedy, greedy, greedy.
-- Posted by Top of Rutland on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 8:29 pm EST

report this comment



These pass holders should have unrestricted use of all lifts that are being operated by Killlington Ltd, SKI or American Ski Company on Killington mountain. Oh those entities don't exist anymore? I guess that means it's a dead issue. If the company is gone the offer is gone as well. Just because the mountain exists and someone else is running lifts doesn't mean a thing.

Maybe they should sure Les Otten?
-- Posted by northstar62 on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 6:13 pm EST

report this comment



I just looked up "sucker" in the dictionary and it says " someone that believes in forever". The company that promised this doesn't exist anymore. They are laughing all the way to the bank. They milked that cow for all it's worth.
-- Posted by Concerned Citizen on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 4:47 pm EST

report this comment



I just looked up the word "lifetime" in the dictionary. There was no reference to "40 years" in the definition.
-- Posted by Michael in Vermont on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 1:29 pm EST

report this comment



they got 40 years off those ski passes...Greedy ass rich ******.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 7:54 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout