• Voters chose sensible solution
    March 19,2014
    • Email Article
    •  Print Article
    Voters chose sensible solution

    A March 14 letter to the Herald said those who voted for the proposal for a new Middlebury town office building and gym had betrayed their town. That proposal, including an exchange of downtown parcels with Middlebury College and $5.5 million of college financial support, passed by 53 percent to 47 percent. It will raise the town tax rate by about 2 cents; the least costly alternative, renovation of existing decrepit and, in the case of the office building, ill-suited structures, would have raised rates by at least 6.5 cents.

    So who took actions perhaps not in Middlebury’s best interest? I won’t use the unfortunate word “betray.” Well, opponents made many reality-challenged claims; I will address only those mentioned in the letter.

    n The existing gym is “noble” and “renovation-worthy.” It is a run-down energy hog that would take $2.7 million to bring fully up to code.

    n The new gym will be “a gift” to our high school sports teams. High school officials have repeatedly stated teams will only use attached and separately funded locker rooms.

    n “Middlebury College will devour irreplaceable town land.” It will become a park.

    n Backers of the project “falsely accused” opponents of personal attacks on a Select Board member. Well, he was unfairly alleged to have a conflict of interest on this project as a former Middlebury College professor. But he had that same relationship to the college when the town and college agreed that the town would accept financial backing for an in-town bridge. Curiously, project foes said nothing then.

    There were other misleading statements that muddied the waters before the vote; perhaps that was one reason it was as close as 117 tallies, rather than passing only because of some imaginary “lock-step assault on the democratic process.”

    What really happened on March 4 in Middlebury was simple: a majority of voters decided a good, cost-effective solution was found after 20 years of study.


    • Email Article
    •  Print Article
    MORE IN Letters
    I couldn’t agree with Cristine Smith’s letter of Nov. 25 more sincerely. Full Story
    Ms. Smith, I’m confused. You started your recent screed with praise for the Greatest Generation. Full Story
    The Rutland Herald’s decision not to publish a paper on Sunday or Monday has had a disastrous... Full Story
    More Articles