• Wind development measure passes House
    By Kirk Carapezza
    Vermont Public Radio | April 27,2013
    • Email Article
    •  Print Article

    Wind turbines generate power at the Searsburg Wind Power Facility in Searsburg, Vt. Thursday, July 21, 2005. Two ridge lines in the southern Green Mountain National Forest soon could sprout 370-foot tall wind power generators, if the U.S. Forest Service approves what would be the first wind energy project on its lands anywhere in the country. A company called Deerfield Wind LLC has proposed up to 30 of the towers in a special-use application to the Forest Service. The review is expected to take up to 18 months. (AP Photo/Tim Roske)
    The Vermont House on Friday overwhelmingly passed a bill that was originally proposed as a moratorium on ridgeline wind development in Vermont.

    Over the past two months, though, the bill was reduced to a study of how the state approves renewable energy projects.

    The House voted 140-3 to approve the Senate bill.

    Rep. Tony Klein, D-East Montpelier, chairman of the House Natural Resources and Energy Committee, has emerged as a lightning rod for opponents hoping to strike down wind projects. On Friday he rose to passionately acknowledge that the beleaguered bill has taken a circuitous route to the House floor.

    A product of the 1960s, he quoted the Grateful Dead.

    “What a long, strange trip this has been,” said Klein, whose committee found that the kind of research called for in the Senate bill would be nearly impossible — and too expensive — to conduct.

    “Some of the tasks that were sent to us in the Senate bill was on research that, quite frankly, hasn’t been done anywhere yet,” Klein told his colleagues, pointing to real estate values that may or may not be affected by energy-generation plants as one example.

    “To really get some sort of baseline of understanding, you’ve got to go to a community where a project has been built — and remember that we’ve only had recently two projects built in the last few years — and you’ve got to wait and see what happens to the real estate values there,” Klein said.

    He emphasized that his committee learned it would take four to six years to get reliable real estate information — time, he said, lawmakers can’t afford to take in developing energy policies.

    “There is an energy problem in this country,” Klein added. “There is an energy problem in this world, and we can’t go on, business as usual and not pay attention to it.”

    Proponents in the House and Senate had hoped the bill would give greater local control to town and regional planning committees in reviewing renewable energy projects.

    Rep. Don Turner, R-Milton, the minority leader, said his constituents who live near Georgia Mountain still hope for a more cautious, balanced approach to ridgeline wind development.

    “This week the wind turbines on the mountain didn’t turn at all,” Turner reported. “We need to understand that.”

    Turner added, “Georgia Mountain, which was this pristine mountain, now has a cut right up through the middle with four big turbines sticking out of it. Some say ‘beautiful,’ some don’t.”

    Turner and other House lawmakers said they are confident that the bill recognizes some of the flaws in Vermont’s renewable energy policies.

    • Email Article
    •  Print Article
    MORE IN Vermont News
    COLCHESTER — Industrial hemp growers have harvested their second crop since the Vermont... Full Story
    MIDDLEBURY — A western Vermont woman is dead after the pickup truck she was riding in crashed... Full Story
    WASHINGTON — Vermont’s congressional delegation is divided between outright opposition and “wait... Full Story
    More Articles