As to your article on Page 1 of Jan. 15, citing pending legislation in the House proposed by Representative McCullough, I feel a response is required.

In reference to funding of the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department, this proposal is way off base. While the majority of funding is provided by people hunting and fishing, as well as a federal tax on the equipment they use, there is no provision to tax other casual users of our wildlife.

I propose that if you drive in to a state fishing access (funded by fishing license revenue), you will be charged a fee if you do not possess a valid license. If you use hiking trails to view wildlife and do not possess a valid license, pay a fee. If you own a second home here to come enjoy our wildlife, pay up through higher taxes.

Thousands of Vermont residents (including me) continue to buy licenses to support our Fish & Wildlife and the department's mission, while never again picking up a weapon or fish pole due to physical restraints. We, as do 90% of other license holders, do not harvest game in anywhere near the quantity in comparison to our expenditure.

Representative McCullough, if you are so worried about Fish & Wildlife revenue, tax those who use but as yet do not pay.

Norman J. Coote

North Clarendon

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
0
0
0
0
0

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.