John McClaughry had a point in his recent op-ed (“Can’t be done,” Nov. 30-Dec. 2). It will, indeed, be exceedingly difficult, perhaps even impossible, for the world to reduce carbon emissions to net zero anytime soon — even by 2050.

Of course, it would have been something of a challenge to essentially eliminate net carbon emissions in time to preserve a stable climate even if we had begun a serious effort on the first Earth Day in 1970. But it would have been eminently doable.

Why didn’t we, you may ask? Largely because McClaughry, and others like him, have been sarcastically dismissing the threat of global climate disruption in the intervening decades, creating enough confusion to prevent action. Now responsible and competent scientists agree we have a crisis.

To adapt the sage advice of the late Sen. George D. Aiken during the Vietnam War, it is time for McClaughry to declare victory and go home. After all, as he so clearly explained in his op-ed, he and his allies have almost certainly won.

Richard Andrews

Springfield

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
0
0
0
0
0

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.