• Confronting risk of re-offense
    July 30,2013
    • Email Article
    •  
    •  Print Article
     
    The issues surrounding the final release of Timothy Szad raise some very complex and troubling questions. (Setting aside the sentencing practices and good time statutes in place at the time of his conviction.) I hardly think California will thank us for sending him to them, and it is quite likely that they will return the favor at some date. I fully understand the reaction of the citizens of Springfield to the idea of his living in that town. It would frighten anyone. At the same time, often the best protection against predators or criminals of all types following release is to have them living in communities that know them, recognize them and will keep a watchful eye on their whereabouts and behaviors. Absent that scrutiny, the risk of re-offense increases even more, and that is now the situation whatever community in California he is going to will face. It is also the situation some community in Vermont will (and probably unknowingly already does) face.

    ANITA CARBONELL

    Rutland
    • Email Article
    •  
    •  Print Article
    2 Comments
    MORE IN Letters
    I read with utter disbelief the letter by Adam Berg (Herald, Aug. Full Story
    I was raised in rural upstate New York and saw some of the problems that come with fracking. Full Story
    In wake of The Herald’s recent reporting on an ongoing lawsuit involving the Rutland City Police... Full Story
    More Articles