In Wednesday’s article regarding the request for $30,000 for bump-outs, Mayor Allaire was quoted: “It’s hard to put a price tag on people’s safety.”

I agree with the mayor on this. But if we’re looking for ways to improve pedestrian safety, I would suggest putting that $30,000 into sidewalk repairs in and around downtown so that people aren’t always walking in the streets.

For example, what happened to the Strongs Avenue sidewalk? That recent project was supposed to connect the Howe Center to downtown for pedestrians. Instead, the sidewalk on the west side just ends and people walk across the grass and parking spots. That seems to be a bigger safety issue and an unfinished project.

This grant was sought after to deal with one important issue raised by the Downtown Rutland Partnership — walkability in downtown, specifically, the danger pedestrians face crossing West Street in front of the Transit Center. I supported the project originally for that reason because encouraging pedestrian traffic is a proven economic driver and demonstrates a vitality in a downtown.

The second bump-out didn’t sway me one way or the other, as it was too far from downtown to be relevant, and city money wasn’t needed. The Partnership, the Rutland Redevelopment Authority and Rutland Blooms were contributing enough to make it a successful project. But once the cost exceeded projections, my argument was not to throw more city money at it but rather to cut expenses.

Reducing the scope of work to include just construction of the primary bump-out would potentially reduce the need for additional contributions. The RRA, through its executive director, said this may be an option but didn’t want to pursue it for a variety of reasons. I’m disappointed in the unwillingness to problem-solve this in a collaborative manner and instead, turn only to the city for more money as if that was the only solution.

The city is not a piggy bank. Hopefully, my perspective will gain some traction.

Christopher Ettori is a Rutland City alderman.

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

(1) comment

David Searles

The lack of a designated pedestrian crossing on Main at or near Strongs is criminal. The closest one to the north is way up the hill at Christ the King. The closest to the south is between the state fair grounds and McDonnalds. Add to that, there is no walk signal to safely cross Strongs at Main. A person standing on the north the north corner has no idea what the condition of the turn arrow is for northbound cars coming off of Main onto Strongs. A person standing at the south corner can't see any light at all. It's all guess work and luck. Does anyone actually think that a child or a person in a wheel chair could cross there safely. Of course, it only takes a few dollars to change the speed limit signs to slow things down to give pedestrians a fighting chance - but Rutland apparently doesn't really care about the ones who would be walking there anyway. If one or two get bumped off, no great loss, right?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.