The New York Times said recently:
Last year, European officials laid out an important proposal for a banking union that would resolve failed institutions; provide strong, central supervision of banks; and give depositors a solid guarantee that their money was safe. If carried out fully, the plan could help restore health to the Continentís depressed economy.
But progress toward a banking union has been delayed by internal divisions within the European Union. In particular, Germanyís stubborn insistence that a banking union must be preceded by changes in treaties threatens to put a full economic recovery off for several more years.
In weak European economies, like Spain, Italy and Greece, banks are increasingly unwilling or unable to lend to businesses and individuals. Many are sitting on piles of bad loans made during the bubble years that are unlikely to be repaid in full. These institutions should be shut down, merged or given more capital. But the governments in these countries, which themselves are struggling to meet European fiscal targets by raising taxes and cutting spending, are not in any position to rescue their banks.
Late last month, European finance ministers took a half-step toward a banking union by agreeing that shareholders and some creditors must accept losses before taxpayer funds could be used to prop up troubled banks. But the agreement, which still has to be approved by the European Parliament and will not go into effect until 2018, would not establish a central European authority to deal with failed institutions. Each national government would be responsible for dealing with its own troubled banks even though many nations do not have the ability or political will to address the problem. It would be far better if policymakers gave that authority to a Pan-European agency, which would be independent of political interference.
The European Central Bank has bought some time by aggressively buying assets from banks, but its intervention is unlikely to turn the economic tide. Unemployment in many European countries is tragically high. And it is difficult to imagine how these economies will ever create jobs without properly functioning financial systems.MORE IN Election Letters
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: Dutch father of microbiology Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovers the existence of one-celled organisms; in 1967, The Doors are booked to play the Ed Sullivan show; in 1858, freedom fighter Dred Scott dies on this day in St. Louis.
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: No money this year for western rail project, Lola Aiken memorialized in Montpelier, Supreme Court Castleton murder suspect will remain in jail, Shaftbury man fires shots from his AK-47 into neighbor's home.
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: On this day in 1959, Soviet Premier Nikita S. Khrushchev arrives in U.S. for historic 13-day visit; in 1987, Secretary of State George Shultz and Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze sign nuclear reduction agreement.
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: City celebrates completion of its newest mural, on West Street opposite the post office, more than $2 million in federal grants will bolster Vermont's health centers, Patrick McArdle reports on pending sale of Vermont papers.
- RICHARD'S POOR ALMANACK: Henry Hudson sails up the Hudson River as far as present-day Albany, Leo Szilard has epiphany waiting for the light to change, 3 kids report a West Virginia close encounter in 1952.
- TOMORROW'S HEADLINES TODAY: Who will run for mayor in Rutland next year? Has Bennington overcome its fear of twerking? Documentary 'Hungry Heart' packs the Paramount, and the city's Creek Path scores another million-plus dollars.