RutlandHerald.com - We Are Vermont

DOC official faces charges



Toolbox

By Brent Curtis STAFF WRITER - Published: December 4, 2009

A Department of Corrections administrator in charge of training prison staff is facing multiple charges, including a felony, and has been placed on administrative leave while an internal review of the case takes place, according to Corrections Commissioner Andrew Pallito.

Barry Mulcahy, director of the Vermont Corrections Academy and an administrator involved in every aspect of Corrections Department Training, pleaded innocent recently in Rutland District Court to a felony charge of impeding a public officer and misdemeanor charges of drunken driving and disorderly conduct.

Mulcahy, who lives in Leicester, was cited to appear in court last month after he was arrested in Brandon by police who said they needed to use a Taser to subdue him.

Brandon Sgt. Charles Whitehead said Mulcahy was weaving over the yellow line when police stopped his GMC truck on Route 7 on the night of Nov. 11. Mulcahy's wife told police that she followed Mulcahy in her car because she was concerned about her husband, who had spent most of the day drinking, Whitehead said.

For his part, Mulcahy told police he drank about a 12-pack of beer — and he had an open 12-ounce Corona in his truck when he was stopped, police said. But after failing a field sobriety test, Mulcahy refused a breath test, Whitehead said.

The sergeant said Mulcahy also became aggressive during processing at the Brandon Police Department, threatening the three officers in the room. When Mulcahy allegedly advanced aggressively toward one of the officers, Whitehead said he used his Taser to subdue the 48-year-old man.

Mulcahy was jailed after police booked him but was released and cited into court. After his arraignment, he was freed on conditions of release.

Pallito said the incident prompted Corrections officials to place Mulcahy on administrative leave while an internal investigation takes place.

"We need to give him a chance to respond," Pallito said of the 24-year Corrections veteran. "But these are serious charges and (the Agency of Human Services) investigation unit is reviewing the case."

The results of that investigation could lead to disciplinary action and dismissal, Pallito said.

The charges against Mulcahy came as a surprise to the commissioner who described Mulcahy's performance over the years as "stellar."

"Barry oversees the academy where the core values include integrity and truthfulness," Pallito said. "I don't know what happened or why."

brent.curtis@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


Ms. Burnett, WPTZ reports this man's wife did call 911 while following him in the car.

Assuming that's true (and I believe it is), the story is really "Wife Saves Husband's Life."
-- Posted by Kristin None on Mon, Dec 7, 2009, 8:37 pm EST

report this comment



Setting a good example so far... paid administrative leave... for how long? Hope they don't restrict his travel; since he's got nothing to do with his time, and plenty of dough it'd be nice if he could winter in a warmer clime.
-- Posted by FDR None on Sun, Dec 6, 2009, 11:59 am EST

report this comment



Barry is not a correctional officer. He runs the DOC training center in Waterbury.

To those of you who want him to get treated the same as everyone else: he will be. The court and the prosecutor will go out of their way to see that if convicted, his punishment will be equal to or greater than, what everyone else gets. He will NOT get a "freebe" (freebie) as one moron suggests he might.

The state of Vermont, his employer, will likely be extremely hard on him as well. They will very likely want to make an example out of him so they might step on him as hard as they can. So to you lowbrow: rest easy, knowing the state of Vermont will try to crush this guy both in court and on the job.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Dec 5, 2009, 1:32 pm EST

report this comment



The way the law reads...Refusing a breathalizer is an Automatic 6 month loss of driving priviledge, Now throw in scrapin"with police... Everyone makes mistakes... Lets see if everyone is treated the same.
-- Posted by Northern Rebel on Sat, Dec 5, 2009, 12:54 pm EST

report this comment



Mr. Mulcahy is a state corrections officer, and should be responsable for his actions. He admitted to drinking about 12 beers,failed the field sobriety tests,and refused the breath test. As to the other charges Felony Impeding ,do they charge everybody that gets aggressive with them, I thought the charge of Disordely Conduct would be sufficient. His wife should have driven him home or called 911 if he would not let her drive. He should lose his licence for the 90 days,and undergo alcohol treatment pay a fine,but not lose his job.
-- Posted by Born in Vermont on Sat, Dec 5, 2009, 9:44 am EST

report this comment



welcome to reality md the entire world is full of people like this just go down to massivetwoshits.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Dec 5, 2009, 8:55 am EST

report this comment



at 48 yrs old the idiot should know better than to drink and drive.What else to you expect another idiot JOEL DAVIDSON to say?Fn state is full of these two-faced people.
-- Posted by mitch davis on Sat, Dec 5, 2009, 8:29 am EST

report this comment



K.C. Goodie....before you ********* your mouth you should get your facts straight, while Mr. Davidson very well may have been fired If you do a little research you will find he was cleared of any wrong doing and given his job back, which means he did not lie about anything.
-- Posted by Matthew Smith on Sat, Dec 5, 2009, 6:28 am EST

report this comment



Well lets just hope the system is fair to all that have this problem. Giving him a freebe would not be fair to those that do not hold a job telling others what is right and wrong.
-- Posted by Daniel Brown on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 8:49 pm EST

report this comment



He sure forgot to use his brain when getting behind the wheel after 12 beers at least, sounds like he has some issues when your driving a lethal weapon as in his car!! Knucklehead would be putting it mildly!!
-- Posted by True Vermonter on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 5:43 pm EST

report this comment



Mr. Brown, it sounds to me like you have a personal axe to grind. I, too, know this man, very well, and he is a very solid citizen and good family man, in every aspect of the word. Michelle, good questions. Can he receive a fair trial in Rutland County? That's something his lawyer and his family will have to decide. The fact that he refused a breath test meant that the public will never know those results, but he will automatically lose his driver's license for a specific period of time. Will he, also, lose his job? That remains to be seen. Let's hope not. in my opinion he is a highly valued person for the State of Vermont and the Corrections Department.
-- Posted by Tom Boyce on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 5:30 pm EST

report this comment



I know the man personally. He did not have the ability to pass the sobriety test but he did have the ability to show his true colors while drunk. I am sure it came as a SHOCK to him that his opinion does not always matter. In my opinion what goes around comes around. If he had the perpensity to be a good person he would not have been housed in jail or tased. This is not just a blemish people need to look deeper.
-- Posted by Daniel Brown on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 4:09 pm EST

report this comment



I know the man personally. He did not have the ability to pass the sobriety test but he did have the ability to show his true colors while drunk. I am sure it came as a SHOCK to him that his opinion does not always matter. In my opinion what goes around comes around. If he had the perpensity to be a good person he would not have been housed in jail or tased. This is not just a blemish people need to look deeper.
-- Posted by Daniel Brown on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 4:08 pm EST

report this comment



This is an honorable man who had a bad day. He deserves more than nut cases making uninformed judgments about him online. To the extent corrections afficers are able to show any humanity in a very difficult job, it is due in large part to Barry Mulcahy.
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 12:28 pm EST

report this comment



wow do you even read the article or do you skim through the first few sentences and then start posting your rants?

First he is facing impeding a public officer as well as disorderly conduct on top of the dui that is no slap on the hand, second of all if you actually spent the time reading the article you'd know he refused to do the breathalyzer.
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 9:32 am EST

report this comment



Barry has almost single handedly taken the Vermont Department of Corrections into the realm of a true professional agency with the development of excellent training programs and policies that currently guide the officers and agency. His contributions to the State and community are outstanding. I hope the Human Services Agency can show some humanity and get him help in dealing with this isolated blemish on his otherwise "stellar" career. I'm sure he will handle this situation in the same professional manner that he has conducted his career.
-- Posted by Joel Davidson on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 9:31 am EST

report this comment



i forgot everyone else gets their readings on the breathalyzer put in the paper what was his, not that that makes a real difference but then no one else should be in the paper either
-- Posted by Michelle Burnett on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 6:15 am EST

report this comment



how can he be tried in Rutland wouldn't you think it would be a conflict of interest. What gets me is his wife followed him as she was concerned about him as he spent most of the day drinking. I have 2 major problems with this lady HELLO if he is driving call 911, and 2nd you should be more concerned that you drunk husband is giong to seriously injure or kill someone.
He will get a slap on the hand told not to drink and drive again. yeah right his wife needs to be the one driving.
as far as his job, if he wasn't on "company hours" then it shouldn't affect his job. many people get charged for DUI/DWI and they still are employeed by the same company.
-- Posted by Michelle Burnett on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 6:14 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout