RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Halfway house faces opposition



Turning Point house is under construction in Springfield on Tuesday.

Cassandra Hotaling / Rutland Herald

Toolbox

By Susan Smallheer STAFF WRITER - Published: November 14, 2009

SPRINGFIELD – A plan by the Turning Point Center to build a halfway house for men and women recovering from addictions, including former inmates, has run into local opposition.

But the complaints have come too late, as the project won all its permits in the summer, said Springfield Zoning Administrator William Kearns, and the period for appeals has also expired.

The Turning Point Center, which is located on Morgan Street, was given a prefabricated house, and Ed Battles, executive director of the Springfield center, said this week the house will be placed on a full, poured concrete foundation. He said he expected the first residents to move in in a couple of months.

The center has been open in Springfield for four years; there are nine such recovery centers in the state, ranging from Burlington to Brattleboro and Bennington. Each center is independent, but part of the Vermont Recovery Network, a nonprofit group.

Each provides a drop-in center for people recovering from addictions such as alcoholism or drug use, said Battles.

Battles said that there is no tolerance for people who come to the center and either want to drink alcohol or use drugs. He said he had personally reported people to the police for coming to the center to try and sell drugs.

"We've been here four years and nobody's noticed it," said Battles, who said that the new house, which would include seven rooms for recovering addicts, was an expansion of its Springfield effort. The house will also include a suite for a live-in supervisor.

Kearns said the town's 1999 agreement with the Department of Corrections on hosting the new state prison stipulated that only Springfield inmates would be discharged from the prison into the Springfield community.

Battles said he was perplexed by the opposition voiced by Kim Rhodes, a local taxi driver who lives on Pearl Street, which adjoins Morgan Street, where the Center is located. Battles said that Rhodes routinely drops off and picks up people at the center with his taxi.

Rhodes, along with about seven residents of Pearl Street, said that he was concerned that the center was too close to Park Street School, the Springfield Shopping Plaza, and Riverside Middle School. Kids walk along Pearl Street via the plaza footbridge to the two schools all the time.

Rhodes said he was in particular worried about sex offenders getting out of prison and moving into the house, because there are many children in the neighborhood, and the kids walking to school.

Rhodes and other Pearl Street residents questioned why there hadn't been public notification of the project, and they said they had been kept in the dark about the project.

Kearns said that public notification had been given in the spring, and that Springfield zoning regulations call for a public advertisement, along with individual notification to abutters.

There were only three abutters to Turning Point, he said.

He noted that the facility was located in the central business zoning district and was an approved use. He said the Springfield Development Review Board had approved the project, calling it an "accessory use" to the existing drop-in center.

Battles said the residents of the halfway house would pay rent, and were expected to get jobs and start their way back into society.

"We don't mess around," said Battles. "The house will have more rules and regulations than many homes."

Turning Point plans on taking in both men and women addicts, but Battles admitted that there were problems having a mixed population and the center may ultimately change its plan.

There are more men in recovery programs than women, Battles said, although drug and alcohol abuse is increasing in the female population.

"This is not permanent housing," he said, noting residents will stay for anywhere to three months to two years.

"They are expected to get a job and get back on their feet," he said.

Mark Ames, network coordinator for the Vermont Recovery Network, who co-founded the network, said that the first center started as an Alcoholics Anonymous Club in White River Junction 15 years ago.

"It's something this community needs," Ames said, noting that national statistics put the number of Americans with addiction problems at 10 percent of the population. "Lots of people in jail have addiction problems," said Ames.

Ames said each Recovery Center sets up its own policies, which would determine whether sex offenders getting out of prison would be accepted.

"I can't imagine they would," Ames said.

He said that 85 percent of all inmates have some kind of substance abuse problem, and that most criminal offenses in Vermont are committed while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

"They range from doctors and lawyers to construction workers and first ladies," he said, a reference to former first lady Betty Ford. "It's an equal opportunity problem."








READER COMMENTS


None, None,

If you are speaking from real life experience as a person in recovery from an addictive disorder, then good for you. How long have you been clean and sober?

Because if you are in recovery, then you should know how hard it is to stay clean, it takes a lot of work, very hard work. And I do realize that there are some that don't make it. But don't assume that just because they have a history of drug use that they will always be using. Some achieve sobriety and are doing very well, like me for instance.

I do not know how compliance will be monitored in this place but there are measures that work very well indeed. They will probably be tested on a regular basis, i am not sure. But I still feel that people need a chance.
-- Posted by mary fitzgerald on Tue, Nov 17, 2009, 6:44 pm EST

report this comment



Well Mary ---- It just might be I know from real life experience what I am talking about. I am familiar with half-way houses. Some are better than others. Have them move in with you if you think they are OK.

What systems are in place to ensure that everyone living there stays clean and sober?

Who will monitor compliance? If someone uses are they thrown out or given more chances?

What is their success rate so far? How do they measure it? How many junkies return to using drugs?

None of these questions are answered. The fact that they have flown below the radar so far doesn't mean there hasn't been problems. It just means they have stayed out of the press.
-- Posted by None None on Tue, Nov 17, 2009, 2:21 pm EST

report this comment



I'm sorry Mary I don't mean to sound flippant or demeaning of your remarks, I'm sure there are a lot of good people involved who are trying to help people. What I meant is that for the past thirty years the town and school officials have been selling the story that Springfield needed to continue to spend huge amounts of money to maintain infrastucture and the "wonderful school system" in order to attract new business. The only new business they attract are prisons and social service agencies, Springfield has more than their share now. This is what high taxes bring, not new industry.
-- Posted by ex-vermonter None on Tue, Nov 17, 2009, 10:39 am EST

report this comment



Seriously, though, those who are concerned about living next to a halfway house I think don't need to be. If you live in Springfield, you are already in the midst of a sort of grand half-way house... The town is one big half-way house.

What you folks really ought to be concerned about is the corrosive effects of Vermont politics on Springfield. I have joked for years that the best thing for Springfield would be to secede and join New Hampshire. Most Springfielders are part-time Granite Staters anyway, out of necessity.

Folks, you're zooming in on a single flame in the midst of a blazing inferno. The emergency needs to be resolved in Montpelier for there to be any lasting impact. Otherwise, these half-way houses will truly be bridges to nowhere, as the needy find a daily solution, but no hope for a better life.
..
-- Posted by mark on Tue, Nov 17, 2009, 10:28 am EST

report this comment



Someone is going to make a fresh start in Springfield? That in itself is a laugh, what are they going to start doing?

For one thing, they will be making a fresh start by living in a drug free, safe atmosphere until they are ready to make an attempt to go back to their own communities if that is what they choose to do. I did not say that they would be The people that will be living in this facility are not neccesarily Springfield residents.

That is what I meant by that statement
-- Posted by mary fitzgerald on Tue, Nov 17, 2009, 10:25 am EST

report this comment



Bwahaha-- ex-Vermonter makes the best comment I've heard in a while!

Though I disagree: I've seen lots of people make fresh starts in Springfield, Vermont. It usually involves a U-Haul...

..
-- Posted by mark on Tue, Nov 17, 2009, 10:24 am EST

report this comment



Someone is going to make a fresh start in Springfield? That in itself is a laugh, what are they going to start doing?
-- Posted by ex-vermonter None on Tue, Nov 17, 2009, 9:02 am EST

report this comment



Anyone that thinks a house full of drug addicts is no big deal doesn't know much about addiction. Many junkies relapse and relapse often. Some are on methadone but use other drugs while on methadone. Crime is common when addicted. Robbery, theft and home invasion are all very popular crimes to support a habit.


What type of person would make a comment such as that one?

Only a person that doesn't know squat about "RECOVERY" from addiction. Did you see that scenario on television?

Your statement makes sense if you are speaking about the people that you call addicts and/or junkies. But the people that this half way house is hoping to serve are people that are in recovery from their previous addictions, and trying to make a fresh start for themselves while trying to integrate back into the communities that they left behind.

So when making the formentioned statement, that person must not no much about addiction. People that will be utilizing this facility will be monitored, very closely. Most likely as a condition of their release. If there is any drug use of any kind, they will most likely be going back to jail. That is enough incentive to stay clean. This place will be a good thing, it will help the select few who are accepted, to remain clean. We should give them the chance, they may deserve it. you don't know them.

