• Confronting risk of re-offense
    July 30,2013
    • Email Article
    •  
    •  Print Article
     
    The issues surrounding the final release of Timothy Szad raise some very complex and troubling questions. (Setting aside the sentencing practices and good time statutes in place at the time of his conviction.) I hardly think California will thank us for sending him to them, and it is quite likely that they will return the favor at some date. I fully understand the reaction of the citizens of Springfield to the idea of his living in that town. It would frighten anyone. At the same time, often the best protection against predators or criminals of all types following release is to have them living in communities that know them, recognize them and will keep a watchful eye on their whereabouts and behaviors. Absent that scrutiny, the risk of re-offense increases even more, and that is now the situation whatever community in California he is going to will face. It is also the situation some community in Vermont will (and probably unknowingly already does) face.

    ANITA CARBONELL

    Rutland
    • Email Article
    •  
    •  Print Article
    2 Comments
    MORE IN Letters
    I do not care in the least if the decision was/was not politically correct, nor, if in the... Full Story
    Reading the opinion pieces on the settlement of 100 Syrian refugees in Rutland provides me with... Full Story
    When I moved from my hometown of Rutland to Portland, Maine, last summer, one of my first... Full Story
    More Articles