• Single payer is key campaign issue
    August 24,2014
    • Email Article
    •  
    •  Print Article
     
    ďSingle payerĒ is the buzzword of Vermontís 2014 election. A candidateís pledge to support single payer is the litmus test for some. Big money ó mostly from out-of-state unions ó is flowing into Vermont to support candidates who pass the single-payer test.

    So whatís the big deal? If the state delivers on its promise ó the same or better health care at a lower cost ó weíre all going to support single payer. This is really a non-issue.

    But perhaps Vermonters are starting to have doubts. The single-payer political action committee Vermont Leads has found only 10 candidates out of the 34 contestants to endorse in the 2014 legislative primary races. (Full disclosure: If I were running for re-election, I assume I would have passed the test and gotten an endorsement, too, because I voted for Act 48.)

    Voters now have seen how poorly the state has performed in its first attempt at health care reform, and they are rightfully more cautious about supporting something that has yet to be described. Blind support of a program that has no clear definition is like agreeing to buy a new car before you know how many miles it gets to the gallon, what it costs, or what the monthly payments will be.

    The design and implementation of Vermontís health care exchange has been a disaster, and no one disputes that. As a legislator who voted for the bills that created our exchange, I am culpable on some level for this failure, because the Legislature didnít insist on more safeguards and checkpoints on the rollout. Single-payer legislation must be much more carefully crafted and robust, and no one should agree to buy this thing until they know what it is. We know we want a new car, but we need to see the sticker.

    The question for voters should be: Do we want candidates who will insist on what was promised, or should they act like lemmings marching to the sea? What if the single-payer system does not provide universal access to health care? What if it rations the quality or quantity of health care? What if it is more expensive than our current cost?

    Do we want candidates to vote for single payer regardless of access, quality or cost? This seems to be the real issue.

    Unfortunately, we wonít know the answers to these questions by the primary on Aug. 26. We likely wonít know by the November election either. So whatís a voter to do? Sometimes, the past is the best predictor of the future. We need to elect legislators who will pursue the promise of single payer but not allow another health care debacle to occur in Vermont. Thatís what I intend to do.



    Paul Ralston of Middlebury is a Democratic member of the Vermont House and co-founder of Vision to Action Vermont.
    • Email Article
    •  
    •  Print Article
    2 Comments
    MORE IN Perspective
    By the time this goes to press, we will have numbly stumbled through almost two weeks since the... Full Story
    Lean into love, labor for change
    Now that we as a nation have had some time to think about the Orlando tragedy, perhaps it might... Full Story
    0626_RH_Lowe Down

    Photo by Linda Treash

    BarnArts Center for the Arts is... Full Story
    The Lowe Down: Is any town too small for the arts?
    More Articles