And where did the everyone get the notion that recovering drug addicts are going to prey on the neighborhood children? Not everyone getting out of jail is a pedophile you know.

And what was said about this facility lowering peoples property values? I think that the old abandoned eyesore of a wherehouse, that is right around the corner from the turning point, is doing a fine job of that on its own.
-- Posted by mary fitzgerald on Mon, Nov 16, 2009, 10:16 pm EST

report this comment



Anyone that thinks a house full of drug addicts is no big deal doesn't know much about addiction. Many junkies relapse and relapse often. Some are on methadone but use other drugs while on methadone. Crime is common when addicted. Robbery, theft and home invasion are all very popular crimes to support a habit.


I realize there are all these good intentions out there but reality is very different from what we wish it could be. I don't blame people for being upset. Rutland already has enough social programs, criminals and drug dregs.
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Nov 16, 2009, 5:19 pm EST

report this comment



"Battles said he was perplexed by the opposition voiced by Kim Rhodes, a local taxi driver who lives on Pearl Street, which adjoins Morgan Street, where the Center is located. Battles said that Rhodes routinely drops off and picks up people at the center with his taxi."

Perplexed, Mr. Battles? Give me a break. It's fairly obvious that through his own interaction with your clientele (most of whom I'll just bet aren't of the "doctors, lawyers, pilots, or first ladies" variety that you members of the rehab industry so glibly use to put a more benign face on your primary user population), Mr. Rhodes has decided that they don't belong in a residential neighborhood, which, in this case, also happens to be Mr. Rhodes' neighborhood. I'll take Mr. Rhodes first hand assessment and condemnation of this project over the glittering generalties extolling its virtues that continue to be posted here. Furthermore, the neighborhoods concern for its children and those who attend the nearby schools is also valid.

This is a major failure of Springfield's government to have allowed the establishment of this facility adjacent to a residential neighborhood, much less its expansion.

My guess is that none of the advocates and supporters of this project have to contend with it 24/7/365 next door to their personal residences or in their neighborhood. Nor do they have to deal with its impact on their property values or the future marketabiilty of their homes. Which is the point...facilities like this don't belong in or adjacent to residential neighborhoods and its clientele don't need to be anywhere near such neighborhoods until they have successfully demonstrated that they are fully rehabilitated (if that's even truly possible) and not in transition to a fully rehabilitated state.

The final irony here is that The Turning Point is classified as "a US tax exempt organization...which receives a substantial part of its support from a government unit or the general public." Isn't is a fitting injustice that those who lead responsible lives, own their own homes, raise their children and strive to keep them safe, abide by the laws of the land, and see over 50% of what they earn consumed in an endless array of local, state, and federal taxes are the very same folks who are rewarded for their social responsibility with an albatross like Turning Point in their neighborhood?

Springfield's residents have enough challenges in this day and age without its government continuing to betray them with unwise decisions like this.
-
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Mon, Nov 16, 2009, 4:13 pm EST

report this comment



Major taxpayer you are majorly ignorant. There are folks who have been through these programs across the country, far more intelligent and affluent than you and I. Be careful before you start preaching to those who have a whole lot more knowledge and experience with this than you do. These are not all unemployed felons. These are your neighbors my neighbors our childrens friends, their former teachers, nurses, machine tool workers, pilots, lawyers and doctors in communities exactly like Springfield all across the country. In some instances people who you have done business with in the past. Many of them have worked in childrens oncology wards, and donated to them.
-- Posted by Ben Dover on Mon, Nov 16, 2009, 2:14 pm EST

report this comment



This was certainly in the papers way back when.

Pearl Street has not seen any ill effects in the last four years of hosting Turning Point, and there is no reason to assume there will be any in the future.

These are our neighbors we're talking about.
Everyone needs a helping hand at some point in their lives.

Too little, too late, people.
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Nov 16, 2009, 1:14 pm EST

report this comment



As an educated, employed, hardworking woman, I never thought I would need the services of a mental health facility. But, I have. And, it's clear to me that those of you who are opposed to this facility have NO IDEA of the kinds of people who end up needing these services. God forbid any one of your family members ever develops a drinking or drug problem. And "Major Taxpayer," rarely have a heard such vehement judgment against others. Hope you don't live in a glass house.
-- Posted by Sandy D on Mon, Nov 16, 2009, 12:27 pm EST

report this comment



Exactly, Mark. Well stated.
-
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Mon, Nov 16, 2009, 11:19 am EST

report this comment



ex-vermonter below succinctly describes the economics of VT. Is Springfield really a "trash town"? There's little question.

But I believe the issue isn't whether we have halfway houses or where we put them, it's the overarching health of the community they are in. If halfway houses and government agencies are the defining "industries" of your community, then you're losing your town.

The win-win is to help needy people live in healthy communities. It is NOT to dump them into clusters where they will only sink further. That means a deeper effort to reduce taxes, minimize the size of state government, and work hard to lure real industry to your community. Then, the halfway houses will exist in balance with successful businesses, and we can all benefit -- especially the recovering addicts and ex-inmates.

Look at it this way: what could be better for a recovering man who is trying to get back on his feet, than a job? For a job, he needs a business to hire him.
..
-- Posted by mark on Sun, Nov 15, 2009, 9:28 pm EST

report this comment



Do you realize where this is being built??
I do, I drive by it every day.
It is only 100 yards from the
Springfield palza. 50 yards from the
foot bridge that all the kids and others
use to get there.
THERE IS A BIG COVER UP GOING ON HERE.

Maybe it would be good to have main street go one
way...just keep going around the loop and get the
hell out of town.
-- Posted by My Comment on Sun, Nov 15, 2009, 7:48 pm EST

report this comment



RH staff writer, Susan Smallheer are you looking for a REAL story? Speaking or corruption, drive by the new foundation tomorrow morning and see who's equipment is doing the site work. Maybe one of the members of the planning board.
-- Posted by Major Taxpayer on Sun, Nov 15, 2009, 6:03 pm EST

report this comment



Well I am finally building my garage. Started the process last May.
It is 50 feet from my pond...had to get state approval because it is
considered wetland....so I had to let 12 abuters know (as far as 1.5
miles away.) (Since the wetland is that big) Then of course had to
let the Real abuters know (by letter) PLUS had to have the local
newspaper run a artical for so many weeks telling of my project.
IT MAKES ME SICK SEE that a project like that on PEARL
street can get away so easy as far as getting a zoning premit
and not letting the public know in THE PAPER (at least I never
saw it)...ALSO is that piece on land not in a wetland ???
PLUS I never say the PINK ZONING PERMIT required to be put
in PLAIN VIEW....
CORRUPTION at it's finest.
-- Posted by My Comment on Sun, Nov 15, 2009, 3:00 pm EST

report this comment



I would guess that this is a clear violation,as an accessory dwelling is generally used, when speaking of a single family dwelling.It would appear a variance would needed to have been provided. I would guess that this board didnot follow the rules.It would be interesting to read the decision of this board.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Nov 15, 2009, 10:16 am EST

report this comment



If you did not receive notifaction of the hearing you clearly have recourse. Also, I would question calling this an
accessory use. The picture makes it appear to be similar in size to the existing building. I would be curious to the defintion of accessory dwelling in the zoning regulations.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Nov 15, 2009, 7:57 am EST

report this comment



I respect Springfield for being cautious of its neighborhoods and its children. These people live in our communities anyway and the true way to begin to lower the amount of drug tafficking and use is through rehabilitation. In my community released prisoners were placed in homes without our knowledge in neighborhoods throughout the Village with no thought to placement. This was unacceptable and thoughtless. We too have a medical rehabilitation facility that is a major strength in our community and respected state wide. Try to be more positive... it's the road to lowering drug and alcohol abuse, and to helping our children. True pedophiles, however have a very low recitivism rate and should be forever placed away from children and forever watched. Good job Springfield.
-- Posted by C Smith on Sun, Nov 15, 2009, 6:23 am EST

report this comment



Battles said that there is no tolerance for people who come to the center and either want to drink alcohol or use drugs. He said he had personally reported people to the police for coming to the center to try and sell drugs.

Did anyone even read the article that they are commenting on? It clearly states that there is no drug or alcohol use tolerated on the premises, and people have been turned in for the attempt. I know that people have concerns about place, but it has already been in the community for more than 4 years, and nobody says anything. What they are doing with this expansion is a good thing. Being in the recovery community myself I know how hard it is to rid yourself of addictive behaviors, it is very hard. Having a support system such as the Turning Point Centers around the state of Vermont is very important to these people. It gives us a safe place to go to be able to meet with friends, join support groups, or just go and have some coffee without the fear of being judged for what we had done in the past. I am very proud to know Ed Battles and the people that are associated with the Turning Point Centers. People should lighten up.
-- Posted by mary fitzgerald on Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 10:51 pm EST

report this comment



In Vermont there are Montpelier, Burlington and the gold tourist towns, then there are the trash towns like Springfield, Rutland and Windsor where the previously mentioned towns dump the drug atticts, criminals and mental problems. And just think Springfield is one of the highest taxed towns in one of the highest taxed states in the nation, we should expect more...let me rephrase, we deserve more, we expect what we get. Springfield is now like a bee hive where all the bees work for the benefit of the queen, in this case the queen is the town government and school system.
-- Posted by ex-vermonter None on Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 8:33 pm EST

report this comment



MAJOR I am already involved as a volunteer @ three different organizations. Again tho, I still would feel honored to assist in this newest venture. Thanks for your encouragement.
-- Posted by Johanna Jensen on Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 6:08 pm EST

report this comment



Johanna, give the insincere, holier then thou crap a rest. There are a myriad of organizations for children, veterans, elderly, hospice, and the infirmed all of whom could use your support vs. your hollow offer. And Johanna here's the huge difference, addicts and felons have left a trail of victims in their path and deserve no one's pity. Go visit a children's oncology ward and get back to me.
-- Posted by Major Taxpayer on Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 5:23 pm EST

report this comment



I would be most happy and proud to someday offer my services to an organization of this kind. If ever in need of a volunteer I would be more than open to assist. People reaching out to People...its what makes this world go round.
-- Posted by Johanna Jensen on Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 4:22 pm EST

report this comment



How many more indicators like this do we need to finally be convinced that Springfield's town government has failed its citizens? Year after year of tax increases coupled with absolutely inept governing decisions have put Springfield in a socio-economic ditch so deep that it will take a miracle to extricate it.

We've gone from machine tools to mental health...From the Precision Valley to a prison venue...From tree lined streets of proud, well maintained homes to ratty roads of Section 8 and apartment dwellings...From hope and promise to hovels and poverty...And Springfield's pathetic town government is responsible for much of this decline...

Our illustrious town bureaucrats ought to view the following video clip and then do a little soul searching to determine just how a vibrant town lost its way under their leadership.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYh8jkB6KN8

After you watch that clip, just think of what a similar video made today would look like featuring a halfway house for addicts and felons instead of a modern factory for honest, hardworking, industrious, law abiding men and women.

Springfield's government is responsible for the decades of decline we've experienced. It's long past time to sweep out the municipal building and install some real leadership there that will address the chronic systemic and structural issues that have led Springfield into the economic abyss...
-
-- Posted by Bill O. Rights on Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 10:20 am EST

report this comment



This facility is unsuited for Morgan/Pearl Street or any other family neighborhood. These unemployed, homeless, felons, drug addicts, and sex offenders represent the worst element of humanity. Such will be allowed to idlely loiter for two years with a proven likelihood of being repeat offenders. By Battles own admission, drug trade exists on site even before these former inmates arrive.

Make no mistake, neighborhood and abutting property residents received no notice of this soon to be flop house. A lazy, inept, planning board just figured this to be OK. Perhaps Kearns would think differently if this facility was proposed next to his home.

Dozens of young children both play and pass by on their way to school less then a quarter mile away. The potential for adverse interaction is far too great to ignore. Absolutely no written provision for 24 hour supervision or curfew exists. And even if it did, how or who would enforce it?

It doesn't take much imagination to envision how these unemployed felons will be funding their addictions. Just hope Kearns is prepared for a barrage calls at home. Each reminding him how much we enjoy having our cars and homes ransacked. Thanks a lot William for making Springfield the blight it is!
-- Posted by Major Taxpayer on Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 8:20 am EST

report this comment



NIMBA!!!!! NIMBA!!!!!!
-- Posted by Steve Graves on Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 8:01 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout