RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

Study outlines health bill effect Discrepancies between state, federal numbers



Toolbox

By DANIEL BARLOW Vermont Press Bureau - Published: November 25, 2009

MONTPELIER – Tens of thousands of Vermonters will have access to health insurance under the health care reform plans being debated in Washington, D.C., according to a state-by-state study released by the federal government Tuesday.

The "Case for Change" report details the number of more Americans who would get health insurance coverage under President Barack Obama's plans, along with other proposed changes of coverage for senior citizens and small businesses.

Nearly all of Vermont's uninsured residents – along with about 25,000 who are underinsured – would have access to affordable plans as part of the health insurance exchange, the report states.

Additionally, more than 100,000 Vermont seniors would receive free preventative care and more than 18,000 would see their prescription drug costs through the federal Medicare Part D program halved when they hit the notorious "doughnut hole" – the point when the government stops funding drug purchases.

"Much of the debate over health care reform has centered on a few proposals, but mostly ignored the other 2,000 pages of the bill," said Rep. Steve Maier, a Middlebury Democrat and chairman of the House Health Care Committee. "What this summary does well is explain the ways that health care reform will affect Vermont."

Under the plans – which could change between now and whenever the U.S. Congress finally votes – an estimated 58,000 people will qualify for tax credits to purchase insurance, according to the report.

"They're talking about shrinking the doughnut hole, allowing for insurance portability so that your coverage is not tied to your employment, and cost reduction," Maier said. "These are all issues that we've been talking about in Vermont."

More than 11,000 Vermont small businesses would also qualify for tax credits to help pay for employee premiums. Those who receive coverage under Medicare – about 104,000 people in Vermont – would also get free preventative health services.

"Thirty percent of Vermont residents have not had a colorectal cancer screening, and 18 percent of women over 50 have not had a mammogram in the past two years," the report states. "Health insurance reform will ensure that people can access preventive services for free through their health plans. It will also invest in a prevention and public health fund to encourage prevention and wellness programs."

But health care advocates and lawmakers in Vermont – including many who are generally supportive of Obama's plans – said Tuesday that the federal report contains incorrect information, including drastically overstating the number of uninsured residents.

According to the federal Agency of Health and Human Services, there are 74,000 Vermonters without health insurance.

But state numbers – via a year-old survey by the Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration – show there are actually just over 47,000 residents without insurance, a number that slowly declined between 2005 and 2008.

Another error is noting that, under the health care reform plan, people with a history of health problems will have an easier time finding insurance options through the establishment of a "high-risk" pool.

Vermont already has a law that is known as guaranteed issue – a regulation that ensures that an insurance company cannot reject an applicant because of their medical history.

Nick Pappas, a spokesperson for Health and Human Services, said the report's statistics were taken from a recent study by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Urban Institute. He said the plan debated in Washington would save Vermont millions of dollars a year, including allowing Catamount Health recipients to move to other insurance options as part of the exchange.

"Vermont has done impressive work to help insure its residents and improve the quality of care," Pappas said. "Health insurance reform will further improve care for Vermonters and all Americans."

Susan Besio, director of Health Care Reform, a state agency that monitors health care programs and services, could not be reached for comment about the report Tuesday.

But Gov. James Douglas, in his weekly press conference Tuesday, worried that Vermont could be penalized for being ahead of the rest of the country in reforms. The version in the U.S. Senate would penalize two states – Vermont and Massachusetts – by not giving the states matching federal funds for Medicaid expansion.

U.S. Sens. Patrick Leahy and Bernard Sanders are aware of the issue and have been working to address it, according to their offices.

"I think it is important that Vermont get its fair share," Douglas said.

Despite some of the errors in the report, it does provide a first glimpse at how the multibillion-dollar plans under debate in Washington could affect the more than 600,000 people living in Vermont.

Still, the information didn't impress Peter Sterling, executive director of the Vermont Campaign for Health Care Security, an organization that promotes expanding health care coverage to all residents.

Sterling said he was hoping for more information on how national health care reforms would affect Vermont programs such as the Vermont Health Access Plan or Catamount Health, two programs that offer insurance to residents who don't qualify for other plans.

"There was no 'wow' moment when I read this," Sterling said.

daniel.barlow@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


TG Look at the article again. Now read my post again. The federal folks and state folks can't agree on the number of uninsured in Vermont. Either way Catamount is a failure that is costing us more then they budgetted and is not bringing in the numbers they thought. You are making my point for me. If people can't afford it then its another plan the Government started that just is not working. It is not doing what they intended it to do. So we will increase fees and taxes and rates to continue to carry this failed program. Thank you for the assistance That guy and have a very Happy Thanksgiving.
-- Posted by Jim Eckhardt on Wed, Nov 25, 2009, 6:46 pm EST

report this comment



Take a deep breath, Jim. We all know where you stand on Catamount, but this post is circling the Moon, even for you.

"This article basically says, Catamount is a huge failure."

No, Jim, the article "says" nothing of the kind. YOU think Catamount is a "huge failure" because you've been complaining about it from the start. It ain't the same thing.

"74,000 without insurance in Vermont."

Did you even bother reading the whole article before firing off your angry missive? The actual number's no more than 47,000, according to year-old BISHCA numbers.

"They projected that 25,000 would be on Catamount by the end of 2010. At the end of 2008 only 7052 were enrolled."

Yup. And now they're at over 9,600. And we're in the middle of an enormous recession, unforeseen in 2007, that's stunting people's ability to pay for any insurance. And -- wait, let me check my calendar -- it isn't quite the end of 2010 yet, is it?

Inquiries are up, enrollment isn't. That means that people are having a hard time affording even Catamount's cheap rates.

Congratulations, Jim. You just made a great argument for a comprehensive single-payer federal health care plan!
-- Posted by Son Of That Guy on Wed, Nov 25, 2009, 4:50 pm EST

report this comment



Wow, This article basically says, Catamount is a huge failure. Catamount was suppose to drastically reduce the number of uninsured in Vermont. It does not appear to have worked and is in huge debt, so lets do it on a national level. Good grief. The federal people and state people can't even agree on the number of uninsured in Vermont. 74,000 without insurance in Vermont. They projected that 25,000 would be on Catamount by the end of 2010. At the end of 2008 only 7052 were enrolled. So they aren't getting the participation they thought they would get and they are deeply in debt. Yea this is working good, full steam ahead. Oh, and Maines plan worked equally as well until the people of Maine were allowed to vote on it and it got scaled way back.
-- Posted by Jim Eckhardt on Wed, Nov 25, 2009, 2:01 pm EST

report this comment



Please note this article does not tell the the truth. "you lie!" is a better way to put it. This plan will raise taxes on the middle class and small business. It will force people to buy insurance. It will not be cheap or free for anyone, nor should it be. It will cut Medicare for the elderly and the best part is it will not be put in place until 2014!!! Don't believe for a minute the Government is here to help you. They are picking your pockets and driving out businesses. They only want to control your freedom, your property, your life and, yes, your death.
-- Posted by Jack Bauer on Wed, Nov 25, 2009, 12:44 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout